Hemileccinum impolitum: Difference between revisions
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
The iodine bolete was first described by [[Elias Magnus Fries]], an eminent mycologist of the 19th century, who placed the fungus in genus ''[[Boletus]]''.<ref>Fries, E. (1838). Epicrisis Systematis Mycologici. :1-610</ref> The [[Latin]] epithet ''impolitum'' (meaning "rough"), likely refers to the [[Pileus (mycology)|cap]] of the species which is initially felty, covered in a finely filamentous coating. The species' taxonomic position had long remained uncertain and various authors had placed it in different genera in the past, including the now abandoned genera ''Tubiporus''<ref>Karsten PA. (1882). Rysslands, Finlans och den Skandinaviska halföns Hattsvampar. Sednare Delen: Pip-, Tagg-, Hud-, Klubb- och Gelésvampar. Bidrag till Kännedom av Finlands Natur och Folk. 37: 1–257</ref> and ''Versipellis''.<ref>Quélet L. (1886). Enchir. fung. (Paris): 158</ref> |
The iodine bolete was first described by [[Elias Magnus Fries]], an eminent mycologist of the 19th century, who placed the fungus in genus ''[[Boletus]]''.<ref>Fries, E. (1838). Epicrisis Systematis Mycologici. :1-610</ref> The [[Latin]] epithet ''impolitum'' (meaning "rough"), likely refers to the [[Pileus (mycology)|cap]] of the species which is initially felty, covered in a finely filamentous coating. The species' taxonomic position had long remained uncertain and various authors had placed it in different genera in the past, including the now abandoned genera ''Tubiporus''<ref>Karsten PA. (1882). Rysslands, Finlans och den Skandinaviska halföns Hattsvampar. Sednare Delen: Pip-, Tagg-, Hud-, Klubb- och Gelésvampar. Bidrag till Kännedom av Finlands Natur och Folk. 37: 1–257</ref> and ''Versipellis''.<ref>Quélet L. (1886). Enchir. fung. (Paris): 158</ref> |
||
Based on preliminary analysis of the [[28S ribosomal RNA]] locus, mycologists Manfred Binder and Halmut Besl placed the species in ''[[Xerocomus]]'' in 2000.<ref name="BINDER & BESL 2000"/> However, in 2008 Josef Šutara transferred the fungus to the new genus ''[[Hemileccinum]]'', based on its distinctive morphology.<ref name="Šutara 2008"/> More elaborate [[phylogenetic]] studies by Wu and colleagues in 2014, confirmed that the iodine bolete does not belong in ''[[Boletus]]'', ''[[Xerocomus]]'' or ''[[Leccinum]]'', since collections identified as ''H. impolitum'' occupied a distinct phylogenetic [[Lineage (evolution)|lineage]] within the subfamily of Xerocomoideae, closely related to ''[[Corneroboletus]]''.<ref name="Wu 2014"/> Subsequent contributions by Halling and colleagues<ref name="Halling 2015"/> and Loizides and colleagues<ref name="Loizides 2019"/> have since confirmed the [[monophyly]] of the genus, which presently includes just two [[European]] species: ''H. impolitum'' and ''[[H. depilatum]]''. |
Based on preliminary analysis of the [[28S ribosomal RNA]] locus, mycologists Manfred Binder and Halmut Besl placed the species in ''[[Xerocomus]]'' in 2000.<ref name="BINDER & BESL 2000"/> However, in 2008 Josef Šutara transferred the fungus to the new genus ''[[Hemileccinum]]'', based on its distinctive morphology.<ref name="Šutara 2008"/> More elaborate [[phylogenetic]] studies by Wu and colleagues in 2014, confirmed that the iodine bolete does not belong in ''[[Boletus]]'', ''[[Xerocomus]]'' or ''[[Leccinum]]'', since collections identified as ''H. impolitum'' occupied a distinct phylogenetic [[Lineage (evolution)|lineage]] within the subfamily of Xerocomoideae, closely related to ''[[Corneroboletus]]''.<ref name="Wu 2014"/> Subsequent contributions by Halling and colleagues,<ref name="Halling 2015"/> and Loizides and colleagues,<ref name="Loizides 2019"/> have since confirmed the [[monophyly]] of the genus, which presently includes just two [[European]] species: ''H. impolitum'' and ''[[H. depilatum]]''. |
||
==Description== |
==Description== |
||
Revision as of 06:52, 6 August 2019
| Hemileccinum impolitum | |
|---|---|
| |
| Scientific classification | |
| Kingdom: | |
| Division: | |
| Class: | |
| Order: | |
| Family: | |
| Genus: | |
| Species: | H. impolitum
|
| Binomial name | |
| Hemileccinum impolitum (Fr.) Šutara (2008)
| |
| Synonyms[1] | |
Hemileccinum impolitum | |
|---|---|
 | Pores on hymenium |
 | Cap is convex or flat |
 | Stipe is bare |
 | Spore print is olive-brown |
 | Ecology is mycorrhizal |
 | Edibility is edible |
Hemileccinum impolitum is a basidiomycete fungus of the Boletaceae family, native to Europe. It is commonly referred to as the iodine bolete, because its fruit bodies tend to emit an iodine odour when cut, more detectable in the stem base. Like other members of the family, H. impolitum has tubes and pores instead of gills in the hymenial surface of its fruit bodies. It is widely distributed in temperate and southern Europe, where it grows in mycorrhizal symbiosis with broad-leaved trees, particularly oak (Quercus).
Taxonomy and phylogeny
The iodine bolete was first described by Elias Magnus Fries, an eminent mycologist of the 19th century, who placed the fungus in genus Boletus.[2] The Latin epithet impolitum (meaning "rough"), likely refers to the cap of the species which is initially felty, covered in a finely filamentous coating. The species' taxonomic position had long remained uncertain and various authors had placed it in different genera in the past, including the now abandoned genera Tubiporus[3] and Versipellis.[4]
Based on preliminary analysis of the 28S ribosomal RNA locus, mycologists Manfred Binder and Halmut Besl placed the species in Xerocomus in 2000.[5] However, in 2008 Josef Šutara transferred the fungus to the new genus Hemileccinum, based on its distinctive morphology.[1] More elaborate phylogenetic studies by Wu and colleagues in 2014, confirmed that the iodine bolete does not belong in Boletus, Xerocomus or Leccinum, since collections identified as H. impolitum occupied a distinct phylogenetic lineage within the subfamily of Xerocomoideae, closely related to Corneroboletus.[6] Subsequent contributions by Halling and colleagues,[7] and Loizides and colleagues,[8] have since confirmed the monophyly of the genus, which presently includes just two European species: H. impolitum and H. depilatum.
Description
The cap diameter usually ranges between 5 and 12 cm (2 and 4.5 in), but can reach 20 cm (8 in). It is at first hemispherical, gradually becoming convex as the fungus expands and finally flat in fully mature specimens, sometimes with a slightly uplifted margin. The colour ranges from light tan, pale brown, chestnut-brown, grey, ochraceous-brown, greyish-brown or olivaceous-brown and the cap of young fruit bodies is initially covered in a velvety, finely filamentous silvery-grey coating that disappears in age.[9][10] The cap cuticle turns violet with NH3 (ammonia).[1]
The stem is cylindrical, clavate or ventricose, 5 to 15 cm (2 to 6 in) high by 1 to 5 cm (0.5 to 2 in) wide, cream to pale yellow, but typically lemon-yellow at the apex and usually narrowing at the base. It has no reticulation (net), but is covered in tiny pustules (scabrosities) below the apex, sometimes browning with age.
The tubes are pale yellow to lemon-yellow and usually do not discolour when cut, but may rarely stain faintly greenish-brown. The pores are small and rounded, lemon-yellow to yellow, not discolouring or rarely staining greenish-brown where handled or injured. The flesh is thick, soft, pale yellow to whitish, usually remaining the same colour when cut, or rarely becoming faintly pinkish-brown above the tubes and at the stem base. It has a sour smell somewhat reminiscent of iodine, more pronounced at the stem base. The spore print is olivaceous-brown.[11][12][13]
The spores are fusiform (spindle-shaped) or fusiform-ellipsoid, measuring 10–16 × 4–6 μm.[14] Although under an optical microscope they appear perfectly smooth, when viewed with a scanning electron microscope (SEM) fine warts and tiny “pin-pricks” are visible on their surface.[6] The cap cuticle is a trichodermium, composed of cylindrical smooth hyphae with clavate terminal cells that later collapse in mature specimens.[1]
Similar species
- Hemileccinum depilatum is the sister-species of H. impolitum and morphologically very similar, differing by its wrinkled or "hammered" cap surface, and its association hornbeam (Carpinus) and hop-hornbeam (Ostrya). Microscopically it is distinguished by the structure of its cap cuticle, which is a palisadoderm composed of spherical and shortly cylindrical cells.
- Leccinellum lepidum can look very similar, but typically has a viscid cap with a wrinkled or "hammered" surface, not turning violet in NH3, while its flesh slowly turns violaceous-grey when exposed to the air. Microscopically it has longer spores, often reaching 20 μm in length.
- Xerocomus subtomentosus lacks scabrosities on the stem surface, while its pores are angular and stain bluish when bruised.
Distribution and habitat
Hemileccinum implitum is ecologically versatile, forming ectomycorrhizal associations with several species of oak (Quercus), but occasionally also with beech (Fagus) and chestnut (Castanea). It does not appear to be substrate-specific and has been reported from both calcareous and acidic soil.[13][10][8] In the United Kingdom, it is occasionally found in southern England, although finds in other parts of the country have also been reported.[15]
So far, it has been molecularly verified to be present in Estonia, France, Germany, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, and the Mediterranean islands of Cyprus and Sardinia.[7][8]
Edibility
The iodine bolete is considered a good edible species by some authors[10] and inedible by others,[14] probably because of its peculiar odour. However, it is hardly ever found in large numbers, therefore care and discretion should be exercised when harvesting this mushroom.
References
- ^ a b c d Šutara J. (2008). "Xerocomus s. l. in the light of the present state of knowledge" (PDF). Czech Mycology. 60 (1): 29–62.
- ^ Fries, E. (1838). Epicrisis Systematis Mycologici. :1-610
- ^ Karsten PA. (1882). Rysslands, Finlans och den Skandinaviska halföns Hattsvampar. Sednare Delen: Pip-, Tagg-, Hud-, Klubb- och Gelésvampar. Bidrag till Kännedom av Finlands Natur och Folk. 37: 1–257
- ^ Quélet L. (1886). Enchir. fung. (Paris): 158
- ^ Binder M, Besl H (2000). 28S rDNA sequence data and chemo-taxonomical analyses on the ge- neric concept of Leccinum (Boletales) (in German). Trento: Verlag Micologia 2000.
- ^ a b Wu G, Feng B, Xu J, Zhu XT, Li YC, Zeng NK, Hosen MI, Yang ZL. "Molecular phylogenetic analyses redefine seven major clades and reveal 22 new generic clades in the fungal family Boletaceae". Fungal Diversity. 69 (1): 93–115. doi:10.1007/s13225-014-0283-8.
- ^ a b Halling, Roy E.; Fechner, Nigel; Nuhn, Mitchell; Osmundson, Todd; Soytong, Kasem; Arora, David; Binder, Manfred; Hibbett, David (2015). "Evolutionary relationships of Heimioporus and Boletellus (Boletales), with an emphasis on Australian taxa including new species and new combinations in Aureoboletus, Hemileccinum and Xerocomus". Australian Systematic Botany. 28 (1): 1–22. doi:10.1071/SB14049.
- ^ a b c Loizides M, Bellanger JM, Assyov B, Moreau PA, Richard F (2019). "Present status and future of boletoid fungi (Boletaceae) on the island of Cyprus: cryptic and threatened diversity unraveled by 10-year study". Fungal Ecology. 41 (13): 65–81.
- ^ Courtecuisse R, Duhem B (1995). Mushrooms & Toadstools of Britain & Europe. London, UK: Harper-Collins.
- ^ a b c Galli R. (2007). I Boleti. Atlante pratico-monographico per la determinazione dei boleti (in Italian) (3rd ed.). Milano, Italy: Dalla Natura.
- ^ Helmut and Renate Grunert (1992). Field Guide to MUSHROOMS of Britain and Europe (English Edition). The Crowood Press Ltd. ISBN 1-85223-592-6.
- ^ Roger Phillips (2006). Mushrooms. Pan MacMillan. ISBN 0-330-44237-6.
- ^ a b Ladurner H, Simonini G (2003). Xerocomus s.l. Fungi Europaei. Vol. 8. Alassio: Edizioni Candusso. ISBN 978-88-901057-2-2.
- ^ a b Breitenbach J, Kränzlin F (1991). Pilze der Schweiz 3(1). Röhrlinge und Blätterpilze (in German). Luzern, Switzerland: Verlag Mykologia. ISBN 978-3-85604-030-7.
- ^ Watling R, Hills AE (2005). "Boletes and their allies (revised and enlarged edition)". In Henderson DM, Orton PD, Watling R (eds.). British Fungus Flora. Agarics and boleti. Vol. 1. Edinburgh, Scotland: Royal Botanic Garden.