Certification mark: Difference between revisions
Jerome Kohl (talk | contribs) |
→Certification marks distinguished from other marks: Corrected a faulty wikilink and corrected the spelling Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Certification marks differ from [[collective trade marks]]. Collective trade marks may be used by particular members of the organization that owns them, while certification marks are the only evidence of the existence of follow-up agreements between manufacturers and nationally accredited testing and certification organizations. In some occasions, the certification organization will charge for the use of their labels and will require that the manufacturer reports the exact production quantities.{{citation needed|date=February 2013}} In this case, the certification organization can be seen to earn a commission from sales of products under their follow-up regimes. In return, the use of the certification marks ''enables'' the product sales in the first place. |
Certification marks differ from [[collective trade marks]]. Collective trade marks may be used by particular members of the organization that owns them, while certification marks are the only evidence of the existence of follow-up agreements between manufacturers and nationally accredited testing and certification organizations. In some occasions, the certification organization will charge for the use of their labels and will require that the manufacturer reports the exact production quantities.{{citation needed|date=February 2013}} In this case, the certification organization can be seen to earn a commission from sales of products under their follow-up regimes. In return, the use of the certification marks ''enables'' the product sales in the first place. |
||
Certification is often mistakenly referred to as an ''approval'', which is not true. Organizations such as [[Underwriters Laboratories]], [[ |
Certification is often mistakenly referred to as an ''approval'', which is not true. Organizations such as [[Underwriters Laboratories]], [[TÜV Rheinland]], [[NTA Inc]], and [[CSA International]] will test the products according to standard procedures, and "list" them as compliant to that standard. They do not ''approve'' anything except the use of the mark to show that a product has been certified for compliance with such specific standard. Thus, for instance, a product certification mark for a [[fire door]] or for a spray [[fireproofing]] product, does not signify its universal acceptance for use within a [[building]]. Approvals are up to the [[Authority Having Jurisdiction]] (AHJ), such as a municipal building inspector or fire prevention officer. Conversely, [[FM Global]] does use the term "Approvals" for its certification listings, which are intended for use of the products within [[building]]s that are insured by FM Global. The German accreditor Deutsches Institut für Bautechnik (DIBt)<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.dibt.de/|title=DIBt – Deutsches Institut für Bautechnik|publisher=}}</ref> issues "Approvals" for [[system]]s. All of these listed products must conform to [[listing and approval use and compliance]]. |
||
For various reasons, usually relating to technical issues, certification marks are difficult to register, especially in relation to services. One practical [[workaround]] for trademark owners is to register the mark as an ordinary trademark in relation to quality control and similar services. |
For various reasons, usually relating to technical issues, certification marks are difficult to register, especially in relation to services. One practical [[workaround]] for trademark owners is to register the mark as an ordinary trademark in relation to quality control and similar services. |
Revision as of 11:11, 20 June 2019
This article needs additional citations for verification. (September 2010) |
A certification mark (or conformity mark) on a commercial product indicates the existence of an accepted product standard or regulation and a claim that the manufacturer has verified compliance with those standards or regulations. The specific specification, test methods, and frequency of testing are published by the standards organization. Certification listing does not necessarily guarantee fitness for use.
Certification marks distinguished from other marks
Certification marks differ from collective trade marks. Collective trade marks may be used by particular members of the organization that owns them, while certification marks are the only evidence of the existence of follow-up agreements between manufacturers and nationally accredited testing and certification organizations. In some occasions, the certification organization will charge for the use of their labels and will require that the manufacturer reports the exact production quantities.[citation needed] In this case, the certification organization can be seen to earn a commission from sales of products under their follow-up regimes. In return, the use of the certification marks enables the product sales in the first place.
Certification is often mistakenly referred to as an approval, which is not true. Organizations such as Underwriters Laboratories, TÜV Rheinland, NTA Inc, and CSA International will test the products according to standard procedures, and "list" them as compliant to that standard. They do not approve anything except the use of the mark to show that a product has been certified for compliance with such specific standard. Thus, for instance, a product certification mark for a fire door or for a spray fireproofing product, does not signify its universal acceptance for use within a building. Approvals are up to the Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ), such as a municipal building inspector or fire prevention officer. Conversely, FM Global does use the term "Approvals" for its certification listings, which are intended for use of the products within buildings that are insured by FM Global. The German accreditor Deutsches Institut für Bautechnik (DIBt)[1] issues "Approvals" for systems. All of these listed products must conform to listing and approval use and compliance.
For various reasons, usually relating to technical issues, certification marks are difficult to register, especially in relation to services. One practical workaround for trademark owners is to register the mark as an ordinary trademark in relation to quality control and similar services.
Certification marks can be owned by independent companies absolutely unrelated in ownership to the companies, offering goods or rendering services under the particular certification mark.
Regulations
Trademark laws in countries, such as the United States,[2] Australia[3] and others that provide for the filing of applications to register certificate marks also usually require the submission of regulations, which define a number of issues,[citation needed] including:
- People authorized to use the certification mark
- Characteristics that the certification mark certifies
- How the certification or standards tests these characteristics and supervises use of the mark
- What the dispute resolution procedures are
The main purpose of the regulations is to protect consumers against misleading practices.[citation needed]
Examples
Primary jurisdiction | Body/mark | Image |
---|---|---|
International |
|
|
Australia |
|
|
Belgium |
|
CEBEC |
Canada |
|
|
China |
|
|
Eurasian Customs Union |
|
|
Europe |
|
|
France |
|
|
Germany |
|
|
India |
|
|
Japan |
|
|
Mexico | ||
Norway |
|
|
CIS |
| |
Sweden |
|
|
Taiwan |
|
|
Ukraine |
|
|
United Kingdom |
|
|
United States |
|
|
International treaties and certification marks
Many jurisdictions have been required to amend their trade mark legislation to accommodate protection of certification marks under the TRIPs treaty.
Some jurisdictions recognise certification marks from other jurisdictions. This means good manufactured in one country may need not go through certification in another. One example is the European Union recognition of Australia and New Zealand marks based on an International treaty.[6]
Cases
Cases involving certification marks include:
- Re Legal Aid Board's Trade Mark Application (unreported 3 October 2000, UK CA)
- the Sea Island Cotton case [1989]RPC 87
See also
- Certification listing
- Certification marks in India
- Collective trade marks
- Fire protection
- Hallmark
- Listing and approval use and compliance
- Passive fire protection
- Product certification
- Trademark
References
- ^ "DIBt – Deutsches Institut für Bautechnik".
- ^ "Submission of the United States of America Certification and Collective Marks Formalities" (PDF). World Intellectual Property Organisation. February 2009. Retrieved 13 June 2017.
{{cite web}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|dead-url=
(help) - ^ "Certification trade marks". Australian Competition and Consumer Commission. Retrieved 13 June 2017.
{{cite web}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|dead-url=
(help) - ^ "Allergy Standards". allergystandards.com Allergy Standards.
- ^ "Allergy Standards". allergystandards.com Allergy Standards.
- ^ “Agreement on Mutual Recognition in relation to Conformity Assessment, Certificates and Markings between Australia and the European Community ATS 2 of 1999“. Australasian Legal Information Institute, Australian Treaties Library. Retrieved on 15 April 2017.
External links
- List of Standard Certification Marks – description of the most common standard certification marks
- Risknowlogy Certification Marks – certification marks for risk, reliability, safety and SIL related products, solutions, services, organisations and professionals