Jump to content

Might Is Right: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Influence: Edits for clarity
Line 51: Line 51:
Though it is no longer included in current printings of ''The Satanic Bible'', early printings included an extensive dedication to various people whom LaVey recognized as influences, including Ragnar Redbeard.<ref>LaVey, Anton Szandor (1969). The Satanic Bible. New York: Avon Books. {{ISBN|978-0-380-01539-9}}.</ref>
Though it is no longer included in current printings of ''The Satanic Bible'', early printings included an extensive dedication to various people whom LaVey recognized as influences, including Ragnar Redbeard.<ref>LaVey, Anton Szandor (1969). The Satanic Bible. New York: Avon Books. {{ISBN|978-0-380-01539-9}}.</ref>


The suspected perpetrator of the [[Gilroy Garlic Festival shooting]] in [[Gilroy, California]], that killed two children and one young man and injured 12, was influenced by the book. Days before he was killed by police, Santino William Legan, on his [[Instagram]] account, mentioned ''Might is Right'' by name when making racist remarks about the festival congesting the countryside with "hordes" of [[Mestizos|mestizos]] and [[Silicon Valley]] [[White Americans|white]] "twats".<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.thedailybeast.com/gilroy-garlic-festival-shooting-suspect-santiago-legan-posted-about-far-right-book-moments-before-shooting|title=Gilroy Garlic Festival Shooting Suspect Santiago Posted Far-Right Book Moments Before Shooting|last1=Weill|first1=Kelly|last2=McNamara|first2=Andrew|access-date=July 29, 2019|date=July 29, 2019}}</ref>
A 19-year-old man who opened fire with a semi-automatic weapon at the [[Gilroy Garlic Festival shooting]] in [[Gilroy, California]], killing two children and one young man and injuring 12, was apparently influenced by the book. Days before the shooting rampage Santino William Legan, mentioned ''Might is Right'' by name in an Instagram post when making racist remarks about the festival congesting the countryside with "hordes" of [[Mestizos|mestizos]] and [[Silicon Valley]] [[White Americans|white]] "twats".<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.thedailybeast.com/gilroy-garlic-festival-shooting-suspect-santiago-legan-posted-about-far-right-book-moments-before-shooting|title=Gilroy Garlic Festival Shooting Suspect Santiago Posted Far-Right Book Moments Before Shooting|last1=Weill|first1=Kelly|last2=McNamara|first2=Andrew|access-date=July 29, 2019|date=July 29, 2019}}</ref>


==Editions==
==Editions==

Revision as of 23:46, 30 July 2019

Might Is Right
File:Might is right.jpg
2005 Dil Pickle Press cover
AuthorUnknown, see authorship
Ragnar Redbeard (pseudonym)
LanguageEnglish
SubjectSocial Darwinism
Publication date
1896
Publication placeUnited States
Media typePrint (hardback and paperback)
Pages96 (paperback)
ISBN9781682040232

Might Is Right or The Survival of the Fittest, is a book by pseudonymous author Ragnar Redbeard. First published in 1896[1], it heavily advocates egoist anarchism, amorality, consequentialism and psychological hedonism. In Might Is Right, Redbeard rejects conventional ideas such as advocacy of human and natural rights and he also argues that only strength or physical might can establish moral right (à la Callicles or Thrasymachus). The book also attacks Christianity and Democracy. Friedrich Nietzsche's theories of master–slave morality and herd mentality served as clear inspirations for Redbeard's book which was written contemporaneously.[2]

Noted individualist anarchist, revisionist historian James J. Martin called it "surely one of the most incendiary works ever to be published anywhere."[3] This refers to the book's controversial content such as its viewpoint that weakness should be regarded with hatred and the strong and forceful presence of Social Darwinism in its text. There are also controversial parts of the book which deal with the topics of race and male–female relations, such as its claim that the woman and the family as a whole are the property of the man and its proclamation that the Anglo-Saxon race is innately superior to all other races. [4] The book also contains many extremely anti-Semitic statements.[4]

Authorship

S. E. Parker writes in his introduction to the text: "The most likely candidate is a man named Arthur Desmond who was red-bearded, red-haired and whose poetry was very similar to that written by Redbeard."[4]

The Church of Satan founder Anton LaVey and white supremacist publisher Katja Lane (wife of The Order member David Lane) both believed noted novelist Jack London was substantially involved, if not the author of the entire book; the latter based her judgment on London's distinctive grammar and punctuation.[5][6] However, Jack London scholar Rodger Jacobs said, "the notion is as ludicrous as suggesting that the author of 'White Fang' was a cross-dressing hermaphrodite who buried his sexual shame in manly exploits".[5] London was born in 1876, so he would have to have written the book in his early teens in order for it to be first published in 1896.

The Monist journal states that "Ragnar Redbeard is a most ardent admirer of Nietzsche."[7]

The author sums up his work as follows:[7]

"This book is a reasoned negation of the Ten Commandments–the Golden Rule–the Sermon on the Mount–Republican Principles–Christian Principles–and "Principles" in general. It proclaims upon scientific evolutionary grounds, the unlimited absolutism of Might, and asserts that cut-and-dried moral codes are crude and immoral inventions, promotive of vice and vassalage."

Response

Leo Tolstoy, whom Might Is Right described as "the ablest modern expounder of primitive Christliness", responded in his 1897 essay What Is Art?:

The substance of this book, as it is expressed in the editor's preface, is that to measure "right" by the false philosophy of the Hebrew prophets and "weepful" Messiahs is madness. Right is not the offspring of doctrine, but of power. All laws, commandments, or doctrines as to not doing to another what you do not wish done to you, have no inherent authority whatever, but receive it only from the club, the gallows, and the sword. A man truly free is under no obligation to obey any injunction, human or divine. Obedience is the sign of the degenerate. Disobedience is the stamp of the hero.

Expressed in the form of a doctrine these positions startle us. In reality they are implied in the ideal of art serving beauty. The art of our upper classes has educated people in this ideal of the over-man, --- which is in reality the old ideal of Nero, Stenka Razin, Genghis Khan, Robert Macaire or Napoleon and all their accomplices, assistants, and adulators --- and it supports this ideal with all its might.

It is this supplanting of the ideal of what is right by the ideal of what is beautiful, i.e. of what is pleasant, that is the fourth consequence, and a terrible one, of the perversion of art in our society. It is fearful to think of what would befall humanity were such art to spread among the masses of the people. And it already begins to spread.[8]

S. E. Parker wrote: "Might Is Right is a work flawed by major contradictions." He particularly criticised the inconsistency of the book's central dogma of individualism with its open sexism and racism (both requiring a membership in a collective). However, he concluded that "it is sustained by a crude vigor that at its most coherent can help to clear away not a few of the religious, moral and political superstitions bequeathed to us by our ancestors."[4]

Author Chris Mathews suspects that the work is at least partly intended to be a satire of Social Darwinism and he also characterizes it as a "proto-fascist white power manifesto".[9]

Influence

Portions of Might Is Right comprise the vast majority of The Book of Satan in Anton LaVey's The Satanic Bible, the founding document of the Church of Satan.[10]

Though it is no longer included in current printings of The Satanic Bible, early printings included an extensive dedication to various people whom LaVey recognized as influences, including Ragnar Redbeard.[11]

A 19-year-old man who opened fire with a semi-automatic weapon at the Gilroy Garlic Festival shooting in Gilroy, California, killing two children and one young man and injuring 12, was apparently influenced by the book. Days before the shooting rampage Santino William Legan, mentioned Might is Right by name in an Instagram post when making racist remarks about the festival congesting the countryside with "hordes" of mestizos and Silicon Valley white "twats".[12]

Editions

Year Publisher Notes
1896 Auditorium Press[13][14]
1896 A. Uing Publisher
1903 A. Mueller Publishers
1910 W.J. Robbins Co. Ltd
1921 Ross’ Book Service
1927 Dil Pickle Press
1962 unknown publisher 18-page abridged edition
1969 same unknown publisher Expanded 32-page edition
1972 Revisionist Press Reprint of 1927 Dil Pickle edition. ISBN 978-1478225171
1984 Loompanics Unlimited ISBN 0-915179-12-1
1996 M. H. P & Co. Ltd. Centennial edition, with intro by Anton LaVey.
1999 14 Word Press St. Maries, Idaho
2003 Bugbee Books
2005 Revolva Russian edition with commentary. ISBN 5-94089-036-5 Parameter error in {{ISBN}}: checksum
2005 29 Books Reprint of 1927 Dil Pickle edition. ISBN 0-9748567-2-X
2005 Dil Pickle Press Edited and annotated by Darrell W. Conder. ISBN 0-9728233-0-1
2008 Zem Books ISBN 978-1-329-41381-8
2009 Edition Esoterick German hardcover edition. ISBN 978-3-936830-31-6
2012 Kustantamo Vuohi Julkaisut Finnish edition. ISBN 978-952-92-9531-9
2014 Camion Noir French edition. ISBN 978-235779-620-1
2014 Aristeus Books, ed. Dragan Nikolic Second ed., Eng. edn. ISBN 978-1682040232
2018 Zem Books Hardcover ed. ISBN 978-1-387-51811-1
2018 Noir Anthologie Spanish edition ASIN B07DH2QWS8
2019 Underworld Amusements The Authoritative Edition. ISBN 978-1943687039

References

  1. ^ Gilmore, Peter H.; Introduction, Might is Right: The Authoritative Edition, Underworld Amusements, April 23 2019, 406 pages. ISBN-13: 9781943687039.
  2. ^ Chris Mathews (2009). Modern Satanism: Anatomy of a Radical Subculture. Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 64. ISBN 978-0-313-36639-0. Retrieved May 16, 2017.
  3. ^ EGO No 6 1985 Twenty Five Pence, at the Wayback Machine (archived August 18, 2010) archived from the original
  4. ^ a b c d S. E. Parker, Introduction to Might is Right
  5. ^ a b RUNNING WITH THE WOLVES: JACK LONDON, THE CULT OF MASCULINITY, AND "MIGHT IS RIGHT", Rodger Jacobs, Jack London Online Collection, Sonoma U
  6. ^ "Foreward" (sic) by Anton LaVey, to Might is Right, pub. Shane Bugbee (2003)
  7. ^ a b Immorality as a Philosophic Principle - Nietzesche's Emotionalism. The Monist, Volume 9. 1899. p. 608.
  8. ^ What is art? Leo Tolstoy
  9. ^ Mathews 2009, p. 65
  10. ^ Gallagher, Eugene V. (2013). "Sources, Sects, and Scripture: The Book of Satan in The Satanic Bible". In Per Faxneld and Jesper Aa. Petersen (ed.). The Devil's Party-Satanism in Modernity. Oxford University Press. pp. 103–122.
  11. ^ LaVey, Anton Szandor (1969). The Satanic Bible. New York: Avon Books. ISBN 978-0-380-01539-9.
  12. ^ Weill, Kelly; McNamara, Andrew (July 29, 2019). "Gilroy Garlic Festival Shooting Suspect Santiago Posted Far-Right Book Moments Before Shooting". Retrieved July 29, 2019.
  13. ^ Might Is Right (The Logic of To-day) / by Ragnar Redbeard. National Library of Australia. 1896. Retrieved August 10, 2012. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)
  14. ^ Gilmore, Peter H.; Introduction, Might is Right: The Authoritative Edition, Underworld Amusements, April 23 2019, 406 pages. ISBN-13: 9781943687039.