Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hattons of London: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 14:45, 18 October 2019

Hattons of London

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. scope_creep^Talk 00:17, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:17, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:18, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - In my WP:BEFORE mostly what I could find were brief mentions in coverage of the sale of specific coins, or equally brief mentions in the winning of minor prizes. Inclusion on this list and this profile piece in the same local paper was probably the closest in terms of WP:SIGCOV, but then there's WP:AUD to consider and even ignoring WP:AUD we still need coverage in different publications. Such is the popularity of numatism that I'm pretty sure they'll become sufficiently notable enough to warrant an article at some point in the future, but not now. Fails WP:CORP. FOARP (talk) 11:50, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I notice the company is doing TV adverts in the UK. I saw one last night. I thought it was the British mint advertising the coins, but it's them. They have been doing it for a good while, same format. By the end of this year they will probably be very well known, certainly in the UK. scope_creep^Talk 10:45, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:PROMO. --K.e.coffman (talk) 03:48, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Thank you for sharing your feedback, I contributed to article amendments during August. Whilst there are references to regional media titles such as Stoke Sentinel, however I have included the Sunday Times article as a reference. Sources were not limited to regional media – alongside the Sunday Times, I counted Real Business, UK charity SSAFA and Daily Record. I appreciate the above comments about the enduring popularity of numismatics and the impact of our TV advertising. I would like to counter these point - I think a company that has been profiled by the Sunday Times must be regarded as being of importance and notable. Of course, any further insight or guidance you could provide to help me publish the draft would be very helpful.

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 *'''Comment''' I notice the company is doing TV adverts in the UK. I saw one last night. I thought it was the British mint advertising the coins, but it's them. They have been doing it for a good while, same format.  By the end of this year they will probably be very well known, certainly in the UK. '''<span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px black; font-family:Papyrus">[[User:scope_creep|<span style="color:#3399ff">scope_creep</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:scope_creep#top|Talk]]</sup></span>''' 10:45, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''': Fails [[WP:CORPDEPTH]] and [[WP:PROMO]]. --[[User:K.e.coffman|K.e.coffman]] ([[User talk:K.e.coffman|talk]]) 03:48, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
+*'''Comment''' Thank you for sharing your feedback, I contributed to article amendments during August. Whilst there are references to regional media titles such as Stoke Sentinel, however I have included the Sunday Times article as a reference. Sources were not limited to regional media – alongside the Sunday Times, I counted Real Business, UK charity SSAFA and Daily Record. I appreciate the above comments about the enduring popularity of numismatics and the impact of our TV advertising. I would like to counter these point - I think a company that has been profiled by the Sunday Times must be regarded as being of importance and notable. Of course, any further insight or guidance you could provide to help me publish the draft would be very helpful.