Talk:Open Here/GA1: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
NightBag10 (talk | contribs) ←Created page with '==GA Review== {{Good article tools}} {{subst:GAN/subst|{{subst:PAGENAME}}}} '''Reviewer:''' [[User:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}]] (User...' |
NightBag10 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
<!-- Please add all review comments below this comment, and do not alter what is above. So that the review can be kept within a single section, please do not use level 2 headers (==...==) below to break up the review. Use level 3 (===...===), level 4 and so on.--> |
<!-- Please add all review comments below this comment, and do not alter what is above. So that the review can be kept within a single section, please do not use level 2 headers (==...==) below to break up the review. Use level 3 (===...===), level 4 and so on.--> |
||
Hi, I'll be reviewing this article, and judging from the quick look, it seems that it'll pass with flying colors. [[User:NightBag10|NightBag10]] ([[User talk:NightBag10|talk]]) 23:02, 5 July 2019 (UTC) |
Hi, I'll be reviewing this article, and judging from the quick look, it seems that it'll pass with flying colors. [[User:NightBag10|NightBag10]] ([[User talk:NightBag10|talk]]) 23:02, 5 July 2019 (UTC) |
||
Fantastic work Mr. {{u|Hunter Kahn}}! This article definitely passes the [[Wikipedia:Good article criteria|GA criteria]]. The only problem is citation number 8; it does not link to anything, other than that the article is perfect. [[User:NightBag10|NightBag10]] ([[User talk:NightBag10|talk]]) 23:28, 5 July 2019 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 23:29, 5 July 2019
GA Review
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: NightBag10 (talk · contribs) 23:02, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I'll be reviewing this article, and judging from the quick look, it seems that it'll pass with flying colors. NightBag10 (talk) 23:02, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
Fantastic work Mr. Hunter Kahn! This article definitely passes the GA criteria. The only problem is citation number 8; it does not link to anything, other than that the article is perfect. NightBag10 (talk) 23:28, 5 July 2019 (UTC)