Talk:AllOfMP3.com legality: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 18:00, 27 November 2006

This article should be expanded with information that AllOfMp3 has provided in their new legality FAQ. They specifically state that they have studied the situation with regard to importation into the US and they believe it is legal.

They also explain why labels may be having trouble withdrawing works from ROMS, etc... apparently in Russia the right to distribute online is a separate right, and most labels never got that permission from the artist, therefore the artist is the only one that can rightfully withdraw in some cases.

AllofMp3 is also providing payments directly to artists, something that they say is not required by law. I guess they idea is that if indeed the artist is the one with the right to withdraw, it might be good to butter them up by giving them better payments than they ever would get after it filtered through collective license and then the label. Gigs 18:00, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 17:58, 27 November 2006 edit Gigs (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 15,455 edits Article needs attention, comments.		Revision as of 18:00, 27 November 2006 edit undo Gigs (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 15,455 edits mNo edit summary Next edit →
Line 3:		Line 3:
	They also explain why labels may be having trouble withdrawing works from ROMS, etc... apparently in Russia the right to distribute online is a separate right, and most labels never got that permission from the artist, therefore the artist is the only one that can rightfully withdraw in some cases.		They also explain why labels may be having trouble withdrawing works from ROMS, etc... apparently in Russia the right to distribute online is a separate right, and most labels never got that permission from the artist, therefore the artist is the only one that can rightfully withdraw in some cases.

	AllofMp3 is also providing payments directly to artists, something that they say is not required by law. I guess they idea is that if indeed the artist is the one with the right to withdraw, it might be good to butter them up by giving them better payments than they ever would get after it filtered through collective license and then the label.		AllofMp3 is also providing payments directly to artists, something that they say is not required by law. I guess they idea is that if indeed the artist is the one with the right to withdraw, it might be good to butter them up by giving them better payments than they ever would get after it filtered through collective license and then the label. [[User:Gigs\|Gigs]] 18:00, 27 November 2006 (UTC)