Talk:Bellis perennis: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 12:05, 14 June 2019

Template:Vital article

Plants C‑class Mid‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Gallery

I am not sure that this article needs a gallery. What it clearly doesn't need is a gallery of every available photo of a "daisy", regardless of species. --Hans Adler (talk) 20:59, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ray florets

Under "Growth" was the statement that the flower has 15-30 ray florets, referenced to Encycopaedia Britannica. The reference was discussing the family not the individual species. Anyone who has daisies in their lawn can confirm that the count for B. perennis is more like 30-50 but I can't find a reference for that so I just deleted the misleading numbers.Newburyjohn (talk) 19:41, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Etymology

There's a discrepancy about the genus name, Bellis. One section says it's Latin for "pretty", while the next says that it refers to war or battle. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.6.225.113 (talk) 16:36, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bellis perennis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121028182151/http://www.medicinegarden.com/homeopathy/bellis_perennis_menopause.html to http://www.medicinegarden.com/homeopathy/bellis_perennis_menopause.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:58, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Minor Edit

I added a section on plant fertilization as part of a class learning how to create citations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Proper Bobcat (talk • contribs) 23:09, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Invasive?

Under “Cultivation”, the article states that the plant is invasive, without specifying the country/countries. In the introduction it states that it’s native in Western Europe and introduced in several countries over the world, but the Cultivation section seems to be too focussed on the perspective of one unspecified country. Does anyone know what country they talk about? Arjane92 (talk) 12:05, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 30: / Line 30: @@
 I added a section on plant fertilization as part of a class learning how to create citations.  <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Proper Bobcat|Proper Bobcat]] ([[User talk:Proper Bobcat#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Proper Bobcat|contribs]]) 23:09, 22 October 2018 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+== Invasive? ==
+Under “Cultivation”, the article states that the plant is invasive, without specifying the country/countries. In the introduction it states that it’s native in Western Europe and introduced in several countries over the world, but the Cultivation section seems to be too focussed on the perspective of one unspecified country. Does anyone know what country they talk about? [[User:Arjane92|Arjane92]] ([[User talk:Arjane92|talk]]) 12:05, 14 June 2019 (UTC)