User talk:24.91.94.125: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 00:58, 3 December 2006

Your edit to Zerg

Your recent edit to Zerg (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 02:28, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages or sections with blank content, as you did to User talk:24.91.94.125. It is considered vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Hu12 02:30, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank pages, as you did to User talk:24.91.94.125, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Hu12 02:38, 30 November 2006 (UTC

Why remove messages?

Simply I think there rather private messages that arn't very worthy of being featured in an encyclopedia.I mean why the fuck should a private message/warning be not removed?Wikipedia isn't a chat discussion fools.I rather suggest a an actual wikiproject with private messages.Now I know there are dicussions are for editing help but for warnings seriously?I don't agree that removing a message is vandalism.It's a simple PERSONAL MESSAGE THATS NOT RELATED TO AN ENCYCLOPEDIA OTHER THEN USERS.And please ill be blocked for removing these?That my sir is retarded.Anyway I apperciate if you could debate me on this.Thanks Btw im still waiting a response.

Revision as of 19:39, 30 November 2006 edit 24.91.94.125 (talk) Why remove messages? ← Previous edit		Revision as of 00:58, 3 December 2006 edit undo 24.91.94.125 (talk) No edit summary Next edit →
Line 8:		Line 8:
	== Why remove messages? ==		== Why remove messages? ==

	Simply I think there rather private messages that arn't very worthy of being featured in an encyclopedia.I mean why the fuck should a private message/warning be not removed?Wikipedia isn't a chat discussion fools.I rather suggest a an actual wikiproject with private messages.Now I know there are dicussions are for editing help but for warnings seriously?I don't agree that removing a message is vandalism.It's a simple PERSONAL MESSAGE THATS NOT RELATED TO AN ENCYCLOPEDIA OTHER THEN USERS.And please ill be blocked for removing these?That my sir is retarded.Anyway I apperciate if you could debate me on this.Thanks		Simply I think there rather private messages that arn't very worthy of being featured in an encyclopedia.I mean why the fuck should a private message/warning be not removed?Wikipedia isn't a chat discussion fools.I rather suggest a an actual wikiproject with private messages.Now I know there are dicussions are for editing help but for warnings seriously?I don't agree that removing a message is vandalism.It's a simple PERSONAL MESSAGE THATS NOT RELATED TO AN ENCYCLOPEDIA OTHER THEN USERS.And please ill be blocked for removing these?That my sir is retarded.Anyway I apperciate if you could debate me on this.Thanks Btw im still waiting a response.