Talk:Nuestra Señora de la Concepción: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 06:16, 26 November 2006

I have put this explanation separately from Spitfire and HMS_Spitfire because the euphemism needs explaining, but even now some people object to unexpectedly coming actoss the word "shit". Anthony Appleyard 05:46, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Revert the page move?

I do not think that the present title is very apt. I believe, it should be reverted back to Cacafuego. Or, perhaps, Cagafuego, for that matter. Any objections? --Dart evader 16:24, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As no one objected, I've moved it back to 'Cacafuego'. Dart evader 06:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 06:13, 26 November 2006 edit Dart evader (talk \| contribs) 400 edits m moved Talk:Cacafuego, Cagafuego (Galleon, Nuestra Señora de la Concepción) to Talk:Cacafuego: reverted to former title ← Previous edit		Revision as of 06:16, 26 November 2006 edit undo Dart evader (talk \| contribs) 400 edits →Revert the page move? Next edit →
Line 4:		Line 4:

	I do not think that the present title is very apt. I believe, it should be reverted back to ''Cacafuego''. Or, perhaps, ''Cagafuego'', for that matter. Any objections? --[[User:Dart evader\|Dart evader]] 16:24, 13 November 2006 (UTC)		I do not think that the present title is very apt. I believe, it should be reverted back to ''Cacafuego''. Or, perhaps, ''Cagafuego'', for that matter. Any objections? --[[User:Dart evader\|Dart evader]] 16:24, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

			As no one objected, I've moved it back to 'Cacafuego'. [[User:Dart evader\|Dart evader]] 06:16, 26 November 2006 (UTC)