User talk:Soltesh: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 12:19, 22 June 2019

Welcome!

Hello, Soltesh, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Beeblebrox (talk) 16:49, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Halle Mordu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Halle Mordu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Halle Mordu until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 13:28, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 9janimi Channel has been accepted

9janimi Channel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

—UY Scuti ^Talk 10:24, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Refund

Per your request I have restored the article and moved it to your userspace, you can find the article at User:Soltesh/Joejo. TomStar81 (Talk) 05:40, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Idia Aisien

The article Idia Aisien has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There is no way a person born today can be notable and/or be a television presenter and model.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ∼∼∼∼ Eric0928^Talk 19:33, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of ONYC Hair

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on ONYC Hair, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for Deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 23:26, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Do Take Note

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was Thelma Okoro, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Celestina007 (talk) 22:10, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vumomse moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Vumomse, does not have enough sources and citations as written to establish notability. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources that speak to the individual's notability. (?) I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. Nihlus 06:13, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing

I missed your enquiry. Anyone can review articles. Try copy editting a few dozen. You can also give constructive criticism on talk pages. Victuallers (talk) 10:04, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Signing posts

Hi Soltesh. Thank you for your contributions to AFD discussions. I just want to let you know that I find your deliberate method of allowing bots to sign your posts quite unique, but also confusing. Keep up the good work! Regards. HandsomeBoy (talk) 01:59, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AFC Help User Space --> Main Space

Hi Soltesh,

Please I'm also contributing to Nigerian related articles on the encyclopedia i need help moving a new article from "User Space" to "Main Space". Here - JIMOH WAXIU

Kareemarh (talk) 10:15, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kareemarh per your request have moved your articled to the Main Space Draft, another editor/admin will help you confirm it as a Nigeria related stub.

Good Luck! Is Nutin (talk) 10:40, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Soltesh: I’m grateful.

Kareemarh (talk) 13:35, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 16:01, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Soltesh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi, I think I have probably crossed the lines and I apologize, am a member of the Nigerian WikiProject and the said new user Kareemarh ask for my help today for two things, 1. One being are recently created article which was accepted into the AFC Glenn Mena and later deleted today as it is similar to the last version which was deleted, I asked for her to explain what she knows about the previous which she even clarified as the new version she wrote without knowing about the old one was done through assistance on the Wikipedia live help, hence she doesn’t know what next todo she disclosed her login details to me (I authoritative denied are request but later accepted and I mentioned I could spear her just 10 mins of my time to speak to the deleting admin) after which she should change her password. 2. The second being a new draft article which was made on her user space and she needed help moving to main space draft, I also help her doing that from my own account, she further requested for review and I specifically told her I can only proof read, make corrections but I do not have the nessesary rights to review or accept an article, and for now I’m only working on AFD’s, as I simply asked another editor who is a member of the Nigerian WikiProject to further help her, hence it’s also a Nigeria related article. However I accept my mistakes and i effusively apologize again that such won’t be done again as my account is over 6 years old and I have never violated any Wikipedia guidelines for Editors, I’d appreciate if my account can be restored back to normal. Thanks.

Decline reason:

None of this explains how there is technical evidence for the abuse of multiple accounts. Huon (talk) 19:25, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Request Reason

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Soltesh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi again, sorry i had to clarify the entire situation and if it’s not clear enough to explain the technical abuse, in summary of what I said earlier, I want to again state that the two accounts where accessed from the same IP which resulted to the technical abuse, I have resolved the said issue, and am sure such won’t happen again. I hope this explains better (as I’m also finding it difficult to understand the word “technical abuse” do forgive my ignorance on this) and I look forward to your favorable response with many thanks. Is Nutin (talk) 19:36, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

How have you resolved the said issue? Why won't it happen again? Yunshui ^雲 _水 09:10, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi Yunshui Have decided to take cautions on the Request for assistance I’d be rendering, per Wikipedia community guidelines I will never use multiple account on the community again. Have learnt my lessons and I can assure you this won’t happen again.

Is Nutin (talk) 09:30, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What assistance will you be rendering, exactly? Yunshui ^雲 _水 09:31, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yunshui usually I correct typos on existing articles, i fix dead links and I also contribute on the AFD’s that concerns Nigerian related articles, sometimes Entertainment related ones, I also assist new Nigerian users to fact check and proof read their first articles on the encyclopedia before asking them to go ahead with their submissions to the AFC that is if they meet WP Basic requirements to ascertain notability.

Hence my contributions are always Entertainment related, same as most of my assistance. Is Nutin (talk) 09:37, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Soltesh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Per Yunshui response on my last request for unblock on how I have resolved the said issue and what steps have I taken for such not to happen again, I have responded on my talk page and he seem to be offline. This was my response: “Have decided to take cautions on the Request for assistance I’d be rendering, per Wikipedia community guidelines I will never use multiple account on the community again. Have learnt my lessons and I can assure you this won’t happen again.” And I clearly stated that I have never broken any Wikipedia community guideline with my 6 years of using the platform, either on the articles I created which I wrote from a neutral point of view being a writer or the times I have contributed to Nigerian Entertainment related articles that have either been created and I helped in fixing dead links or typos on them or my contributions on AFD’s, again I’d like to appeal effusively that cautions have been taken and my account be unblocked. Thanks! Is Nutin (talk) 8:43 am, 5 December 2018, Wednesday (15 days ago) (UTC+0)

Decline reason:

Your explanation doesn't match the checkuser evidence. If two different people used the Kareemarh account, we would have different signs, but we don't. Only one person has used the Kareemarh account, and that person is the same person who used the Soltesh account. SilkTork (talk) 16:44, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Bbb23: Would you mind reviewing this block? If I'm following correctly, Kareemarh requested help with an article that got speedied, and gave her login credentials to Soltesh over IRC. Soltesh then used her account to leave talk page messages for the deleting admin and other editors involved. This is a pretty clear violation of WP:NOSHARING, but not sockpuppetry per se. Moreover, I'm not seeing the actual harm done here. Seems like a productive editor who made a mistake and has acknowledged it. -- Scott (talk) 21:58, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Yunshui: What are your thoughts? One problem I have with the user's explanation is they were not just editing from the same IP. They appear to have been using the same device.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:41, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23: I concur. I have reason to be somewhat suspicious of multiple accounts editing from this location, since I know of at least one paid editing ring operating multiple accounts from this user's area. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:05, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Yunshui: I hav never been paid for editing since I start editing on the encyclopedia, my case here is particularly different, I have admitted to editing with the other said user account per request from the user, I have clearly stated repeatedly that such would never happen again, please I’m appealing sincerely from the uprightness of my heart that such wont happen again, please be considerate and tender your resolve with mercy, I recently joined the Nigeria’s WikiProject which I was invited to and I do not know about any syndicate performing such action, we should also understand that we have few service providers in Nigeria and IP probably might be same for some number of users.

Appreciative! - Is Nutin (talk) 08:12, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Based on your comments, I'm unwilling to unblock you. First, you haven't been editing for six years on Wikipedia with this account - more like 4.5 years. Second, in that time, you have a grand total of 261 live edits, of which only 157 are to article space. You also have 88 deleted edits, which are mainly you creating pages that were not deemed suitable for Wikipedia. Third, your comment about creating a new account is a threat to continue socking; that alone is unacceptable. Finally, you accuse people of "bias", which is not conducive to collaborating appropriately in this environment. I suggest you get on with your life as you previously considered doing and forget about editing at Wikipedia; it apparently isn't a venue that is good for you or for the project.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:42, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bbb23 Firstly I never accused anyone of being biased, it was a lite statement out of frustration. 2. Secondly I never threatened to create another account, I only said if I had never wanted to appeal and create another account I’d have done so, I didn’t consider that option. 3. I don’t see how someone in my position won’t be as frustrated as this, it’s been over two weeks I have been appealing and no one was talking to me, I’d appreciate if you’d reconsider your decision and forgive my ignorance if you got my message the wrong way.

What I think was the most important was that I admitted to my wrong and I apologized, I still kept on appealing even right now as am typing this. I apologize whole heartedly. - Thanks! Is Nutin (talk) 01:48, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

- @Bbb23: I have retracted my previous comment, I said it was due to some sort of frustration and I sincerely apologize over my previous comment, I’d gladly appreciate your reconsideration based on @Scott Burley: Request.

Thanks! Is Nutin (talk) 07:56, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@SilkTork: There's nothing more to say, hence I have been appealing please I’d like to request another chance and I promise such won’t happen again. Please give me the benefit of doubts and allow me indulge you, kindly unblock my account. If there’s anything else you’d like me todo, let me know. Thanks - Is Nutin (talk) 16:56, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sometimes people make a mistake. Provided they are open and honest, we are often willing to give people a second chance. You have made three appeals in which you have attempted to deceive us. Four experienced Wikipedia admins have looked into your situation, and you have attempted to mislead all of us. At this point you have lost our trust. We will not consider any more appeals at the moment because we cannot trust what you say. Integrity is required to edit Wikipedia. The route open to you now is our "Standard offer". Wait six months, and make another appeal along the lines outlined in Wikipedia:Standard offer. We would expect you to explain why you created two accounts, and to declare if you are a paid contributor per Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure. The more open and honest you are, the more likely it is that the community will let you back in; but bear in mind that the community do take a very dim view of paid contributors who have edited without disclosing, have operated sock accounts, and have lied about it. You will need to be very open and honest to get back in.

I must stress that there is no point in appealing any more at this point, and if you make another appeal, it is likely that your talkpage access will be removed. You have taken up enough of people's time as it is. Try again in six months. SilkTork (talk) 17:23, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@SilkTork: I’m deeply sorry for all the inconveniences caused, It was just that what I do during my leisure lately was taken away from me.

If 6 months is the ultimate price to pay for all the troubles I must have caused, I’m willing to pay it. Thanks for throwing more lights @SilkTork:, @Bbb23: sorry for the way I also did spoke to you, do accept my sincerest apology.

Highest Regards! - Is Nutin (talk) 17:44, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @SilkTork:, it's been 6 months, can i re-appeal again now? Thanks - Is Nutin (talk) 10:55, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No. It has not been six months. You can appeal again after June 21st. SilkTork (talk) 11:24, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @SilkTork:, Trust you are good? Should i go ahead and appeal again? thanks Is Nutin (talk) 12:18, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 144: / Line 144: @@
 :::: Hi {{ping|SilkTork}}, it's been 6 months, can i re-appeal again now? Thanks - [[User:Soltesh|Is Nutin]] ([[User talk:Soltesh#top|talk]]) 10:55, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
 No. It has not been six months. You can appeal again after June 21st. [[User:SilkTork|SilkTork]] ([[User talk:SilkTork|talk]]) 11:24, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
+::::: Hi {{ping|SilkTork}}, Trust you are good? Should i go ahead and appeal again? thanks [[User:Soltesh|Is Nutin]] ([[User talk:Soltesh#top|talk]]) 12:18, 22 June 2019 (UTC)