User talk:Useddenim/Archive 9

Longueau-Boulogne RDT

Longueau–Boulogne railway
176.0 Abbeville Réseau des Bains de Mer to Dompierre-sur-Authie to Le Tréport-Mers

Abbeville needs a tweak. The Réseau de Bains de Mer had a metre gauge line heading from Abbeville station to Dompierre-sur-Authie. Needs to be from left side of station heading down the diagram. Can't work out how to do it. Mjroots (talk) 11:03, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

@Mjroots: Is this correct? Useddenim (talk) 12:19, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

Apart from my bad French (now fixed), yes. Mjroots (talk) 12:48, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

List of railway lines in France

Hi, I just reverted your edit on List of railway lines in France again. This is a list article, that shouldn't contain detailed information like the {{Auray-Quiberon railway diagram}}. See also Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists. You are invited to create an article about that railway, see similar articles like Savenay–Landerneau railway for inspiration. Markussep ^Talk 08:50, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Request template for Charlotte, North Carolina Bus Rapid Transit

Hello Useddenim, I notice you have edited the Template:LYNX Red Line in the past and was wondering if you could create a new template for what is now the I-77 Bus Rapid Transit, which is replacing the LYNX Red Line for the near term. Here is the link of the current propose route and the former Red Line, as you can see it is two stations fewer. I'm not ready to rename the article from the Red Line as of yet though because the BRT could be labeled the Red Line as well or not. If you can make one, I would be most appreciative, but cannot I understand. Thank you! --WashuOtaku (talk) 23:21, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

@Washuotaku:  Done (Template:I-77 BRT). Useddenim (talk) 22:51, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Thank you very much!!! --WashuOtaku (talk) 00:35, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

Bedford railway station, if you have time?

There is a discussion at Talk:Bedford railway station#Incorrect diagram in which some editors are looking for help to resolve a flat crossing, in the unlikely event that you have a few moments to evaluate? Thank you either way. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 13:00, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

Template : Llanelly Railway and Dock Company

I would like you to add Whitemill station (opened January 1867-closed October 1870) between Abergwili and Nantgaredig to the branch line on the template. It is shown in Wignall's "Complete British Railway Atlas and Gazeteer" (1981 edition) and it also appears in the text matter of the Wikipedia article on this railway in the topography section of this branch line.

I am not well versed enough to make the required edit as the convoluted computer script in that part of the template needs careful adjustments.

Xenophon Philosopher (talk) 19:54, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

 Done. Useddenim (talk) 20:49, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Template : Llanelly Railway and Dock Company

I note that on the Brynamman branch line, there was Gelliceidrim station (opened November 1851 - closed December 1861) situated in-between Garnant Halt and Glanamman.

It appears in WIGNALL'S "Complete British Railway Atlas and Gazeteer" (1981 edition) and also appears in the text matter of the Wikipedia article on this railway in the topography section of this branch line.

I would like you to add this station to the template, as stated in my previous entry, I am not well versed enough to make the required edit as the convoluted computer script in that part of the template needs careful adjustments.

Xenophon Philosopher (talk) 07:05, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

 Done. Useddenim (talk) 09:27, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Template:Stnd

Courtesy notice: Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 April 19#Template:Stnd. YLSS is long gone and you do more work in this space than anyone else. Best, Mackensen (talk) 00:07, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

Edits on London Underground rolling stock numbering and classification

The mentioning of the East London line was outdated information, not historic information, so that's why I removed it. C2A (Homebase | Telephone | Site changes) 06:04, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
Also removing lots of content from a page is considered vandalism. (I only removed a small portion) C2A (Homebase | Telephone | Site changes) 06:06, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

@C2A: You DO NOT get to decide what other editors choose to keep (or remove) from their own talk pages. Useddenim (talk) 12:46, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

WP:DISRUPT Please keep calm and stop assuming bad faith. WP:AGF C2A (Homebase | Telephone | Site changes) 06:35, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

@C2A: I'm sorry, however given your continuing edits on my talk page, at this point I have no choice but to start assuming bad faith on your part. Useddenim (talk) 21:52, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

I agree. Y'all gotta calm down or just take it to ANI. –Daybeers (talk) 01:59, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

Ok, I accept. C2A (Homebase | Telephone | Site changes) 06:24, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited PCC streetcar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ASJ (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

PCC streetcar

I undid your changes as they appear to be major, per WP:BRD please take the discussion to the talk-page. I read WP:MOSFLAG by the way I don't see how any of the criteria against inclusion would apply per "In lists or tables, flag icons may be relevant when such representation of different subjects is pertinent to the purpose of the list or table itself". The flags do not serve as a nationalistic purpose as many of them are former countries. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 00:20, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Section 10

Please always read the edit summary before undoing others changes. C2A (About | Call | Inspect) 05:15, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

April 2019

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on London Underground rolling stock numbering and classification and User talk:C2A. Thank you. C2A (Homebase | Telephone | Site changes) 05:52, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

@C2A: It's not good faith when someone's error has been pointed out to them yet they insist on making the same change over and over again. Useddenim (talk) 12:41, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

@C2A: Neither is blanking your talk page and then hectoring the person who posted the message. BE CAREFUL with your accusations. Useddenim (talk) 12:54, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Do You think bad faith means keeping an article up to date? C2A (Homebase | Telephone | Site changes) 14:08, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Also, I wasn't making any error. I was doing the right thing. C2A (Homebase | Telephone | Site changes) 14:10, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

@C2A: Repeatedly removing information is disruptive editing. Period. Useddenim (talk) 14:23, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Only if the editer assumes bad faith, which I wasn't doing. C2A (Homebase | Telephone | Site changes) 05:28, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

Please assume good faith in your dealings with other editors. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. C2A (Homebase | Telephone | Site changes) 06:38, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia.

This is per [1], I do not appreciate being accused of possible article ownership. Take a WP:BREAK, then come back and discuss by assuming good faith. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 17:32, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

@Knowledgekid87: And I do not appreciate having several hours of work trashed just because you like cutesy flag icons that add nothing to the article. Besides, they are direct contravention of MOS:FLAGCRUFT ("Do not emphasize nationality without good reason"). I'm not going to copy WP:ICONDECORATION into this reply, but using flag icons instead of text to identify countries is definitely in the "inappropriate use" category.

Furthermore, your overreaction (and that's an admin's opinion, not just mine) suggests a lack of WP:AGF on your part.

I think I will address the specifics of your editing behaviour at Talk:PCC streetcar#Recent reversion. Useddenim (talk) 17:45, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

Rail station template

Hi Useddenim! I saw your edits on the various Washington Metro line templates and saw you were using {{rws}} to link the VRE station. While this does work, it ends up as a redirect. I think you knew this, but U.S. stations no longer use the "xxx (xxx station)" format anymore. Using {{stl|VRE|L'Enfant}} would work. Just thought I'd let you know. Thanks for your work! –Daybeers (talk) 01:47, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

Thank you Daybeers. I know that Mackensen and others have been working their way through the templates, but I haven't been following their progress to carefully. So, unless I see that a system has been converted to {{stl}}/{{slk}}, I'm following the safe course and using {{rws}} which can handle all of the station disambiguation formats. Useddenim (talk) 03:24, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

Template : Brecon and Merthyr Railway

On the right side of the template there is a line running upwards from Bargoed, upon which there are three stations shown, but the topography shows that in-between Abertysswg station and Cwmsyfiog & Brithdir station, heading downwards, the following five stations should be added and shown on this template:-

• McLaren Colliery Halt...
• New Tredegar Colliery Platform...
• New Tredegar...
• Elliot Pit Halt...
• Cwmsyfiog Halt...

As I do not have the requisite computer skills to perform this task, noting the convoluted lines in the area, may I seek your assistance in performing this task.

Xenophon Philosopher (talk) 17:39, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

 Added. But, ‪Xenophon Philosopher‬, you neglected to indicate where the Cwmtysswg Colliery line crosses. Useddenim (talk) 04:31, 30 April 2019 (UTC)