Talk:The Water Table (poetry collection): Difference between revisions
→Content: signature |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
I've found some more information about the poem: [https://www.bloodaxebooks.com/ecs/product/the-water-table-947 [1<nowiki>]</nowiki>] [https://www.goodreads.com/en/book/show/7294586-the-water-table [2<nowiki>]</nowiki>] |
I've found some more information about the poem: [https://www.bloodaxebooks.com/ecs/product/the-water-table-947 [1<nowiki>]</nowiki>] [https://www.goodreads.com/en/book/show/7294586-the-water-table [2<nowiki>]</nowiki>] |
||
The first website contains some reviews that could have a section in your article, as well as a couple videos of the author explaining the meaning behind two poems in the book. The second website gives a preview of the introduction of the book. You could create a section on who the poem is dedicated to and provide a brief description on how many poems the book contains (since there seems to be no specific structure for the book.) |
The first website contains some reviews that could have a section in your article, as well as a couple videos of the author explaining the meaning behind two poems in the book. The second website gives a preview of the introduction of the book. You could create a section on who the poem is dedicated to and provide a brief description on how many poems the book contains (since there seems to be no specific structure for the book.) [[User:C.lasia|C.lasia]] ([[User talk:C.lasia|talk]]) 16:07, 1 July 2019 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 16:07, 1 July 2019
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 June 2019 and 31 July 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): User:HistoryNerd52 (article contribs).
Note
OK, this needs work. The citation templates are messed up: don't try to stick in an AUM libproxy URL. Get the complete bibliographic information and put that in the citation--pure but clean and correct text inside <ref>...</ref> is better than a useless (sorry, but that's useless: no one off-campus can get anywhere with it) url incorrectly stuck into a template. You need a section on the Content, a section maybe on form, structure, organization, etc. Dr Aaij (talk) 02:14, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
There really isn't a lot to review here, but the few things that I do notice about the lead is you can add a wikilink to the T. S. Elliot award in the lead. You also don't "have" to cite it in the lead if you're going to cite it further in the article. I would highly suggest using {user| Dr. Aaij}'s article as a reference to add the different sections and style that you could and should follow for this article to make it "GA" and acceptable for a passing grade. The theme section is definitely going in the right direction, but see if you can find a segment of the article that further proves your point. Good luck with the article and let me know if you need help. Cjefferys (talk) 16:04, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Content
I've found some more information about the poem: [1] [2] The first website contains some reviews that could have a section in your article, as well as a couple videos of the author explaining the meaning behind two poems in the book. The second website gives a preview of the introduction of the book. You could create a section on who the poem is dedicated to and provide a brief description on how many poems the book contains (since there seems to be no specific structure for the book.) C.lasia (talk) 16:07, 1 July 2019 (UTC)