User:Nick Mulgan/sandbox: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Nick Mulgan (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Nick Mulgan (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
The maxSPRT is not agreed as the most efficient extension of SPRT to composite hypotheses <ref>Sequential generalized likelihood ratio tests for vaccine safety evaluation, Shih M, Lai T, Heyse J, Chen J, Statistics in Medicine, 29, 2698--2708, 2010</ref> |
The maxSPRT is not agreed as the most efficient extension of SPRT to composite hypotheses <ref>Sequential generalized likelihood ratio tests for vaccine safety evaluation, Shih M, Lai T, Heyse J, Chen J, Statistics in Medicine, 29, 2698--2708, 2010</ref> |
||
median = <math>\begin{matrix}I_{\frac{1}{2}}^{[-1]}(\alpha,\beta)(c-a) + a |
median = <math>\begin{matrix}I_{\frac{1}{2}}^{[-1]}(\alpha,\beta)(c-a) + a |
||
\approx \frac{7 a - 6 b - c}{7 a -12 b + 5 c}\end{matrix}</math> |
\approx \frac{7 a - 6 b - c}{7 a -12 b + 5 c}\end{matrix}</math>(the [[Beta function#Incomplete beta function|regularised incomplete beta function]]) |
Revision as of 04:43, 29 May 2019
The maxSPRT is not agreed as the most efficient extension of SPRT to composite hypotheses [1] median = (the regularised incomplete beta function)
- ^ Sequential generalized likelihood ratio tests for vaccine safety evaluation, Shih M, Lai T, Heyse J, Chen J, Statistics in Medicine, 29, 2698--2708, 2010