User talk:Inspectortr: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 06:06, 10 April 2019

Warning for edit warring on Recep Tayyip Erdoğan

You have been edit warring on Recep Tayyip Erdoğan. Do not continue to do so. If you do, or make any more reversions, you may be blocked from editing without further warning. --(ʞɿɐʇ) ɐuɐʞsǝp 16:37, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I understand the situation. My intention was not try to create a crisis or something. I ceased. Inspectortr (talk) 22:02, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think you need to step away from editing that article for a bit. It's part of what you got previously blocked, and if you hadn't stopped after Deskana's warning, you would be a blocked editor right now, but since you stopped, I felt that blocking wasn't necessary. I am happy to talk out what you see wrong in the current article and how you think your revision is correct, but it appears to be a non-neutral statement, and you seem to have a heavy bias towards the subject. The source mentions use of some gases, like Tear gas, but not chemical weapons. I only briefly looked over the source, and provided, it's through a translator, but I know how to disseminate most translations usually. I am going to keep an eye on the article in the meantime. Happy editing, -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 23:25, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tear gas is a type of chemical weapon. Thanks.

By the way, it was pepper spray. --91.6.83.134 (talk) 19:24, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tear gas could be an exotic variety of fruit for all we care. Edit warring is edit warring, and it's not permitted. You have been warned about it, so you now do so at your own risk. --(ʞɿɐʇ) ɐuɐʞsǝp 14:13, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pepper spray? Biological weapon? ;-) --89.204.154.93 (talk) 02:30, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 11:39, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Early life and career of Recep Tayyip Erdoğan

Please do not make edits such as the one you made in this article[1]. The source doesn't say anything about the three groups being terrorists as far as I can tell. Bjelleklang - talk 20:56, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, your post didn't make much sense, but the source following the word 'terrorist' only described the play in a footnote, and said nothing about the three mentioned groups being terrorists. Please stop pushing POV, and discuss before making such edits. Bjelleklang - talk 22:07, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Hello, I'm Lugia2453. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Lugia2453 (talk) 21:35, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Turkey. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Rhododendrites (talk) 21:36, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Hi, because of the nature of your editing, I've blocked your account indefinitely. That doesn't mean I necessarily see you having to remain blocked indefinitely, I would welcome an explanation for your behaviour and any proposals you have that could see you being unblocked. Nick (talk) 22:28, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted someone, somebody from the world to hear my voice. Police are killing people on the streets in my country. Internet connection is sometimes cencored. It is hard to reach other parts of the world. This is not only about my account. This is about lives of the people of my country. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Inspectortr (talk • contribs) 22:11, 2 June 2013‎

Wikipedia is not a medium for promoting a point of view, no matter how firmly you are convinced that it is the "right" point of view. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:44, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 You have been edit warring on [[Recep Tayyip Erdoğan]]. Do not continue to do so. If you do, or make any more reversions, you may be blocked from editing without further warning. --[[User talk:Deskana|(ʞɿɐʇ)]] [[User:Deskana| ɐuɐʞsǝp]] 16:37, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
 : I understand the situation. My intention was not try to create a crisis or something. I ceased. [[User:Inspectortr|Inspectortr]] ([[User talk:Inspectortr#top|talk]]) 22:02, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
-::I think you need to step away from editing that article for a bit. It's part of what you got previously blocked, and if you hadn't stopped after Deskana's warning, you would be a blocked editor right now, but since you stopped, I felt that blocking wasn't necessary. I am happy to talk out what you see wrong in the current article and how you think your revision is correct, but it appears to be [[WP:NPOV|a non-neutral]] statement, and you seem to have a heavy bias towards the subject. The source mentions use of some gases, like [[Tear gas]], but not [[chemical weapons]]. I only briefly looked over the source, and provided, it's through a translator, but I know how to disseminate most translations usually. I am going to keep an eye on the article in the meantime. Happy editing, -- [[User:DeltaQuad|<font color="green">DQ]][[User_Talk:DeltaQuad|<font color="blue"> (ʞlɐʇ) ]]</font></font> 23:25, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
+::I think you need to step away from editing that article for a bit. It's part of what you got previously blocked, and if you hadn't stopped after Deskana's warning, you would be a blocked editor right now, but since you stopped, I felt that blocking wasn't necessary. I am happy to talk out what you see wrong in the current article and how you think your revision is correct, but it appears to be [[WP:NPOV|a non-neutral]] statement, and you seem to have a heavy bias towards the subject. The source mentions use of some gases, like [[Tear gas]], but not [[chemical weapons]]. I only briefly looked over the source, and provided, it's through a translator, but I know how to disseminate most translations usually. I am going to keep an eye on the article in the meantime. Happy editing, -- [[User:DeltaQuad|<font color="green">DQ</font>]][[User_Talk:DeltaQuad|<font color="blue"> (ʞlɐʇ) </font>]] 23:25, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
 ::: Tear gas is a type of chemical weapon. Thanks.
 :::: By the way, it was pepper spray. --[[Special:Contributions/91.6.83.134|91.6.83.134]] ([[User talk:91.6.83.134|talk]]) 19:24, 11 November 2012 (UTC)