Jump to content

Talk:Chicken McNuggets: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 915210345 by 73.71.251.64 (talk)
Undid revision 915220759 by Acroterion (talk) no
Line 99: Line 99:


I'm unclear about what makes the items in the Controversies section controversial. In the first paragraph, a judge is quoted as using the perjorative "McFrankenstein" simply because not all the ingredients are used by home cooks but doesn't explain why that is a problem. In the second paragraph, a university professor is quoted as saying that McNuggets probably aren't harmful but thinks that people shouldn't eat an "ingredient you can't pronounce" but doesn't explain why that is a problem. The third paragraph describes an anti-foaming agent and preservative used in McNuggets that apparently are commonly used in other food products. Nothing in the Controversies section claims that McNuggets are any more harmful, fattening, non-nutritional, poor tasting, or a poorer value than most other processed foods. So, again, what's controversial about them? [[User:Primogen|Primogen]] ([[User talk:Primogen|talk]]) 01:43, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
I'm unclear about what makes the items in the Controversies section controversial. In the first paragraph, a judge is quoted as using the perjorative "McFrankenstein" simply because not all the ingredients are used by home cooks but doesn't explain why that is a problem. In the second paragraph, a university professor is quoted as saying that McNuggets probably aren't harmful but thinks that people shouldn't eat an "ingredient you can't pronounce" but doesn't explain why that is a problem. The third paragraph describes an anti-foaming agent and preservative used in McNuggets that apparently are commonly used in other food products. Nothing in the Controversies section claims that McNuggets are any more harmful, fattening, non-nutritional, poor tasting, or a poorer value than most other processed foods. So, again, what's controversial about them? [[User:Primogen|Primogen]] ([[User talk:Primogen|talk]]) 01:43, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

{{editrequest}}
Reference to the [https://casetext.com/case/pelman-v-mcdonalds-corporation-sdny-2003?resultsNav=false#p543 ruling] in question shows that the article text is false. The judge in Pelman v. McDonald's did not "identify" the ingredients, among McDonald's list of ingredients, that make the product a "McFrankenstein" (whatever that may be). Therefore the sentence stating that he did should be removed. I am not sure that the remaining, short sentence would stand on its own. [[Special:Contributions/73.71.251.64|73.71.251.64]] ([[User talk:73.71.251.64|talk]]) 07:47, 1 September 2019 (UTC)


== External links modified ==
== External links modified ==

Revision as of 18:04, 13 September 2019

WikiProject iconFood and drink: Foodservice Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Related taskforces:
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Foodservice task force (assessed as Low-importance).
Food and Drink task list:
To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:
Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.
WikiProject iconBrands Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Portion Sizes

It seems that the 9 and 10 figures are interchanged every so often. Can someone confirm a market that has the nine piece still? I have packaging to back up a 10 piece... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Modor (talkcontribs) 08:53, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Both French and German McDonalds sell the 9-piece packages, for example. --Fritz S. (Talk) 11:52, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Although the above link doesn't seem to work anymore, I can confirm that Germany still has the 9-piece. If desired, I can take pictures. --134.2.190.254 (talk) 10:23, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1983 Introduction

  • Chicken McNuggets were introduced in the Lawton, Oklahoma area around 1981. This was, I assume, a test market. The McChicken was not available at the locations with McNuggets. McDonald's locations in other areas introduced McNuggets after the original McChicken, but in Southwest Oklahoma, McNuggets have been available, without interruption since 1981. I say this from firsthand experience, thus I've not added it to the article. --Aaron Walden 00:27, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Given that this was twenty some years ago I'm hoping that someone else can confirm my recollection. I believe that when Chicken McNuggets were first introduced in the Seattle Washington area, they were bundled as a five piece McNuggets with a small french fry called "Chicken and Chips".Jsbrugg 05:05, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • You didn't imagine it. Definitely had Chicken and Chips in the Detroit suburbs back around 82 or so. Good luck finding cites, though. As I recall, they were slightly different, a bit less breading on the nuggets than later on, though the first time I had actual McNuggets, (Flint, MI suburbs ~83) they were that way too. They clearly tinkered with the recipe a bit early on. 76.226.205.69 (talk) 09:37, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • It must have been easy to find work (and McNuggets) back then. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.25.105.176 (talk) 02:56, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • I remember them being introduced in late 1980 in the Tri-State NY area128.82.253.41 (talk) 21:11, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Can someone find a referenced source for the introduction? According to the Washington Post, it was 1983. Would it be fair to say something along the lines of "The McNugget was released in various test markets in the early 1980's and was released nationwide (worldwide?) in 1983" ?

(link to post article : http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/washingtonpost/access/419392491.html?dids=419392491:419392491&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Oct+06%2C+2003&author=&pub=The+Washington+Post&desc=McDonald%27s++Plans+Leaner++McNugget&pqatl=google) DFS (talk) 08:48, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Test markets began selling the McNuggets in late-1980 in test markets and the McNuggets were rolled out into all US restaurants by the end of 1982.

15:06, 9 February 2010 (UTC0 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.227.126.225 (talk)

Sauces

I've never seen buffalo sauce served with nuggets before. Can someone check this out ROASTYTOAST 18:16, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've worked at a McDonalds in Texas, and you can get buffalo sauce with nuggets, you have to ask for it though. They don't offer it because it's bigger than the other sauce packets. Pooleyusk (talk) 20:20, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You can get it in Albuqerque, NM. 76.113.127.34 (talk) 01:25, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dietary info

Recently, McDonalds Australia released nine meals that are endorsed by the Heart Foundation and have their (literal) Tick of Approval. One or two of these meals (I'll go check that) include three Mcnuggets and a salad plus a drink of either orange juice or water (again, I'll go check). The Tick means that Mcnuggets must comply with the Heart Foundation's recommendations including having low sodium/low sugar/low fat, which seems to imply that Maccas Australia (if not other countries) have changed their recipe somewhat. (The McChicken burger is also added as one of the nine Tick-approved meals. Note that we Aussies call them burgers, you call them sandwiches). I'm wondering if, when I find the info, it is advantageous to the article to include that-

  • nuggets are approved by the Heart Foundation in small portions
  • possibly there are significent nutritional differences in McNuggets from the US (or the world) than Australia

Naturally, all such inclusions are cited with appropriate resources. Would love to hear other opinions :) Naysie 06:48, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, the McDonalds and the Tick-approved meals are found at http://www.mcdonalds.com.au/HTML/ourFood/tickApprovedMeals.asp# (note that the Heart Foundation is not affliated with McDonalds and all the requirements for getting a food Tick-approved can be found at the Heart Foundation's website). Dietary info for all McDonalds Australia foods can be found at http://www.mcdonalds.com.au/HTML/nutrition/ and are available as PDF downloads. Naysie 06:56, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The box for 6 piece Chicken McNuggets say 600mg of sodium. [[[Special:Contributions/68.5.92.32|68.5.92.32]] (talk) 04:38, 9 September 2009 (UTC)][reply]

Humane nuggets

Does anyone know if it's necessary to kill the chicken to remove its nuggets?--G-Dett 03:11, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

it's made from breast meat, so i'm guessing it's far more humane to kill the poor critter first..WotherspoonSmith 09:01, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
lol, I don't think he/she is being serious.(74.15.9.5 (talk) 03:09, 5 June 2008 (UTC))[reply]
heh heh, funny. you know, all this nutrition stuff aside, these things are freakin' delicious.--FUNKAMATIC ~talk 17:54, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Chopsticks

I just had to note that I learned how to use chopsticks as a child when McDonald's had the Asian dipping sauce promotion with Chicken McNuggets. As I eat and professionally cook many Asian cuisines now, I wonder if I owe that influence to McDonald's, the irony.--Christopher Tanner, CCC 19:11, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also did you notice that they're pretty much tempura-battered? Almost nobody else does that with their nuggets (theyre usually just breaded)... especially frozen grocery store brands. Only recently has Tyson put out a similarly battered-not-breaded nugget. Breading is gross. Batter rocks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.122.63.142 (talk) 16:06, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

two shapes or three?

i'm sure i can make out three different nugget shapes, not just the two mentioned. One is a boot shape, one kinda round, one kinda diamond shaped. i have no idea if this is international (i'm in Australia). anyone care to do some investigation? i'd hate such a crucial piece of information to be spread by wikipedia... WotherspoonSmith 09:01, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Three. [1] --Fritz S. (Talk) 09:58, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
thanks Fritz. Will edit the front page now.WotherspoonSmith 11:17, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

origin of McNugget shapes?

It seems there's a few people watching these pages, so I thought I'd throw out a question for you all. I'm pretty sure the statement blablahblahblah!!!!! sources, though, about McNuggets. Anyone have a source, clues for googling- or objections if I just delete the sentences about shapes? WotherspoonSmith 12:39, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

THE ROUND ONES TASTE THE BEST!!! YUMMY YUMMY!!! BOCK...BOCK BOCK BOCK....!!! HEHEHEHEHEHE!!! 67.163.67.150 21:03, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and carefull attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 17:22, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Who is Ivan Martinez

The article says the following: "Eventually, Ivan Martinez, a yeeee! the nuggets with all white meat"

So my question, of course, is how Ivan Martinez has anything to do with this article(?) Fatrb38 (talk) 07:53, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

San Ysidro McDonald's massacre

As far as I can tell, some attorney tried to make a claim against McNuggets that ultimately failed. As a result, I don't think it really belongs in *this* article. Sure, it belongs in the massacre article, but not here. If McNuggets had been found to be a contributing factor by the courts, then I might agree it belongs here. Rklawton (talk) 15:23, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have to agree, the section doesn't even say that they tried to make a claim against McNuggets, it's worded saying they made a claim against McDonalds food in general which happened to include the nuggets (and as it's worded I'm lead to believe the claim also included fries and other foods as well). Either someone needs to find a source specifically linking that McNuggets received serious connection to the massacre/trial in the media, and then re-write the section accordingly, or the section should be deleted as it has no place in this article in it's current form.24.190.34.219 (talk) 14:21, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I've removed the section. Rklawton (talk) 14:37, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Super Size Me

I don't think the movie "Super Size Me" is a reliable source. For example, Chicken McNuggets most certainly are not "freeze dried" after frying. They are "flash frozen." There's got to be a lot of reliable information about this item, surely we can find better sources. Rklawton (talk) 15:26, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

50 piece

I've seen it, but yes, a reliable source would help. Rklawton (talk) 09:48, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This was around for the Superbowl in 2009 and possibly years before. The article says it was introduced in 2010. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.181.255.167 (talk) 15:25, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

platypus meat? Seriously?

Some one has removed the wonderful section about playpuses. This is incorrect, inconsistent, and should be changed back to platypuses. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.232.60.106 (talk) 17:21, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Little People" caption on image

"Little people PETA activists demonstrating in New York City's Times Square against how McDonald's kills chickens to make McNuggets."

Is saying they are "little people" relevant to the article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gemralts (talkcontribs) 01:54, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

1980?

Are there indeed some sources that state 1980 as the introduction date, and if so, are these sources significant enough that we need to bring them to the reader's attention? Rklawton (talk) 01:09, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On the Controversies section

Just adding to the discussion, but the person quoted first in that section wasn't too educated--leavening is normal household use! You use it every time you add eggs, baking soda, baking powder, or even water to a baked recipe! 96.231.159.82 (talk) 20:43, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm unclear about what makes the items in the Controversies section controversial. In the first paragraph, a judge is quoted as using the perjorative "McFrankenstein" simply because not all the ingredients are used by home cooks but doesn't explain why that is a problem. In the second paragraph, a university professor is quoted as saying that McNuggets probably aren't harmful but thinks that people shouldn't eat an "ingredient you can't pronounce" but doesn't explain why that is a problem. The third paragraph describes an anti-foaming agent and preservative used in McNuggets that apparently are commonly used in other food products. Nothing in the Controversies section claims that McNuggets are any more harmful, fattening, non-nutritional, poor tasting, or a poorer value than most other processed foods. So, again, what's controversial about them? Primogen (talk) 01:43, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chicken McNuggets. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:06, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chicken McNuggets. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:50, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]