Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kajol Aikat: Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by Wikilog007 - "Argument" |
Wikilog007 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
::*I have looked carefully at sources on page and searched diligently, and it is simply [[WP:TOOSOON]] for this young writer.[[User:E.M.Gregory|E.M.Gregory]] ([[User talk:E.M.Gregory|talk]]) 00:44, 12 July 2019 (UTC) |
::*I have looked carefully at sources on page and searched diligently, and it is simply [[WP:TOOSOON]] for this young writer.[[User:E.M.Gregory|E.M.Gregory]] ([[User talk:E.M.Gregory|talk]]) 00:44, 12 July 2019 (UTC) |
||
'''Keep''' The author is though young but not WP:TOOSOON The article was accepted on the main space years back and unnecessary editing happened in the course which is now corrected. Keep this article and mark it as a low priority biography. The author is nominated for Padma Shri so that is solely enough to establish his credibility at present. If not, then there are references from media houses like Hindustan Times and Telegraph which demonstrate the relevance and notability of this article to be an encyclopaedic acceptance. |
'''Keep''' The author is though young but not WP:TOOSOON The article was accepted on the main space years back and unnecessary editing happened in the course which is now corrected. Keep this article and mark it as a low priority biography. The author is nominated for Padma Shri so that is solely enough to establish his credibility at present. If not, then there are references from media houses like Hindustan Times and Telegraph which demonstrate the relevance and notability of this article to be an encyclopaedic acceptance. Also, irrespective of the nature of the account, the comments are valid. The lack of credibility that is repeatedly raised as an issue is not cited most of time. This article should stay. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Wikilog007|Wikilog007]] ([[User talk:Wikilog007#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Wikilog007|contribs]]) 02:40, 12 July 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Revision as of 02:45, 12 July 2019
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Kajol Aikat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable author yet. 2 reliable sources found but coverage is not significant. Present references are bogus - Twitter, Goodreads, Amazon, Facebook etc. Dial911 (talk) 03:33, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Dial911 (talk) 03:33, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Dial911 (talk) 03:33, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Dial911 (talk) 03:33, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
Keep Not a non-notable author. The author is found to be a bestselling author. Unwanted content and soures are now edited accordingly. The present references are from relaible sources including national media like Telegraph and Hindustan Times. Revalidate the article again and remove your nomination for deletion. Remove the article from AfD and close the template. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.30.156.42 (talk • contribs) — Example (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. The preceding unsigned comment was added at 07:57, 12 February 2009 (UTC).
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 07:59, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
Keep Not found to be a non-notable author unlike mentioned by Dial911. The author is a bestselling author. Unwanted content and sources are found to be edited accordingly. The present references are from relaible sources including national media like Telegraph and Hindustan Times. Revalidate the article again and remove your nomination for deletion. Remove the article from AfD and close the template. This article should stay in Wikipedia.— Example (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. The preceding unsigned comment was added at 07:57, 12 February 2009 (UTC).
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 07:22, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
- Delete fails WP:SIGCOV. Nothing at all in a gNews search [1]. The sole hit in a Proquest newspapers search is about a schoolgirl who "said she got inspired from well known writer Kajol Aikat who was a student of her school." As Nom wrote, we need sources.E.M.Gregory (talk) 01:05, 8 July 2019 (UTC)
Keep Check this out: https://m.telegraphindia.com/states/jharkhand/fighting-bullies-with-book/cid/1431280 E.M.GregoryPlease do your research throughly because it lacks efforts. Google news hits are not reliable enough to provide credible sources solely.— 47.30.227.5 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- A color story in the local edition of a paper. E.M.Gregory (talk) 12:06, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
- There are enough sources all over the internet and in the article (mentioned in references) that establish enough credibility to keep this article on Wikipedia. Remove the AfD nomination and keep this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.30.227.5 (talk) 22:58, 9 July 2019 (UTC) — Example (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. The preceding unsigned comment was added at 07:57, 12 February 2009 (UTC).
delete Sources don't meet WP:RS. Author isn't quite notable enough for a page. Ayepaolo (talk) 17:48, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
Keep invalid argument with no proper citation. Kajol Aikat has also been nominated for Padma Shri 2020, the fourth highest civilian honor in India. Check this: https://padmaawards.gov.in/CARD.ASPX?NOMINEEUID=E1142263ABF099489A2BF24C15B5656EB66E54C918EF367CD94F4DEACEBF274A&RAND=288121 Other references in the article carry enough credibility to have a page for the author. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.30.186.220 (talk) 01:29, 11 July 2019 (UTC) — username (talk)
Keep Agreed that Kajol Aikat is nominated for Padma Shri this year, ref: https://padmaawards.gov.in/CARD.ASPX?NOMINEEUID=E1142263ABF099489A2BF24C15B5656EB66E54C918EF367CD94F4DEACEBF274A&RAND=288121
Other references are also strong enough to provide credibility required. The page can be listed as of a lower importance on Wiki Biographies but is important enough to be here. Keep this page and withdraw the Afd.— Wikilog009 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- Note that every keep opinion - all 5 - are by an SPA.E.M.Gregory (talk) 00:39, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
- I have looked carefully at sources on page and searched diligently, and it is simply WP:TOOSOON for this young writer.E.M.Gregory (talk) 00:44, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
Keep The author is though young but not WP:TOOSOON The article was accepted on the main space years back and unnecessary editing happened in the course which is now corrected. Keep this article and mark it as a low priority biography. The author is nominated for Padma Shri so that is solely enough to establish his credibility at present. If not, then there are references from media houses like Hindustan Times and Telegraph which demonstrate the relevance and notability of this article to be an encyclopaedic acceptance. Also, irrespective of the nature of the account, the comments are valid. The lack of credibility that is repeatedly raised as an issue is not cited most of time. This article should stay. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikilog007 (talk • contribs) 02:40, 12 July 2019 (UTC)