Jump to content

Wikipedia:AMA Requests for Assistance/Requests/November 2006/Mattisse: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Mattisse (talk | contribs)
filing
 
opening case...
Line 102: Line 102:
-->
-->


'''Case Status:''' {{AMA case status|new}}
'''Case Status:''' {{AMA case status|open}}


'''Advocate Status:'''
'''Advocate Status:'''
*Accept, [[User:Addhoc|Addhoc]] 11:31, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
*None assigned.

Revision as of 11:31, 30 November 2006

Wikipedian filing request:

Other Wikipedians this pertains to:

Wikipedia pages this pertains to:


Questions:

Have you read the AMA FAQ?

  • Answer:yes

How would you describe the nature of this dispute? (policy violation, content dispute, personal attack, other)

  • Answer: They seem to be out to get me personally. They accused User:Timmy12 of being me and drove him off. They accuse me of being anti-pagan.

What methods of Dispute Resolution have you tried so far? If you can, please provide wikilinks so that the Advocate looking over this case can see what you have done.

  • Answer:They have filed numberous reports against me, several Checkusers, a recent RFC I have defended myself some of the time. I filed some complaints and asked questions at the Technical Pump. Now the Cabal Mediation who was taken off the case is trying to block me. He was on the list above but I removed it as the first time I tried to file I was sent to his page.

October 18, 2006

October 27, 2006


What do you expect to get from Advocacy?

  • Answer:Some tips to avoid these situations besides being afraid to do anything. Maybe some understanding of what is going on and a sense whether there is any hope.

Summary:

A group of people are protexting a specific group of articles. I blundered accidently into some of them when I was wikifying backlogs and tagged one for ADF. That is how it began. A group of people are protextion specific articles that spam Wikipedia. Specifically:

But if you look at my thousands of edits you will see that I edit a wide range. This group, and the people they have instigated are the only people, aside from a couple of cases, that has ever had a problem with my editing.

Discussion:

Followup:

When the case is finished, please take a minute to fill out the following survey:

Did you find the Advocacy process useful?

  • Answer:

Did your Advocate handle your case in an appropriate manner?

  • Answer:

On a scale of 1 (worst) to 5 (best), how polite was your Advocate?

  • Answer:

On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel your Advocate was in solving the problem?

  • Answer:

On a scale of 1 to 5, how effective do you feel the Advocacy process is altogether?

  • Answer:

If there were one thing that you would like to see different in the Advocacy process, what would it be?

  • Answer:

If you were to deal with this dispute again, what would you do differently, if anything?

  • Answer:


AMA Information

Case Status: Template:AMA case status

Advocate Status: