User talk:Zinzhanglee

Pls let me know what to do improve the article Prabal Kumar Basu. I want to do the necessary editing to be placed and published it in wikipedia.

Welcome

Hello, Zinzhanglee, and Welcome to Wikipedia!   

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

---

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

• Table of contents / Department directory

• The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
• The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

• Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
• Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
• Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

• Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
• The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
• Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

• Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

• Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

• Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
• If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Zinzhanglee, good luck, and have fun. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 14:57, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

Indian School Ajman

Hi I'm Barkeep49. I have declined your nomination of Indian School Ajman for speedy deletion. As a school, it is not eligible for WP:A7 as the bolded text points out. Further, the page is neutrally written enough to not be considered unambiguous advertising requiring a fundamental rewrite to be appropriate. If you have any questions about this or other speedy deletion criteria, please don't hesitate to ping me here or leave a message on my talk page. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 03:03, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Ok, @Barkeep49: I agree with you. Thanks for your contributions. Zinzhanglee (talk) 03:12, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Deletion of THE Prabal Kumar Basu

Please Don't delete the article namely "Prabal Kumar Basu". Let me know the process what to do to improve the article. I will link the references with the article. I have removed the external links. Within few days I will edit the external links with connection to the main article. Please give me some time to these editing. As per my best knowledge all the datas given in the article is genuine. Thanks. Dass sundaram (talk) 05:50, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Why you are so eager to save this article. Do you have any conflict of interest with this person? Zinzhanglee (talk) 09:48, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	helle Sir, I have carefully edited the the article namely Prabal Kumar Basu with references and proper citation. please pgo through it. pls dont delete this srticle. all informations provided in this article is true as per my best knowledge. Dass sundaram (talk) 04:46, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zinzhanglee (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello, Anyone please review why I can't edit. I think its a mistake Zinzhanglee (talk) 12:16, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 12:35, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zinzhanglee (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am doing only useful edits to Wikipedia and will always continue to do so. I don't have any connection with anyone for any work I do. I guess there is some problem with my area IP range which has caused this problem. It is a very populated area. Please review my request. I hereby declare:

that the block was not necessary to prevent damage or disruption. This block is no longer necessary because I have understood the issue for what I blocked for, I will not do it again, and I will make productive contributions instead. I only conduct (under any account or IP address) is not connected in any way with the block (this can happen if a block is aimed at resolving a separate situation and I am unintentionally blocked as a result because I use the same IP range. Zinzhanglee (talk) 12:54, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This does not address the reasons for the block. MER-C 16:58, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Zinzhanglee (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I understand now why I have been blocked. It is due to I commented keep vote without checking COI editing on Kelvin Wu article. I really don't know that this article has COI issues. I just gave Keep vote on the basis of seeing above references. There is not me any personal intention to save that article nor do I have a connection with that person and other wiki editors. Please have a look at the wiki contributions I have only intended to provide good-faith work in Wikipedia. And I still want to do it. Please have a look at my request. From now on I will be more carefull in AFD voting. I again define that I don't have any connection with Kelvin Wu and other editors. I do edit in wikipedia for good faith. And want to do it again if given secone chance. Please admins I request you to please give me a chance. I will be very useful Zinzhanglee (talk) 17:19, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I understand now why I have been blocked. It is due to I commented keep vote without checking COI editing on Kelvin Wu article. I really don't know that this article has COI issues. I just gave Keep vote on the basis of seeing above references. There is not me any personal intention to save that article nor do I have a connection with that person and other wiki editors. Please have a look at the wiki contributions I have only intended to provide good-faith work in Wikipedia. And I still want to do it. Please have a look at my request. From now on I will be more carefull in AFD voting. I again define that I don't have any connection with Kelvin Wu and other editors. I do edit in wikipedia for good faith. And want to do it again if given secone chance. Please admins I request you to please give me a chance. I will be very useful [[User:Zinzhanglee|Zinzhanglee]] ([[User talk:Zinzhanglee#top|talk]]) 17:19, 20 September 2019 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I understand now why I have been blocked. It is due to I commented keep vote without checking COI editing on Kelvin Wu article. I really don't know that this article has COI issues. I just gave Keep vote on the basis of seeing above references. There is not me any personal intention to save that article nor do I have a connection with that person and other wiki editors. Please have a look at the wiki contributions I have only intended to provide good-faith work in Wikipedia. And I still want to do it. Please have a look at my request. From now on I will be more carefull in AFD voting. I again define that I don't have any connection with Kelvin Wu and other editors. I do edit in wikipedia for good faith. And want to do it again if given secone chance. Please admins I request you to please give me a chance. I will be very useful [[User:Zinzhanglee|Zinzhanglee]] ([[User talk:Zinzhanglee#top|talk]]) 17:19, 20 September 2019 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I understand now why I have been blocked. It is due to I commented keep vote without checking COI editing on Kelvin Wu article. I really don't know that this article has COI issues. I just gave Keep vote on the basis of seeing above references. There is not me any personal intention to save that article nor do I have a connection with that person and other wiki editors. Please have a look at the wiki contributions I have only intended to provide good-faith work in Wikipedia. And I still want to do it. Please have a look at my request. From now on I will be more carefull in AFD voting. I again define that I don't have any connection with Kelvin Wu and other editors. I do edit in wikipedia for good faith. And want to do it again if given secone chance. Please admins I request you to please give me a chance. I will be very useful [[User:Zinzhanglee|Zinzhanglee]] ([[User talk:Zinzhanglee#top|talk]]) 17:19, 20 September 2019 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}