Talk:Earl of Strathmore and Kinghorne: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 09:55, 26 July 2019

"Normally, the highest subsidiary title (in this case Viscount Lyon) would be used, but the same is not done so as not to cause confusion with the Lord Lyon."

Do we have a source for this as opposed to an assumption. Many peers don't use their highest subsiduary title because they have an older or more prestigious lower title.Alci12 15:14, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Earl of Strathmore and Kinghorne. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160313221211/http://www.thecourier.co.uk/news/obituaries/18th-earl-of-strathmore-and-kinghorne-michael-fergus-bowes-lyon-1.926425 to http://www.thecourier.co.uk/news/obituaries/18th-earl-of-strathmore-and-kinghorne-michael-fergus-bowes-lyon-1.926425

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:44, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why the new creation?

Why the new creation? Were Scottish peers still blocked from the House of Lords then?--2001:A61:260D:6E01:5C1E:D3AC:7D41:61E0 (talk) 13:18, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not blocked but had to be elected Garlicplanting (talk) 09:55, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 13:18, 22 January 2018 edit 2001:a61:260d:6e01:5c1e:d3ac:7d41:61e0 (talk) →Why the new creation?: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 09:55, 26 July 2019 edit undo Garlicplanting (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 616 edits m →Why the new creation? Next edit →
Line 19:		Line 19:

	Why the new creation? Were Scottish peers still blocked from the House of Lords then?--[[Special:Contributions/2001:A61:260D:6E01:5C1E:D3AC:7D41:61E0\|2001:A61:260D:6E01:5C1E:D3AC:7D41:61E0]] ([[User talk:2001:A61:260D:6E01:5C1E:D3AC:7D41:61E0\|talk]]) 13:18, 22 January 2018 (UTC)		Why the new creation? Were Scottish peers still blocked from the House of Lords then?--[[Special:Contributions/2001:A61:260D:6E01:5C1E:D3AC:7D41:61E0\|2001:A61:260D:6E01:5C1E:D3AC:7D41:61E0]] ([[User talk:2001:A61:260D:6E01:5C1E:D3AC:7D41:61E0\|talk]]) 13:18, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
			: Not blocked but had to be elected [[User:Garlicplanting\|Garlicplanting]] ([[User talk:Garlicplanting\|talk]]) 09:55, 26 July 2019 (UTC)