Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Sushi: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
*'''Delete''', regretfully. Although it's an attractive portal and the category does have a moderate amount of content to draw from, spot checks suggest that a high proportion of the articles are stubs, short starts or orange-level tagged. [[User:Espresso Addict|Espresso Addict]] <small>([[User talk:Espresso Addict|talk]])</small> 11:03, 2 April 2019 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''', regretfully. Although it's an attractive portal and the category does have a moderate amount of content to draw from, spot checks suggest that a high proportion of the articles are stubs, short starts or orange-level tagged. [[User:Espresso Addict|Espresso Addict]] <small>([[User talk:Espresso Addict|talk]])</small> 11:03, 2 April 2019 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' - 18 pages is sufficient scope for a portal in my opinion, with potential for future additions. The fact that many of those need further expansion is not a reason for removing the portal that links to them; if anything, drawing attention to them in a portal might attract editors to expand them further. [[User:Waggers|<b style="color:#98F">W</b><b style="color:#97E">a</b><b style="color:#86D">g</b><b style="color:#75C">ge</b><b style="color:#83C">r</b><b style="color:#728">s</b>]][[User talk:Waggers|<small style="color:#080">''TALK''</small>]] 12:56, 2 April 2019 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' - 18 pages is sufficient scope for a portal in my opinion, with potential for future additions. The fact that many of those need further expansion is not a reason for removing the portal that links to them; if anything, drawing attention to them in a portal might attract editors to expand them further. [[User:Waggers|<b style="color:#98F">W</b><b style="color:#97E">a</b><b style="color:#86D">g</b><b style="color:#75C">ge</b><b style="color:#83C">r</b><b style="color:#728">s</b>]][[User talk:Waggers|<small style="color:#080">''TALK''</small>]] 12:56, 2 April 2019 (UTC) |
||
::Please read the nom statement carefully. I included page view stats. The portal will never modivate readere to improve the stubs around the topic. [[User:Legacypac|Legacypac]] ([[User talk:Legacypac|talk]]) 13:12, 2 April 2019 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 13:12, 2 April 2019
18 subtopics including several lists. Many of the subtopics are very short, under developed or can't be developed much beyond a stub like Seattle roll. The rest of the scope here is businesses that make or serve sushi that have articles, and those pages are only of interest to locals or visitors to their local market. Just not a topic well suited to a portal - the article does a better job. Even with very prominate linking by text and image from every food portal this is running less than 10 views a day compared to Sushi with 6,606 revisions since 2001-09-27, 3,344 editors, 432 watchers, 75,518 pageviews (30 days), Legacypac (talk) 08:31, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete, regretfully. Although it's an attractive portal and the category does have a moderate amount of content to draw from, spot checks suggest that a high proportion of the articles are stubs, short starts or orange-level tagged. Espresso Addict (talk) 11:03, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
- Keep - 18 pages is sufficient scope for a portal in my opinion, with potential for future additions. The fact that many of those need further expansion is not a reason for removing the portal that links to them; if anything, drawing attention to them in a portal might attract editors to expand them further. WaggersTALK 12:56, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
- Please read the nom statement carefully. I included page view stats. The portal will never modivate readere to improve the stubs around the topic. Legacypac (talk) 13:12, 2 April 2019 (UTC)