Wittman v. Personhuballah: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Legalskeptic (talk | contribs) removed link from lead citation per WP:SCOTUS/SG; citation tweaks |
m →top: Task 33: Remove old SCOTUS parameter |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
|Subsequent= |
|Subsequent= |
||
|Holding= |
|Holding= |
||
|SCOTUS=2016 |
|||
|Majority=Breyer |
|Majority=Breyer |
||
|JoinMajority=''unanimous'' |
|JoinMajority=''unanimous'' |
||
Revision as of 06:32, 7 May 2019
| Wittman v. Personhuballah | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Argued March 21, 2016 Decided May 23, 2016 | |
| Full case name | Robert J. Wittman, et al., Appellants v. Gloria Personhuballah, et al. |
| Docket no. | 14–1504 |
| Citations | 578 U.S. ___ (more) 136 S. Ct. 1732; 195 L. Ed. 2d 37 |
| Opinion announcement | Opinion announcement |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinion | |
| Majority | Breyer, joined by unanimous |
Wittman v. Personhuballah, 578 U.S. ___ (2016), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the appellants lacked standing under Article III of the United States Constitution to pursue their appeal.[1] The case dealt with redistricting by the Virginia Legislature of Virginia's 3rd congressional district and allegations of gerrymandering based upon race.[1] The appeal was brought by Congressmen David Brat, Randy Forbes, and Rob Wittman.[1]
References
External links
- Text of Wittman v. Personhuballah, 578 U.S. ___ (2016) is available from: Justia Oyez (oral argument audio) Supreme Court (slip opinion)
 | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |