Jump to content

Talk:Trial of Charles I: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
PBS (talk | contribs)
m PBS moved page Talk:High Court of Justice for the trial of King Charles I to Talk:High Court of Justice for the trial of Charles I over redirect: reverted move, PRECISION. Titles of kings are usually not inclded in page names eg the biography of Charly is under "Charles I of England" not "King Charles I of England."
(No difference)

Revision as of 08:17, 29 May 2019

WikiProject iconLaw C‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.


I have noticed that a number of pages about the trial of Charles I link to a page about the current High Court of Justice which has no connection with the body that tried Charles I apart from the name. I have created this page to act as a destination for these links.

Rjm at sleepers 09:44, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"House of Lords refused to pass the bill and consequently, it did not receive the Royal Assent". This should be probably say "and consequently, it was not presented for Royal Assent" or something of that kind. Surely it must be questionable whether it would have received Royal Assent even if the Lords had passed it? 86.134.10.71 (talk) 21:45, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Be bold - edit the article. Rjm at sleepers (talk) 09:08, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of High Court of Justice for the trial of Charles I's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "hrs":

  • From Charles I of England: Robertson, Crimes, 5
  • From John Cooke (prosecutor): Robertson, Geoffrey (2002). "Chapter 1, The Human Rights Story". Crimes Against Humanity: The Struggle for Global Justice (2nd ed. ed.). Penguin Books. p. 5. ISBN 978-0141010144. {{cite book}}: |edition= has extra text (help); Cite has empty unknown parameters: |origdate= and |origmonth= (help)

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 23:10, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]