Talk:PewDiePie

Poppy Harlow

@PolitiCalder:, regarding you adding "Poppy Harlow" to "Also known as" in the infobox. I don't think people refer to PewDiePie with the moniker "Poppy Harlow". Rather, when they are using this name, they are referring to his role. Like when people refer to "Captain Jack Sparrow" they don't refer to Johnny Depp, and we don't list "Jack Sparrow" as a pseudonym of Johnny Depp. --Distelfinck (talk)

controversy needs its own section outside of the history section

The amount of controversy surrounding this guy is enough to be its own section outside the history section. 2600:1700:7A51:10B0:A911:E2D7:9F34:F5B9 (talk) 17:58, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

Grouping information into a "Controversies" section creates a number of problems, and there's strong consensus against organizing articles in such a manner. --Ronz (talk) 18:26, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

[citation needed] 72.181.99.6 (talk) 17:35, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

Given his name's use in both the defacement of a WWII memorial and the manifesto of the perpetrators of the Christchurch mosque attack (both in early 2019), how can we appropriately mention his name and channel in relation to ultra-right-wing activism and terrorism? 174.84.112.110 (talk) 10:41, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Find independent, reliable sources that demonstrate it is clearly worth noting in an encyclopedia article about him. --Ronz (talk) 17:43, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Here's a decent one:[1]. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 19:52, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

I don't think that demonstrates any encyclopedic value, and falls into NOTNEWS. --Ronz (talk) 21:05, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Ronz, plenty of articles about living persons have controversy sections. How would this cause any issues? Please be specific. 2600:1700:7A51:10B0:558D:104B:60B6:7953 (talk) 20:00, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

That's an other stuff exists argument.

If you're not familiar with Wikipedia's content policies, it's best to avoid WP:BLP articles, where strict adherence to content policies is required. --Ronz (talk) 21:40, 19 March 2019 (UTC)

Controversy sections should be avoided if possible. If a controversy is WP:DUE, it should be in the right place in the article, per topic or chronology or whatever, but separate controversy sections tend to act as shit-magnets. More at WP:CRITS. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 08:40, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

Pewdewpie's Bitch Lasagna and Congratulations have been banned by a court in world's largest democracy for their extremely racist and derogatory content. This warrants enough info for a controversy section, in addition to above. https://www.news18.com/news/buzz/pewdiepie-asked-to-delete-t-series-diss-tracks-fans-complain-about-rule-of-law-2099327.html Anshabhi (talk) 13:45, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

Other stuff exists argument doesn't hold here at all. How reliable do you want the source to be? We have the video of shooter and the last words uttered by him apart from massive coverage by media. Anshabhi (talk) 13:48, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

To maintain WP:DUE, we should add his reaction to all of this stuff, as is done in every other personal page with a controversy section Anshabhi (talk) 13:49, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 8 April 2019

pewdiepie is back to number 1 after t-series being ahead of him for 24hours — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.30.215.242 (talk) 19:50, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 10 April 2019

The pewdiepie height is actually 182cm T-Bad Is Irrelevant (talk) 22:16, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. – Þjarkur (talk) 22:54, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Too many quotations

The article is filled with statements and comments by Kjellberg about himself and his work. Its not appropriate. What he says is trivia. Besides that we are supposed to be writing in Wikipedia voice. See WP:QUOTEFARM. - Shiftchange (talk) 21:37, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 13 April 2019

Felix Arvid Ulf Kjellberg[4] (/ˈʃɛlbɜːrɡ/ SHEL-burg;[5] Swedish: [feːlɪks arvɪd ɵlf ²ɕɛlbærj] (About this soundlisten);[c] born 24 October 1989),[7] better known online as PewDiePie (/ˈpjuːdipaɪ/ PEW-dee-py), is a Swedish YouTuber, comedian and gamer–commentator, best known for his YouTube video content, which mainly consists of comedic shows such as Meme Review, Pew News, LWIAY (Last Week I Asked You) and You laugh You lose. Arifshahid11 (talk) 15:49, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: These are listed later in the article. The lead should be kept as a short summary and not go into too much detail. Saucy^{[talk – contribs]} 19:28, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

T-series

T-series has currently got more subscribers than Pew die pie this makes me and others very annoyed. But good job to T-series you deserve it. Go team and dont forget to sub to PEWDIEPIE!!!!!!!!!!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Phoebe.eliza (talk • contribs) 03:41, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 18 April 2019

Change subscriber count to 94,408,263 as of 18/04/19 109.77.207.221 (talk) 16:28, 18 April 2019 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. RhinosF1^(chat)_{(status)(contribs)} 13:36, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 20 April 2019

You should put in information that his mortal enemy is T-Series. SharkAgar (talk) 08:43, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

 Already done. Grayfell (talk) 08:48, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

add in that he has terrible camera quality in sweden but amazing quality in japan