Talk:Rurales: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 00:00, 10 June 2019

Mexico Unassessed

	Mexico portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Spain Unassessed

	Spain portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Split?

Per WP:NOTDIC, since we should be covering things and not terms and this article covers two things, it seems like we should split this into two articles, one on the Guardia Rural and one on the Cuerpo de Defensa Rural. Thoughts? — Æµ§œš¹ _{[lɛts b̥iː pʰəˈlaɪˀt]} 16:24, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A good idea - two distinct para-military forces performing different functions in different eras and with only the coincidence of a shared title to link them. Buistr (talk) 04:08, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not yet, not enough information on either to warrant a split.--Degen Earthfast (talk) 15:28, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Take a look at WP:CONSPLIT. This is a proposal to split because these are two separate topics, not because the article is getting too large. Both are notable and coverage so far seems neutral, but it's inappropriate to have one article covering different things just because they have the same name. — Æµ§œš¹ _{[lɛts b̥iː pʰəˈlaɪˀt]} 17:23, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am in favor of splitting. Amuseclio (talk) 00:00, 10 June 2019 (UTC)Amuseclio[reply]

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 * Not yet, not enough information on either to warrant a split.--[[User:Degen Earthfast|Degen Earthfast]] ([[User talk:Degen Earthfast|talk]]) 15:28, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
 :Take a look at [[WP:CONSPLIT]]. This is a proposal to split because these are two separate topics, not because the article is getting too large. Both are notable and coverage so far seems neutral, but it's inappropriate to have one article covering different things just because they have the same name. — [[User:Aeusoes1|Æµ§œš¹]] <span title="Representation in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA)" class="IPA">[[User talk:aeusoes1|<small><sub>[lɛts b̥iː pʰəˈlaɪˀt]</sub></small>]]</span> 17:23, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
+::I am in favor of splitting. [[User:Amuseclio|Amuseclio]] ([[User talk:Amuseclio|talk]]) 00:00, 10 June 2019 (UTC)Amuseclio