Jump to content

Talk:Trade diversion: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→Merge from Trade creation: close discussion
Line 10: Line 10:


== Merge from Trade creation ==
== Merge from Trade creation ==
{{Discussion top|result=The result of this discussion was '''no consensus to merge'''. [[User:Shhhnotsoloud|Shhhnotsoloud]] ([[User talk:Shhhnotsoloud|talk]]) 17:00, 29 May 2019 (UTC)}}


[[Trade creation]] and trade diversion are (EDIT) related effects of same concept. It makes sense to use one article to write about these effects in the same place. [[User:Jonpatterns|Jonpatterns]] ([[User talk:Jonpatterns|talk]]) 10:02, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
[[Trade creation]] and trade diversion are (EDIT) related effects of same concept. It makes sense to use one article to write about these effects in the same place. [[User:Jonpatterns|Jonpatterns]] ([[User talk:Jonpatterns|talk]]) 10:02, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
:'''Oppose''' on the grounds that diversion and creation are different independently notable concepts. I accept that they are linked because they both arise as consequences of the formation of some form of customs union. They are already appropriately linked in the text as part of the [[template:trade bloc]] series (in the 'Policies' section). [[User:Klbrain|Klbrain]] ([[User talk:Klbrain|talk]]) 07:31, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
:'''Oppose''' on the grounds that diversion and creation are different independently notable concepts. I accept that they are linked because they both arise as consequences of the formation of some form of customs union. They are already appropriately linked in the text as part of the [[template:trade bloc]] series (in the 'Policies' section). [[User:Klbrain|Klbrain]] ([[User talk:Klbrain|talk]]) 07:31, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
{{discussion bottom}}


== References from AfD ==
== References from AfD ==

Revision as of 17:00, 29 May 2019

WikiProject iconEconomics Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconTrade Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Trade, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Trade on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TradeWikipedia:WikiProject TradeTemplate:WikiProject TradeTrade
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

New Zealand Lamb Example

Are there any sources for any of this section? I've never seen French lamb in UK supermarkets, whereas New Zealand lamb is widespread when English or Welsh lamb is out of season, and France produces far less lamb than the UK or New Zealand do according to the lamb Wikipedia page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.176.105.152 (talk) 09:32, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

According to statistics from the UK's Agriculture and Horticulture Development board (http://beefandlamb.ahdb.org.uk/markets/industry-reports/uk-statistics/), the UK currently imports 5 times as much lamb from outside the EU as it does from inside the EU, with the largest EU supplier of lamb (Ireland) being around 1/7th the size of New Zealand, a situation that has been the case for several years. In light of this, I think it's unlikely that New Zealand lamb imports being replaced with French lamb imports is an example of trade diversion.

Merge from Trade creation

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was no consensus to merge. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 17:00, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Trade creation and trade diversion are (EDIT) related effects of same concept. It makes sense to use one article to write about these effects in the same place. Jonpatterns (talk) 10:02, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose on the grounds that diversion and creation are different independently notable concepts. I accept that they are linked because they both arise as consequences of the formation of some form of customs union. They are already appropriately linked in the text as part of the template:trade bloc series (in the 'Policies' section). Klbrain (talk) 07:31, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

References from AfD

Possibly useful reference from the ArticleForDeletion dicussion:

Jonpatterns (talk) 16:41, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Trade_diversion&oldid=899377617"