Talk:Regulation of electronic cigarettes: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 13:05, 11 April 2019

Electronic cigarettes in Australia was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 25 March 2019 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Regulation of electronic cigarettes. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Text and/or other creative content from Electronic cigarette was copied or moved into Regulation of electronic cigarettes. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Text and/or other creative content from Regulation of electronic cigarettes was copied or moved into Electronic cigarette. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Regulation of electronic cigarettes article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

Archives: 1: 30 days

Template:Ecig sanctions

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Medicine List‑class Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
List	This article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Health and fitness List‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Health and fitness, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of health and physical fitness related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Health and fitnessWikipedia:WikiProject Health and fitnessTemplate:WikiProject Health and fitnessHealth and fitness articles
List	This article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Pharmacology List‑class Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
List	This article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by when more than 1 section is present.

Division into sections

This article currently has sections on a continent, a country and the rest of the world, three different types of entity (or non-entity in the last case). Wouldn't it be better to standardize the approach by having level 2 headings for continents and then level 3 headings for countries? Phil Bridger (talk) 08:55, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Be WP:BOLD and just do it. Aoziwe (talk) 13:22, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I was rather hoping that someone else might do it, but I'll try to get round to it if and when I have time. Phil Bridger (talk) 18:39, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what the difference is between a level 2 or level 3 heading is? I don't see what the issue is with the layout or how it could be improved. QuackGuru (talk) 18:48, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A level 2 heading uses "==" and a level 3 heading uses "===". Do you really not see the problem with having a continent, a country and the rest of the world as equal level headings? I thought that was was pretty obvious. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:32, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Europe

United States

Other countries

It is split like this into three main sections. It is very simple currently. I don't know what it would look like if it were changed. I don't want it to get too complex to read. QuackGuru (talk) 19:53, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I really don't know what else I can say here, but I'll try. Europe is a continent, the United States are a country, and "other countries" are an afterthought largely inhabited by people who don't really count, even though they make up the vast majority of the Earth's population. Can't you see that this is a silly way to split up the world? Phil Bridger (talk) 20:10, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I will have to see how you split it up. Each section is in alphabetical order and it is easy to find each entry. My concern is spitting it up into too many sections. QuackGuru (talk) 01:14, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Illegality of ecig advertising in the UK

The article correctly states that EU law now bans advertisng of ecigs, but the contradicts itself by stating that advertising is legal in the UK. Adverts no longer appear on TV or in the print media. It may still be legal on billboards, but that's the limit. 130.88.123.137 (talk) 13:03, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Actually the section on the United Kingdom is all over the place. Very poor and seriously misleading.

Revision as of 13:03, 11 April 2019 edit 130.88.123.137 (talk) →Illegality of ecig advertising in the UK: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 13:05, 11 April 2019 edit undo 130.88.123.137 (talk) →Illegality of ecig advertising in the UK Next edit →
Line 36:		Line 36:

	The article correctly states that EU law now bans advertisng of ecigs, but the contradicts itself by stating that advertising is legal in the UK. Adverts no longer appear on TV or in the print media. It may still be legal on billboards, but that's the limit. [[Special:Contributions/130.88.123.137\|130.88.123.137]] ([[User talk:130.88.123.137\|talk]]) 13:03, 11 April 2019 (UTC)		The article correctly states that EU law now bans advertisng of ecigs, but the contradicts itself by stating that advertising is legal in the UK. Adverts no longer appear on TV or in the print media. It may still be legal on billboards, but that's the limit. [[Special:Contributions/130.88.123.137\|130.88.123.137]] ([[User talk:130.88.123.137\|talk]]) 13:03, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

			Actually the section on the United Kingdom is all over the place. Very poor and seriously misleading.