Talk:John Bolton/Archive 2/to do: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
Nominated for deletion; see Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:John R. Bolton/to do. (TW) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{mfd|help=off}} |
|||
* How to update and correct the sidebar box and the bottom box to show that Bolton left the post of UN Ambassador in December 2006?? |
* How to update and correct the sidebar box and the bottom box to show that Bolton left the post of UN Ambassador in December 2006?? |
||
* Would be cool to see information on Bolton's tenure in the UN. What did he do? |
* Would be cool to see information on Bolton's tenure in the UN. What did he do? |
||
Revision as of 21:53, 10 September 2019
| This talk page is being considered for deletion in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policy.
Please discuss the matter at this page's entry on the Miscellany for deletion page. You are welcome to edit this page, but please do not blank, merge, or move it, or remove this notice, while the discussion is in progress. For more information, see the Guide to deletion. |
- How to update and correct the sidebar box and the bottom box to show that Bolton left the post of UN Ambassador in December 2006??
- Would be cool to see information on Bolton's tenure in the UN. What did he do?
- I found a great page for John Bolton quotes. Noticed there's already a quotations section and I think they could be a great addition to the page. Bolton Quotes
- Expand to include history of Bolton's participation in the Buckley vs Valeo case in the 1970s. He assisted in representing both Eugene McCarthy and James Buckley in this case concerning election law and has been known to be an expert on election law since that time.Sompdimp 09:03, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
- Do not include the Lynne Finney calumny. Adequate research would reveal that this is another of the false allegations, like that of Flynt, that were levelled at Bolton for partisan purposes during the confirmation battle and subsequently dropped because of lack of any credible evidence. Just because it is hard for a public figure to prosecute libel or slander is no reason for an "encyclopedia" article to reprint what is obviously false.Sompdimp 09:03, 12 November 2006 (UTC)