Jump to content

User talk:Moeron: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Werdnabot (talk | contribs)
m Automated archival of 3 sections to User talk:Moeron/Archive 3
Rotten Tomatoes
Line 48: Line 48:
==[[The Addams Family (Game Boy)]]==
==[[The Addams Family (Game Boy)]]==
You've tagged the screenshots with public-domain tags. Unless you can show that the developers/publishers released screenshots into the public domain, then I'm afraid that they're incorrectly tagged. They should be fair use, and include a rationale, like the cover-art. - [[User:Hahnchen|Hahnch]][[Evil|<span title="WP:Esperanza"><font color="green">e</font></span>]][[User:Hahnchen|n]] 18:05, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
You've tagged the screenshots with public-domain tags. Unless you can show that the developers/publishers released screenshots into the public domain, then I'm afraid that they're incorrectly tagged. They should be fair use, and include a rationale, like the cover-art. - [[User:Hahnchen|Hahnch]][[Evil|<span title="WP:Esperanza"><font color="green">e</font></span>]][[User:Hahnchen|n]] 18:05, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

== Rotten Tomatoes ==

If you'd look at http://www.rottentomatoes.com/vine/showthread.php?t=522430, you would see that the users of Rotten Tomatoes agree with the edits.

Revision as of 05:38, 26 November 2006

User:Moeron/Status

This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 14 days are automatically archived to User talk:Moeron/Archive 3. Sections with less than two timestamps (that have not been replied to) are not archived.

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting -- ~~~~ at the end.
Start a new talk topic.
Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page. Please use headlines when starting new talk topics. Thank you.

WARNING!
Your comments MAY wind up deleted if:
- You do not sign your comments
- You leave unclear comments
- Make disparaging remarks

(Unless they are comical, then they may stay)


Archive
Archives
  1. February - June 2006
  2. July - August 2006
  3. September 2006 -

Talk pages

[1]: In general, you should not correct people's spelling on talk pages. - Jmabel | Talk 04:19, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fakir005's request

Noticed your reply to Fakir005's request regarding Zedo on ANI [2]. In case you're interested, there's a considerable backstory here and here. Don't want to pull you in, but just in case... --ZimZalaBim (talk) 03:13, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Genesis and Sega CD

Hello, could you please explain me why exactly you're removing the Sega Genesis and Sega CD from articles? I'm a bit confused here since the names were about equal well known/unknown. --32X 02:43, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am fixing so that they don't go to Sega Mega Drive/Sega Genesis ... I am trying to keep everything else that same, so if something gets messed up with the post linkage, please feel free to fix it (ie. If it was changed to [[Sega Mega Drive]] and should be [[Sega Mega Drive|Genesis]]). -- moe.RON Let's talk | done 02:46, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Donkey Rhubarb

Hey, what's the deal with removing the Youtube vid for Donkey Rhubarb? How am I vandalizing the site by showing people the video that the article described? 24.56.223.4 04:47, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your concern, please see WP:V, WP:OR and, specifically, WP:RS#YouTube. -- moe.RON Let's talk | done 04:49, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Have you lost your mind? I understand that maybe showing people some youtube video that claims to have "facts about the JFK assassination" could be a problem when trying to be accurate, but when the article spells out what to expect to see when you see the video, and the video delivers just that, how much of a problem can there be? Do you require verificaton from RDJ himself or something? This adherence to pointless beaurocracy is more nonsense than the average piece of vandalism. 24.56.223.4 04:55, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You've tagged the screenshots with public-domain tags. Unless you can show that the developers/publishers released screenshots into the public domain, then I'm afraid that they're incorrectly tagged. They should be fair use, and include a rationale, like the cover-art. - Hahnchen 18:05, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rotten Tomatoes

If you'd look at http://www.rottentomatoes.com/vine/showthread.php?t=522430, you would see that the users of Rotten Tomatoes agree with the edits.