Talk:Britney Spears/to do: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
*Resolve self-redirect via Jason Allen Alexander |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
*the article also has a very messy supporting article base, many needing serious cleanup. |
*the article also has a very messy supporting article base, many needing serious cleanup. |
||
*I'd suggest to do a lot of paragraph merging - keep them nice and long. (I think the size of the paragraghs are perfect right now, if you merge them I think it will look like a mess) |
*I'd suggest to do a lot of paragraph merging - keep them nice and long. (I think the size of the paragraghs are perfect right now, if you merge them I think it will look like a mess) |
||
*Resolve self-redirect via [[Jason Allen Alexander]] |
|||
Revision as of 19:07, 1 December 2006
- To Prepare for FA STATUS, from Peer Review:
- Sparse inline citations, and many of the ones that are there aren't high quality.
- Get more critical analysis of her work (look up reviews in Rolling Stone, Entertainment Weekly, newspapers of large cities, etc.).
- Fill in 2 citations
- Format external links in the text
- fair use rationales
- It is mainly structural and syntactical issues like this that which separate it from FA status - there are plenty of facts but they are poorly presented and organised.
- the article also has a very messy supporting article base, many needing serious cleanup.
- I'd suggest to do a lot of paragraph merging - keep them nice and long. (I think the size of the paragraghs are perfect right now, if you merge them I think it will look like a mess)
- Resolve self-redirect via Jason Allen Alexander