Jump to content

User talk:Filologo2: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Filologo2 (talk | contribs)
Filologo2 (talk | contribs)
Line 68: Line 68:
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> [[User:Girth Summit|<span style="font-family:Impact;color:#294;">Girth</span><span style="font-family:Impact;color:#42c;">Summit</span>]][[User talk:Girth Summit|<sub style="font-family:script;color:blue;"> (blether)</sub>]] 18:43, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> [[User:Girth Summit|<span style="font-family:Impact;color:#294;">Girth</span><span style="font-family:Impact;color:#42c;">Summit</span>]][[User talk:Girth Summit|<sub style="font-family:script;color:blue;"> (blether)</sub>]] 18:43, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
:Hi, I just wanted to drop you a line to add to the above, and to my comments at the [[Genocide of indigenous peoples]] talk page. I realise that you're fairly new to editing, and so you might not be aware of certain policies. There are lots mentioned in the welcome template above, but in particular it would be good if you'd be willing to read through [[V|verifiability]] and [[WP:OR|original research]]. You seem to be inserting views and interpretations into the article that aren't supported by the sources - this isn't allowed. Alternative viewpoints could be included per [[WP:WEIGHT]], but they would need [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] to support them. Given that you obviously feel strongly about this, [[WP:RGW]] is worth reading as well. Cheers [[User:Girth Summit|<span style="font-family:Impact;color:#294;">Girth</span><span style="font-family:Impact;color:#42c;">Summit</span>]][[User talk:Girth Summit|<sub style="font-family:script;color:blue;"> (blether)</sub>]] 13:14, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
:Hi, I just wanted to drop you a line to add to the above, and to my comments at the [[Genocide of indigenous peoples]] talk page. I realise that you're fairly new to editing, and so you might not be aware of certain policies. There are lots mentioned in the welcome template above, but in particular it would be good if you'd be willing to read through [[V|verifiability]] and [[WP:OR|original research]]. You seem to be inserting views and interpretations into the article that aren't supported by the sources - this isn't allowed. Alternative viewpoints could be included per [[WP:WEIGHT]], but they would need [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] to support them. Given that you obviously feel strongly about this, [[WP:RGW]] is worth reading as well. Cheers [[User:Girth Summit|<span style="font-family:Impact;color:#294;">Girth</span><span style="font-family:Impact;color:#42c;">Summit</span>]][[User talk:Girth Summit|<sub style="font-family:script;color:blue;"> (blether)</sub>]] 13:14, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

[[User:Girth Summit]] I don't deny I feel strongly about this. I'm literally outraged. I will try to proceed as asked hoping everyone here will discuss with me in good faith. [[User:Filologo2|Filologo2]] ([[User talk:Filologo2#top|talk]]) 14:36, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:37, 2 April 2019

Hello, Filologo2 and a belated welcome to Wikipedia! I see that you've already been around awhile and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help one get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions, you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are interested in learning more about contributing, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Red Director (talk) 18:34, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous


April 2019

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Genocide of indigenous peoples. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. GirthSummit (blether) 18:43, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just wanted to drop you a line to add to the above, and to my comments at the Genocide of indigenous peoples talk page. I realise that you're fairly new to editing, and so you might not be aware of certain policies. There are lots mentioned in the welcome template above, but in particular it would be good if you'd be willing to read through verifiability and original research. You seem to be inserting views and interpretations into the article that aren't supported by the sources - this isn't allowed. Alternative viewpoints could be included per WP:WEIGHT, but they would need reliable sources to support them. Given that you obviously feel strongly about this, WP:RGW is worth reading as well. Cheers GirthSummit (blether) 13:14, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Girth Summit I don't deny I feel strongly about this. I'm literally outraged. I will try to proceed as asked hoping everyone here will discuss with me in good faith. Filologo2 (talk) 14:36, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]