Talk:Critical thinking: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 01:31, 3 April 2019

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Critical thinking article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 4 months

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Psychology High‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Philosophy: Epistemology / Logic / Ethics High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Epistemology
	Logic
	Ethics

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Business High‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Education High‑importance

	Education portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Skepticism High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Alinamartell579 (article contribs).

Critical thinking in tutorials

With regards to tutorials in Oxford, Durham, Cambridge and LSE - in particular, it is likely that tutorials in Durham do not function like the author thinks they do.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.181.138.192 (talk) 12:08, 11 September 2015‎ (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't it be abduction instead of adduction

I see two places where the word "adduction" might be better changed to "abduction" unless I am missing something. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:6000:1016:82E8:DDEC:F334:AC27:B6E3 (talk) 20:20, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 {{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/Miami_Dade_College/FYE_Seminar_(Spring) | assignments = [[User:Alinamartell579|Alinamartell579]] }}
-==Waves of Critical Thinking==
-There seem to be numerous references to different "waves" of thought about critical thinking, all supported by a single reference repeated numerous times, namely ''Walters, Kerry (1994). Re-Thinking Reason''. How prevalent is this view in academia? Is the source academically accepted? [[User:GoodStuff|GoodStuff]] ([[User talk:GoodStuff|talk]]) 07:33, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
 ==Critical thinking in tutorials==
 With regards to tutorials in Oxford, Durham, Cambridge and LSE - in particular, it is likely that tutorials in Durham do not function like the author thinks they do.<!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/86.181.138.192|86.181.138.192]] ([[User talk:86.181.138.192#top|talk]]) 12:08, 11 September 2015‎ (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Xsign -->
-== Adding a relevant type of link to a word in the article. ==
-Hello
-Greeting for the day.
-AS in the article named critical thinking, I came across a word called decision making which i thought would be better, if I could link the word to one of my blog post which I have written in my blog.
-I think that through this minor linking, the article's quality would improve and also many readers would also get benefited.
-This was just a suggestion form my part. Rest lies upon the moderator(s)<!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Nidhivarma|Nidhivarma]] ([[User talk:Nidhivarma#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Nidhivarma|contribs]]) 15:15, 29 January 2018 (UTC)</small>
-:Okay, a couple of things:
-#Please read [[WP:PROMO]], which outlines our policy on promotional material. (Linking to your own blog post is a form of self-promotion.)
-#Please read [[WP:OR]] which outlines our policy on original research. (Using your own blog post to support or define claims in the article is considered original research.)
-#Please read [[WP:RS]] which outlines our policy on acceptable sources. (If you want to support or define a term from a source, this will help you identify what sources are acceptable.)
-#Please read [[WP:EL]] which outlines our policy on external links. (This includes all links to any site other than Wikipedia or one of our sister projects.)
-#Please read [[WP:SIG]] which outlines our policy on signatures (Tip: Use four tildes at the end of your post to automatically sign it. Just type <code><nowiki>~~~~</nowiki></code> after you're done writing.)
-#Please read [[WP:TPG]] which is a guideline on how to use talk pages. (For example, the extra spaces you added to your first line breaks typical formatting. I have fixed it for you.)
-#Please feel free to ask questions if you are unsure how to do something. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em;">[[User:MPants at work|<span style="color:green;">'''ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants'''</span>]] [[User_talk:MPants at work|<small>Tell me all about it.</small>]]</span> 15:25, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
 == Shouldn't it be abduction instead of adduction ==