Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 August 23: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
AnomieBOT (talk | contribs)
(BOT) Close discussions for deleted/nonexistent templates: "Template:2013–14 La Liga table". Errors? User:AnomieBOT/shutoff/TFDClerk
Line 13: Line 13:


-->
-->

==== [[Template:DecadeCategoryNav]] ====
==== [[Template:DecadeCategoryNav]] ====
* {{Tfd links|DecadeCategoryNav|module=|type=merge}}
* {{Tfd links|DecadeCategoryNav|module=|type=merge}}
Line 54: Line 55:


==== [[Template:2013–14 La Liga table]] ====
==== [[Template:2013–14 La Liga table]] ====
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).''

The result of the discussion was '''Delete'''; deleted by {{admin|Fastily}} [[User:AnomieBOT|AnomieBOT]][[User talk:AnomieBOT|<span style="color:#880">⚡</span>]] 02:02, 31 August 2019 (UTC)<!-- Tfd top -->
* {{Tfd links|2013–14 La Liga table}}
* {{Tfd links|2013–14 La Liga table}}
* {{Tfd links|2014–15 La Liga table}}
* {{Tfd links|2014–15 La Liga table}}
Line 77: Line 82:
:<small>Note: This discussion has been included in [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Football#Nominations for deletion and page moves|WikiProject Football]]'s list of association football-related deletions. [[User:GiantSnowman|Giant]][[User talk:GiantSnowman|Snowman]] 18:43, 26 August 2019 (UTC)</small>
:<small>Note: This discussion has been included in [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Football#Nominations for deletion and page moves|WikiProject Football]]'s list of association football-related deletions. [[User:GiantSnowman|Giant]][[User talk:GiantSnowman|Snowman]] 18:43, 26 August 2019 (UTC)</small>
*'''Delete''' per nom. [[User:GiantSnowman|Giant]][[User talk:GiantSnowman|Snowman]] 18:45, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' per nom. [[User:GiantSnowman|Giant]][[User talk:GiantSnowman|Snowman]] 18:45, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's [[Help:Using talk pages|talk page]] or in a [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]]).''</div>


==== [[Template:Canada portals by province and territory]] ====
==== [[Template:Canada portals by province and territory]] ====

Revision as of 02:02, 31 August 2019

August 23

Propose merging Template:DecadeCategoryNav with Template:Navseasoncats.
Template:Navseasoncats does a better job, more simply:

  1. Navseasoncats needs no parameters
  2. Navseasoncats displays 11 decades in the series, whereas Template:DecadeCategoryNav displays only 7.
  3. DecadeCategoryNav clutters its navbox with an extra row of extraneous links, to the raw decade. A navbox is a signpost, and clutter impedes navigation.

Navseasoncats has grown to become overwhelmingly the most-used navigation tool for years, decades, seasons, etc. Standardising on Navseasoncats where possible provides readers with consistency of navigation, which is an important goal of any computer interface. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:04, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I would definitely support a merge of {{DBDecadesInCentury}}. I haven't checked {{DBCenturiesIn2ndMillennium}} properly, but at first glance it looks mergeworthy. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:57, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I guess not. I've done it now adding a note about the other nomination. --Trialpears (talk) 16:46, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:21, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Editor doesn't know what he's doing. David Biddulph (talk) 18:49, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The table is now in the article. HawkAussie (talk) 02:57, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Primefac (talk) 16:41, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 02:02, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused after being merged with the parent article (with attribution) per consensus at WT:FOOTY and here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, ... Frietjes (talk) 14:02, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 18:43, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) --Trialpears (talk) 13:23, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

These templates used to include links to about a dozen portals each. Recently the vast majority of those portals have been deleted leaving these templates pretty barren and not very useful. Currently unused. BLAIXX 12:03, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) --Trialpears (talk) 13:22, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 11:29, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete per nominator — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:25, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Any of the films he has directed, don't have a Wikipedia page. ___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 10:44, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).