User talk:AngusWOOF

Archives (Index)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Draft:Ritesh Agarwal

AngusWOOF A new page was created by COI editor User:Deenos3, who has declared COI on his user page. The new content seems to pass WP:GNG and has WP:RS. I have manually moved content from Ritesh Agarwal (entrepreneur) to Ritesh Agarwal. I am not 100% sure it was done correct and there is also a draft page Draft:Ritesh Agarwal for it. Can you please look into this? Meeanaya (talk) 08:02, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

Meeanaya, normally we would use AFCH to process drafts, but since the editor, who may or may not be different from the draft editor, has directly created the page and you moved it from mainspace to mainspace. I would leave the COI tag on unless another editor has neutralized it for self-promotional tone. Also see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ritesh Agarwal and remove any claims of notability / awards mentioned there. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:44, 29 July 2019 (UTC)

AngusWOOF, it seems that someone has pulled Ritesh Agarwal page down again based on 2016 AFD. It seems that they have not reviewed the sources which were indepth. The current page has in-depth sources and sufficient RS to qualify for a Wiki page. Can you please look into this? Even, I was not the page creator however someone has added it on my talk page. I don't have enough experience or really not sure what can be done, but yes I truly believe, he is one of the most notable entrepreneur in the country. Meeanaya (talk) 04:46, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Meeanaya, I would merge it into the Oyo Rooms article. A lot of Agarwal's life can go into that since that's his main business. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 05:44, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

AngusWOOF, I have just filed an undeletion request here. Meeanaya (talk) 05:48, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Meeanaya, it's now being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ritesh Agarwal (2nd nomination) AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:36, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

AngusWOOF, I have added my detailed review and why he is notable and deserves a page at AFD. I won't be voting anywhere with a default mindset but yes after a detailed review. Meeanaya (talk) 04:24, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

Meeanaya, it's in mainspace now, so you can trim his sources to just the quality external secondary sources now. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 14:59, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Please re-review my draft

Hey AngusWOOF, I have edited this article/draft to the best of my ability to make it neutral and to provide reliable resources. If there is anything you can edit to improve the article please go ahead. Or if you have any suggestions please let me know. Thank you.

Please see the comments on Draft:Muhammad Qasim ibn Abdul Karim. I need all the non-English references to be clarified as shown in the first reference. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:31, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Full Intention discography

Hi AngusWOOF,

I didn't find a reliable source other than discogs for their 2006 album (connected 10 years). So I think that we can remove it and it will be OK. Don't you think so ?

And yes, Hustlers Convention is an alias for the same music duo. We could combine the two articles.

Regards,

Saunderson Anreef (talk) 18:52, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

Saunderson Anreef, I would leave out any albums that aren't covered by reliable sources and only keep ones where it's discussed. If there's some biography detail saying this is Hustlers Convention's second studio album, then it's okay to list those. I also agree with combining Hustlers Convention to the Full Intention article and to include a section on Hustlers Convention there. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:27, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Saunderson Anreef, I have redirect Hustlers Convention to the Full Intention article. Please help develop the bio there so it discusses both. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:50, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Planète Rap

I created this page with English translation. I added websites from the French Wikipedia page.

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plan%C3%A8te_Rap

Why you declined it ?

196.114.110.76, same issue as Planete Juniors. You need external news sources evidence that the channel should have a separate article from the network article. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:28, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

https://skyrock.fm/news/l-interview-planete-rap-de-damso/5320

This site is an interview of Damso at Planète Rap. Can be insert it on the draft ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.122.27.71 (talk) 16:32, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

196.122.27.71, you can add interviews, but it really needs more secondary news sources (non-interviews) to show notability. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:37, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

https://www.raprnb.com/tag/planete-rap/

This website mentionnate all news and interviews to show is a notable article. It can be added on the draft ?

(the website is in French language) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 45.218.255.139 (talk) 11:16, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

45.218.255.139, it is not clear that Raprnb is a reliable news source. Can you find more external news sources? AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:05, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

No, I found all websites about this radio programm. Can you sumbit it ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 45.218.139.138 (talk) 14:58, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Alameda Council

Thanks for looking at the draft. I'm perplexed. The article has existed for six years. Someone moved it from the article space and too the draft space. It may be a short article, but it has enough citations to be notable. It is a 100 year old non-profit. In any case, I simply would like to see it moved back to article status. Thanks. --evrik ^(talk) 22:38, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

You can talk to QueerEcofeminist about it? AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:43, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

I'm attempting a CSD of the redirect and if it goes through then I can move it back. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:05, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

evrik, it's been moved back to mainspace. Thanks again for fixing it up. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:49, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

pursuing afd

Hi Angus, can you help me pursue AFD on this article The Rules of Survival, thank you so much! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 126.69.245.1 (talk) 09:26, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

126.69.245.1, I don't think there's enough to AFD this. See the talk page for that article. I just added a bunch of references that could be included. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 14:37, 13 August 2019 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Youpik added various sources of citations to back-up the trend of social e-commerce which is trending now

please review youpik again.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Youpik

i have furnished more information

please review youpik again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Benawitan (talk • contribs) 11:24, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Benawitan, it still reads like an advertisement for the company. Please rewrite and provide other sources besides the website. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 14:41, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

updated again https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Youpik — Preceding unsigned comment added by Benawitan (talk • contribs) 05:38, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Benawitan, this was deleted for being too promotional / advertising. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:36, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

National Democratic Training Committee

Hey AngusWoof! I've made some edits to my draft since the last time you looked at it. Do you mind taking another look and seeing what else we can do to put it in a place to be approved? --Jacobvurpillat (talk) 22:47, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Jacobvurpillat, I'm still not seeing a balanced tone on the reception. So it was criticized, but by whom, when, and how? AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:05, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Jacobvurpillat, I've gone ahead and accepted the article, but am leaving the COI tag on there until another editor can scrub it for neutrality. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:48, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Discretionary Sanctions Alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in pseudoscience and fringe science. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33 --Guy Macon (talk) 01:03, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

(Zero issues with your edits. I am just hitting everyone on the Jenny McCarthy page that hasn't received a pseudoscience and fringe science discretionary sanctions alert in the last year) --Guy Macon (talk) 01:03, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

Guy Macon, can you add an editnotice on the talk page for Jenny McCarthy? There's nothing on that page that suggests that it is under DS. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 13:46, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

Done. Good suggestion. --Guy Macon (talk) 18:12, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

Unacademy company promotion article

Hello AngusWOOF, As my article "fabgrades" was removed on july 30, I have something to say about it. Firstly , I had no intention of misusing wikipedia through promoting my company through wikipedia. I had created the page on wikipedia because I found a page of similar company on wikipedia. here is the link :https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unacademy , This company offers paid courses and charges its users . You can see the warning notices on the wikipedia article of unacademy . as the content is promotional . I donot charge for any service . Whwn my page is considered promotional(although all of my content is free and educational) then please have a look at other companies like unacademy who are promotng thier business through wikipedia even after wikipedia has issued notices to them. Copy of notices to unacademy: This article contains content that is written like an advertisement. Please help improve it by removing promotional content and inappropriate external links, and by adding encyclopedic content written from a neutral point of view. (March 2018) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) Dollar sign in circle cleaned (PD version).svg This article may have been created or edited in return for undisclosed payments, a violation of Wikipedia's terms of use. It may require cleanup to comply with Wikipedia's content policies. (March 2018) Details of removal of my page. Your submission at Articles for creation: FabGrades (July 30) AFC-Logo Decline.svgYour recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were: This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Wikipedia is not a web host for your company. It does not need detailed syllabus of your course offerings. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:FabGrades and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:FabGrades, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit. If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted. If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:16, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by OpenSourceLearningIndia (talk • contribs) 10:36, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

Are you questioning whether Unacademy is notable? You could tag that for notability or raise an AFD on it. The article has the COI paid tag on it and can't be removed until the article is neutralized by someone unconnected to the subject. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:10, 18 August 2019 (UTC)

@OpenSourceLearningIndia: I would not have seen this discussion if your inclusion of a bare db-g7 template in a copy of AngusWOOF's message to you had not put this whole user talk page into Category:Candidates for speedy deletion by user yesterday. Now that I've seen your article about your company, which was deservedly deleted per {{db-g11}} as a blatant advertisement of your company's services, and compared that to the Unacademy article, there is, as the saying goes, no comparison. The Unacademy page is nearly encyclopedic, meaning suitable for an encyclopedia, with several citations of reliable sources. It is not a business listing by any stretch of the imagination. – Athaenara ✉ 00:41, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Article Name for S7000A

@AngusWOOF Thanks for the name change, but should it go back to "S7000A (tax law)"?

The reason I added the part about New York State is that many people do not know the bill names.

But it is in the New York State taxation category, so maybe that will help.

Ryozzo (talk) 17:22, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Ryozzo, until there's another S7000A somewhere, I believe it should be primary topic. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:26, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Barnstar

can i add this image to your user page

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Nathanael raymaine gentles (talk • contribs)

References

Why was my article declined?

Hi.

A few months ago you rejected an article that I submitted, called “List of largest Cities in the UK”. At the time I was told that my article was too similar to other articles so it was not worth publishing.

However, a few weeks ago, another article, “List of cities and towns in the United Kingdom by population“, which had almost the exact same, or very similar at the least, was accepted and submitted. I was very annoyed when I found that article, and I want to know why mine was declined but that article was accepted.

I don’t know who accepted the article, so I am not blaming anyone in particular, but I would wish to know why my article was rejected but a similar one accepted, especially as I spent ages on the article.

I would appreciate it if you found out why and responded.

TheKnowledgeMaster1738 (talk) 17:16, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

TheKnowledgeMaster1738, I will try a CSD first and then a histmerge with your draft if it is retained. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:56, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

TheKnowledgeMaster1738, that article had bypassed the AFC process and was placed directly in the mainspace. I had it removed by CSD and per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of cities and towns in the United Kingdom by population. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 13:50, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Commonspoly citation update

Hi @AngusWOOF,

My article was declined for insufficient citations. I have added a few more third party citations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123survesh (talk • contribs) 09:33, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

I was searching online for reliable sources, I could only find blogs, mostly of people inviting other people to play the actual game and talking about it. I couldn't find any news paper level publishing. Do see if the ones that I found hold good, I think they are from reputable resources. The alternative UK The P2P Foundation's blog A blog by Waag.org

I thought that a commons game like this should have its own page on wikipedia. I do understand that wikipedia is a public knowledge portal and doesn't work based on individual likes and dislikes. So if the above citations are not good enough I understand the situation and I will just add it as an alternative to monopoly as suggested. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123survesh (talk • contribs) 09:30, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

123survesh, see Wikipedia:Reliable sources and WP:RSP on what sources are good. Blogs are usually not reliable, especially forum posts, but sometimes the authors of the blogs are reliable / notable, and sometimes it's one by the primary source. The variants page would be a good place for the game. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 13:48, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

Lightricks

Wondering if you would be able to review this page. You actually made an edit to it after it was submitted for review. It was submitted 2 weeks ago and is still waiting. If not, fair enough. I understand. Thanks. MaskedSinger (talk) 14:46, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Not sure if you saw this. Know there are over 4,500 pages awaiting review but this was has received work from a senior editor so is now in a much better position to be reviewed. Frustrating as it was rejected extremely quickly but now that it's good to go, it's just sitting there. MaskedSinger (talk) 18:34, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

MaskedSinger, you could ask that editor if they are willing to approve their own AFC. Otherwise any AFC review can take a look. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:32, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

AngusWOOF, don't think he wants to. What about you? MaskedSinger (talk) 19:10, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

"VS Joy" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect VS Joy. Since you had some involvement with the VS Joy redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:48, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Lucille Lortel Award for Outstanding Projection Design

• 148.75.165.78 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Lucille Lortel Award for Outstanding Projection Design (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi AngusWOOF

This is the second time and second editor to decline this article. While I agree that the subject may not in and of itself be worthy of its own article when viewed in a vacuum, if one looks at the larger context of how entertainment industry award wikipedia pages are structured, I believe it makes sense.

In most of the various award pages one can't find sources specifically for individual award categories. If there were, I would have included them. Having said that, Lucille Lortel Award for Outstanding Lead Actress in a Play is of similar import and yet has its own page. The Lucille Lortel Awards award have been around for 33 years and currently has 20 categories. Clearly when all these categories are fleshed out, the main page would become unwieldy.

Including everything in the main award page is not scalable and does not in fact seem to be standard operating procedure for wikipedia awards entries

Check out the Drama Desk Award for Outstanding Lyrics, the Academy Award for Best Sound Mixing or the Tony Award for Best Choreography. They too are without sources specific to the exact topic and yeah all of these awards have individual pages for each award category.

If you still disagree, is there a path for review by a larger group of editors?

Thanks for your consideration.

148.75.165.78 (talk) 04:37, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

148.75.165.78, as discussed on your talk page, the award isn't independently notable from the collection of awards. Please provide sources otherwise. You can also discuss whether they should be split at the awards talk page. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:08, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

DJ Maxwell D Draft article -

Hi Angus,

would appreciate some guidance here as you have declined the article. I have spent some considerable time getting collecting the other reference points for this internationally famous Rap/Grime artist who has not only charted but collaberated with Ruwanga on a regular basis on hollywood and net flix movie sound tracks. he is also acknowlaged as one of the founders of the UK Grime scene and is discussed in 3 respected books on the subject. all of which i have referenced.

I am at a loss to understand what else is neaded as there are many less notible entries on the wiki - appreciate your advice and help.

many thanks Nick — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nplpod (talk • contribs) 17:01, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Nick, can you list WP:THREE sources to show that the artist meets WP:MUSICBIO? Having stream counts on Spotify does not establish any notability. Same with goodreads. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:08, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Naijapals

Hello, I noticed you haven't approved the articles I started on Naijapals due to insufficient references, which is understandable. However, I need to point out that collation of references for Nigerian music sites is very tedious and difficult due to the manner which these kind of activities are covered in Nigeria. This perhaps is also the reason why most entries in "Nigerian Music Websites" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Nigerian_music_websites are not heavily referenced. One the standard of notability, Naijapals should at least have an entry that can be built upon, as it is more significant than the entries on currently in the Nigerian Music Websites category, giving its age, footprint and overall coverage. The references that I used in the article are also independent and very reliable, example is IT realms, which is published by a Not-For-Profit writer, Remmy Nweke - https://icannwiki.org/Remmy_Nweke and other source at Hiphophead.ng. Generally, I believe the type of coverage on this subject might not bear too much online links, but is extremely significant that lack of it will represent an important knowledge gap that is required to be available on Wiki.

Youpik with citations

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Youpik

backup with citations. please review — Preceding unsigned comment added by Benawitan (talk • contribs) 01:27, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Benawitan, this was still considered advertising and was deleted by WP:G11 AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:39, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Character lists

Is there a rule against or do you have consensus to remove those character lists? --SacredDragonX (talk) 22:30, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Yes, there's been consensus since last year, in fact, that's why the article is repeatedly protected. See the talk page. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:51, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

which talk page? link? --SacredDragonX (talk) 06:12, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

Talk:Universal_Studios_Hollywood#Characters. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 11:23, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

that's one other person from a year ago, and a second person speaking some gibberish I can't make out. That's not exactly what I would call "consensus". However, I do agree that the character lists are pretty poor content, and will try to get more opinions through WP:EAR --SacredDragonX (talk) 07:11, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

SacredDragonX, it's pretty poor consensus as listed, but other editors have chimed in to enforce it as it's one of those indiscriminate lists that can't be maintained. The sourcing provided was mainly fan pages or actual visits to the park. I can't remember if Universal Studios Hollywood itself maintained such an official list and if it did, it didn't mark officially when characters were added or removed. The current one is just brief [1] and not comprehensive. If you want to just add some of the current ones and not a full list, I would be okay with that and having it reference the official website. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 14:00, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

SacredDragonX, I added my comments to that thread. Hope that helps explain my stance. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:32, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

So it's been a while and no one's responded, so i guess no one really cares. Wanted to get your opinion on whether this section should just be removed entirely, and if we should do the same for Japan and Florida. Thanks. --SacredDragonX (talk) 19:48, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

SacredDragonX, I think it should be summarized and trimmed down to the characters on actual websites and that have been talked about in sources. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:55, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Madara Uchiha draft

Just found two more sources involving reviews where they praised Madara's debut in the anime here and here. I guess I'll add them once the article is created.Tintor2 (talk) 23:21, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Tintor2, you can add them to the article. I'm waiting for the redirect to clear before I move the article. Oh, and if you are interested in doing AFC reviews, you can visit Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation and pick up the helper script WP:AFCH. I actually spend more time there than I do with WP:ANIME these days. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:53, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Added other sources I found more. I think that while it needs some work, the reception section is good enough when comparing it with Nagato or Itachi.Tintor2 (talk) 01:21, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

Tintor2, thanks again. I feel a lot better about approving it when it has those sources to back it up for notability. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 01:27, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

Added another. The coverage of the character's reception is pretty good as I think it surpassed Itachi's article. I tried rearranging some sections per introduction, background with Hashirama Senju, and his role in the series. I also added a source about his English actor but finding the Japanese actor info seems harder.Tintor2 (talk) 20:53, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

How does this work? Whenever I created articles I never went through an AFD or something like that. I think there is enough balance of inuniverse and real world information to make it an appealing article that just needs to tide up some prose issues from reception. I already discussed with the user what's the best image to use in the infobox as Kishimoto did one in color that cover most of his body.Tintor2 (talk) 00:44, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Now that I check it, the more reviews we make the more chances Madara's draft will be checked earlier? Do I have to become a participant for this?Tintor2 (talk) 00:10, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Tintor2, I'm waiting for the redirect to be cleared out, then I can move it. In the meantime, I marked it as under review, but you can keep fixing it up (don't worry too much about under review notice for now). AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 00:16, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Change username

Hello, I need some help changing my username and creating a page. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Honorablesculpturesinc (talk • contribs) 18:20, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

Honorablesculpturesinc, there's a link on your talk page that will take you to a form where you can request a new username. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:31, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) Honorablesculpturesinc, the simplest way to change your username is probably to go to Wikipedia:Changing username/Simple, click the blue bar there, and fill in the name you want to use and your reason for requesting the change. You should probably do this fairly quickly, as your present username is pretty inappropriate. You will of course need to avoid making edits relating to topics where you have a conflict of interest, most obviously Austin Weishel. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:49, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

Battle for Dream Island

What isn’t it notable? Its popular! Can’t you see? There is even a book based on the series so why isn’t it notable? Esaïe Prickett (talk) 05:49, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

• See Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Battle for Dream Island. Referencing a Fandom wiki isn't going to help. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 06:44, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Rainbow Bridge

I put the Rainbow Bridge (Literature) Section in the established article on Rainbow Bridge. Thanks.

The established article is a disambiguation page so it doesn't really fit there. Can you check whether the literature refers to the rainbow bridge as the equivalent of the bifrost (norse mythology) or the pets version, or is it literally a bridge that is made out of a rainbow? AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:31, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

un-welcome 'blockage/declined' to draft version of """our next year's local election info" - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:2020_Hyndburn_Borough_Council_election

Hello ANGUS,

I have been maintaining each-and-every annual/local borough council election page, for HYNDBURN (Lancashire), for more-than-a-decade & counting.

On election-day itself / every 1st Thursday in May / I am in regular contact with the officials at my local council office, to get the official/final results for each electoral ward (I've previously made the mistake of 'copying down whatever the local press [hurredly] mistypes into their LIVE REPORTING blogs) --- which isn't a problem, as I MYSELF ONCE-TWICE-THRICE stood as a Candidate myself, and in short *** THEY KNOW ME ***

Usually, a week/fortnight/month or so, after the current election ha concluded, I dig up "the results from the previous 3-yr-old election" - I copy n paste into into a draft version of NEXT YEARS election-page, I revise the layout to match whatever NEWER "pips & whistles" have been used to jazz-up THIS year's [template >>> and retro spectively apply those SAME "pips & whistles" to the earlier-previous-3yr-older wiki page, to maintain a STANDARD look-n-feel]

THIS YEAR - however, was the very FIRST AND ONLY TIME, that a singular/random/anonymous person has chosen to ACTIVELY BLOCK the publication of my/our/LOCAL-Hyndburn-2020-Next-Standard-Election-Cycle, wiki-page.

• • • This is also "MY FIRST TIME", taking up an [issue] with somebody else across the wikipedia-platform ... ... ...

FYI - the very first HYNDBURN-LOCAL-BOROUGH WIKI-PAGE was based on a copy of our (geographcally) neighbouring BURNLEY BOROUGH COUNCIL wiki page .... over the MANY YEARS SINCE, the "HYNDBURN TEMPLATE" has SIGNIFICANTLY ***EVOLVED***, whereas if you browser the Burnely equivalent - you will see that THEY HAVE NOT !

I myself "only tend to the LOCAL BOROUGH COUNCIL / Lowest Tier of Elections" , I DO NOT *mess about with Lancs-County-Council-WIDE wiki-pages (which cover the WHOLE of the Northwest, once every FOURTH YEAR), I only tend to the "1/3rd or seats UP for election, across years 1-2-3 of that SAME 4-year cycle".

FYI - "I" stood in RISHTON-2012 as a Local Ward Council Candidate, was asked to stand as a Lancs-County-Council Candidate in 2013 and stood again as a RISHTON-2014 as a Local Ward Council Candidate ..... I didn't actually get voted IN - however, RISHTON Residents 'still' refer to me as "Councillor Warren".

Respectfully (ANGUS), can you PLEASE remove your objection to the [LIVE] publication of - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:2020_Hyndburn_Borough_Council_election

NB: EVERY PERSON NAMED "Is the SAME person who WON that exact same seat, 3-years again, and who is STILL sitting/acting as a Local Borough Councillor in HYNDBURN and who --- assuming that they don't DROP OUT AT THE LAST MINUTE / OR SIMPLY DROP DEAD / --- they are also the presumptive nominees for re-election, to those SAME SEATS, come MAY-2020 .... a fact that remains UNCHANGED, since one-day-immediately after the previous MAY-2019-Elections results are 'called'.

Typically, it is only "exactly one calendar month, before the election day" after the final DEADLINE for "last minute entries for New Challengers, Independents, or Public-Notices of a sitting-councillor choosing to STEP DOWN - letting some 'unknown' Candidate's name to 'suddenly appear' on the ballot --- at which time "I" immediately TWEAK THIS "DRAFT PAGE" ACCORDINGLY ---- othwerwise, 9-times-outta-10, its the same old faces&names/time after time.

(ANGUS) "Thankyou for your consideration" ...

Regards Mr. Warren Lee Melia, B.Sc.(Hons) - HYNDBURN, Lancashire - — Preceding unsigned comment added by Warrenlm (talk • contribs) 14:00, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

At this point the event is still too early to be of any use. There aren't even any opposing candidates who have filed registration. No independent news articles have talked about 2020 election yet. As soon as those are getting filled in, then that would be the appropriate time to introduce the article into mainspace. Otherwise it's WP:CRYSTAL. There isn't even any indication that the incumbents are going to rerun. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:28, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

I started a thread at Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(events)#How_soon_can_someone_post_about_the_next_election? AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:37, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

The Window of Orpheus & Eikou no Napoleon – Eroica

There's the list with characters, but it's not complete and they don't have their description yet, and a plot. Can you do it with a full translation from ja.wikipedia? Thank you very much. --95.248.236.31 07:34, 4 September 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.248.236.31 (talk)

Review

@AngusWOOF: you recently review this draft. But I don't understand what is the connection of author with this book.The author is notable or not it’s not the issue.This article about book and the book subject person is also notable. This book is independently notable, what's Wikipedia requirement. All added verified and sources, added three two review of this book. And this book is one of the best selling book in 2016 in national book fair. This book deserve independent article.