Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 November 23: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:47, 23 November 2006

< November 22	November 24 >

November 23

Template:Infobox MelbourneSuburbTable4

Template has no transclusions and has been succeeded by {{Infobox Australian Place}}. --◄§ĉҺɑʀκs► 14:00, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Australian Local Government Area

Redundant to better template {{Infobox Australian Place}}, not linked to any articles. --Orderinchaos78 13:48, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AFL XXXX Round YY

I have no idea what this would do for an article apart from making it rather large and ugly.><RichardΩ6 12 ^UW 07:26, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy deleted by Mike Rosoft. Whisp e ring 15:42, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and rather silly template ><RichardΩ6 12 ^UW 07:22, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete Given that the name is {{Test5}} backwards, and given the contrib history of the creator, I'd guess that this is either a test page or vandalism; I'll just go tag it for speedy. --ais523 09:32, 23 November 2006 (U T C)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Template:Numismatic Galleries

Unencyclopedic. All of the galleries herein have been nominated to be transwikied to Wikimedia Commons. --SchuminWeb (Talk) 02:01, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Unencyclopedic? Wha? When all of the galleries have been transwikied, and aren't just proposed to be, you have a good argument. But a nomination doesn't mean it will happen. -Amarkov ^blah_edits 02:03, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep until... There have been AfD for these articles. See

And all the results were keep. And there has been a discussion on how to break up these galleries at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Numismatics. When the method of partition is decided, the plan will be carried out and, of course, more encyclopedia text will be added. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 02:14, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Indo-Iranian-speaking

Delete The template is very empty because "..speaking-nations" templates categorized with an offical language but this template is categorize nations where the language speak, according this template what is next? English speaking nations template with 250 countries? Zaparojdik (talk · contribs) 01:19 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Keep There are many "..speaking-nations" templates such as Template:Turkic-speaking, that you yourself created and maintain, which proves that this is a POV nomination. --ManiF 23:59, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - the scope of this template is far too broad. PS WP:AGF. Chris talk back 00:55, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, in no way supporting "This is a POV nomination". But I don't really see what the problem with the template is. -Amarkov ^blah_edits 02:01, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep WP:POINT nomination. I'm also sensing double standards considering Zaparojdik's active support for including as many entries as possible at Template:Turkic-speaking.--Euthymios 09:31, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:zh-d-xxx

These templates are similar to {{zh-cp}}, {{zh-cpw}}, {{zh-sp}}, {{zh-spw}}, {{zh-tp}}, {{zh-tpw}}, but only make Chinese text inside as links to Wiktionary as a whole. They have been created for long time but almost no one use them, and, in most cases, what we want is to link each character to Wiktionary separately, but these six templates do not help. (so no one use them) Yao Ziyuan 07:54, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why do we want to link to characters instead of words in Wiktionary? If we talk about a Chinese word, we should link to the word's entry, not the individual characters. Kusma (討論) 08:04, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Two points, (1). No one uses it at this time. (2) I mean, actually we have better method without zh-d-xxx, for example, create a new template called "zh-d" or something alike, and use {{zh-c|{{zh-d|一}}{{zh-d|二}}{{zh-d|三}}}}, this is much more flexible. —The preceding comment was added by Yao Ziyuan (talk • contribs) 08:25, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
  - Or just use [[wikt:一|]] for 一 instead of your {{zh-d}}. Delete per nom. Kusma (討論) 15:47, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 74: / Line 74: @@
 These templates are similar to {{tl|zh-cp}}, {{tl|zh-cpw}}, {{tl|zh-sp}}, {{tl|zh-spw}}, {{tl|zh-tp}}, {{tl|zh-tpw}}, but only make Chinese text inside as links to Wiktionary as a whole. They have been created for long time but almost no one use them, and, in most cases, what we want is to link each character to Wiktionary separately, but these six templates do not help. (so no one use them) [[User:Yao Ziyuan|Yao Ziyuan]] 07:54, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
 *Why do we want to link to characters instead of words in Wiktionary? If we talk about a Chinese word, we should link to the word's entry, not the individual characters. [[User:Kusma|Kusma]] [[User_talk:Kusma|(討論)]] 08:04, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
-** Two points, (1). No one uses it at this time. (2) I mean, actually we have better method without zh-d-xxx, for example, create a new template called "zh-d" or something alike, and use <nowiki>{{zh-c|{{zh-d|一}}{{zh-d|二}}{{zh-d|三}}}}</nowiki>, this is much more flexible. <small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[User:Yao Ziyuan|Yao Ziyuan]] ([[User talk:Yao Ziyuan|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Yao Ziyuan|contribs]]) 08:25, 23 November 2006  (UTC{{{3|}}})</small>
+** Two points, (1). No one uses it at this time. (2) I mean, actually we have better method without zh-d-xxx, for example, create a new template called "zh-d" or something alike, and use <nowiki>{{zh-c|{{zh-d|一}}{{zh-d|二}}{{zh-d|三}}}}</nowiki>, this is much more flexible. <small>—The preceding comment was added by [[User:Yao Ziyuan|Yao Ziyuan]] ([[User talk:Yao Ziyuan|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Yao Ziyuan|contribs]]) 08:25, 23 November 2006  (UTC{{{3|}}})</small>
 ***Or just use <nowiki>[[wikt:一|]]</nowiki> for [[wikt:一|一]] instead of your {{tl|zh-d}}. '''Delete''' per nom. [[User:Kusma|Kusma]] [[User_talk:Kusma|(討論)]] 15:47, 23 November 2006 (UTC)