Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Insyde: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Insyde: add a reflist-talk
delete
Line 22: Line 22:
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br />
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Timotheus Canens|T. Canens]] ([[User talk:Timotheus Canens|talk]]) 04:52, 22 July 2019 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Insyde]]</noinclude></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Timotheus Canens|T. Canens]] ([[User talk:Timotheus Canens|talk]]) 04:52, 22 July 2019 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Insyde]]</noinclude></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line -->
*'''Delete'''. The first keep !vote basically sums up this articles problems. The [[WP:GHITS]] claim is not true. IP found blogs, wikis. Not reliable sources. The site mentioning him is a PR listing. Claim about verified is not true, youtube did not evaluate "coverage". Musicbrainz is just a listing. Mentions are not indepth coverage. On the later claim of AWAL, they are distributors, not the releasing record co. Nothing good for GNG or MUSIC. [[User:Duffbeerforme|duffbeerforme]] ([[User talk:Duffbeerforme|talk]]) 03:49, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:49, 23 July 2019

Insyde (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Being streamed however many times does not qualify for the charting, certification, and airplay requirements at WP:NSINGER #2, 3, 11, 12. A WP:BEFORE search reveals no significant coverage in reliable sources to confirm any of the other criteria at WP:NSINGER. All that can be found are routine retail and streaming directories, plus an empty placeholder at AllMusic. Article is probably an attempted promotion and, charitably, it is too soon for this rapper to merit a Wikipedia article. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 18:37, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 18:37, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment -In the "Delete" vote above the editor claims that this artist does not meet the WP:NSINGER requirements, but he has released 2 albums on AWAL, fulfilling requirement #5.[1] [2] [3] [4] I also edited the article for the original author to remove any "self promotion" style writing and to make it have a more neutral tone.___GingeBro (talkcontribs)
  • Keep - when searching "Insyde Music" on Google: [1] EVERY result is referring to this Insyde. Also, I was able to find some blog coverage of his song. [2] and also another wiki entry: [3] and [4]. Also found a website mentioning him here: [5] His music is also released by the label (Shoelace Records) that released music for Otis Taylor (musician) Also his youtube channel is a Verified Artist Channel, which is only given to artists on large labels with contacts at YouTube, and it means that YouTube deemed there enough coverage and the chance of impersonation of this artist to give it the verified Artist mark. Also is mentioned in the independent music tracking website MusicBrainz (Often used by Wikipedia to gather data for songs and artists) [6]. Plenty of mentions and credibility found. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.156.30.174 (talkcontribs)

References

  1. ^ "Distro Deal". Insyde Blog. Retrieved 16 July 2019.
  2. ^ "Album Released!". Retrieved 16 July 2019.
  3. ^ "New Album out now! – Insyde". Retrieved 16 July 2019.
  4. ^ "Albums removed. – Insyde". Retrieved 16 July 2019.
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oklahoma-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 07:08, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - In the above "keep" vote, the other Wikis are copies of THIS version of Wikipedia and prove nothing but website mirroring. The Google search performed by that voter reveals a list of streaming, retail, and lyrics sites that you would get after searching for any musician. All other "sources" given in that vote merely indicate that the rapper exists, not that he has received reliable coverage. See the guidelines given in the original nomination, plus WP:EXIST and WP:ROUTINE. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|

Contribs) 17:17, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - He does have a point about the youtube artist channel though. Those are pretty exclusive.---GingeBro 15:11, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
Comment/Vote Change - I changed my stance to Keep from Weak Keep because the artist does pass notability standard for musicians as per WP:NSINGER. (Irrelevant bit of information: Also about a month ago I heard his song on a major Spotify editorial playlist. Another irrelevant note, the lyrics have been viewed a lot on Genius, which says something to me at least. He seems to have an engaged follower base, unlike the typical garage band wikipedia pages. That's my 2 cents.) --- GingeBro (talkcontribs) 03:06, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, T. Canens (talk) 04:52, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. The first keep !vote basically sums up this articles problems. The WP:GHITS claim is not true. IP found blogs, wikis. Not reliable sources. The site mentioning him is a PR listing. Claim about verified is not true, youtube did not evaluate "coverage". Musicbrainz is just a listing. Mentions are not indepth coverage. On the later claim of AWAL, they are distributors, not the releasing record co. Nothing good for GNG or MUSIC. duffbeerforme (talk) 03:49, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]