Inclusion map: Difference between revisions
Joel Brennan (talk | contribs) m this reads better |
Joel Brennan (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
is simply to say that {{math|⋆}} is consistently computed in the sub-structure and the large structure. The case of a [[unary operation]] is similar; but one should also look at [[nullary]] operations, which pick out a ''constant'' element. Here the point is that [[closure (mathematics)|closure]] means such constants must already be given in the substructure. |
is simply to say that {{math|⋆}} is consistently computed in the sub-structure and the large structure. The case of a [[unary operation]] is similar; but one should also look at [[nullary]] operations, which pick out a ''constant'' element. Here the point is that [[closure (mathematics)|closure]] means such constants must already be given in the substructure. |
||
Inclusion maps are seen in algebraic topology where if {{mvar|A}} is a [[strong deformation retract]] of {{mvar|X}}, the inclusion map yields an isomorphism between all homotopy groups (that is, it is a [[Homotopy|homotopy equivalence]]). |
Inclusion maps are seen in [[algebraic topology]] where if {{mvar|A}} is a [[strong deformation retract]] of {{mvar|X}}, the inclusion map yields an [[Group isomorphism|isomorphism]] between all [[homotopy groups]] (that is, it is a [[Homotopy|homotopy equivalence]]). |
||
Inclusion maps in [[geometry]] come in different kinds: for example [[embedding]]s of [[submanifold]]s. [[Covariance and contravariance of functors|Contravariant]] objects (which is to say, objects that have [[pullback]]s; these are called [[covariance and contravariance of vectors|covariant]] in an older and unrelated terminology) such as [[differential form]]s ''restrict'' to submanifolds, giving a mapping in the ''other direction''. Another example, more sophisticated, is that of [[affine scheme]]s, for which the inclusions |
Inclusion maps in [[geometry]] come in different kinds: for example [[embedding]]s of [[submanifold]]s. [[Covariance and contravariance of functors|Contravariant]] objects (which is to say, objects that have [[pullback]]s; these are called [[covariance and contravariance of vectors|covariant]] in an older and unrelated terminology) such as [[differential form]]s ''restrict'' to submanifolds, giving a mapping in the ''other direction''. Another example, more sophisticated, is that of [[affine scheme]]s, for which the inclusions |
||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
:<math>\operatorname{Spec}\left(R/I^2\right) \to \operatorname{Spec}(R)</math> |
:<math>\operatorname{Spec}\left(R/I^2\right) \to \operatorname{Spec}(R)</math> |
||
may be different [[morphism]]s, where {{mvar|R}} is a [[commutative ring]] and {{mvar|I}} an [[ideal (ring theory)|ideal]]. |
may be different [[morphism]]s, where {{mvar|R}} is a [[commutative ring]] and {{mvar|I}} is an [[ideal (ring theory)|ideal]] of {{mvar|R}}. |
||
== See also == |
== See also == |
Revision as of 19:02, 19 October 2019
In mathematics, if A is a subset of B, then the inclusion map (also inclusion function, insertion,[1] or canonical injection) is the function ι that sends each element x of A to x, treated as an element of B:
A "hooked arrow" (U+21AA ↪ RIGHTWARDS ARROW WITH HOOK)[2] is sometimes used in place of the function arrow above to denote an inclusion map; thus:
(On the other hand, this notation is sometimes reserved for embeddings.)
This and other analogous injective functions[3] from substructures are sometimes called natural injections.
Given any morphism f between objects X and Y, if there is an inclusion map into the domain ι : A → X, then one can form the restriction f ι of f. In many instances, one can also construct a canonical inclusion into the codomain R → Y known as the range of f.
Applications of inclusion maps
Inclusion maps tend to be homomorphisms of algebraic structures; thus, such inclusion maps are embeddings. More precisely, given a substructure closed under some operations, the inclusion map will be an embedding for tautological reasons. For example, for some binary operation ⋆, to require that
is simply to say that ⋆ is consistently computed in the sub-structure and the large structure. The case of a unary operation is similar; but one should also look at nullary operations, which pick out a constant element. Here the point is that closure means such constants must already be given in the substructure.
Inclusion maps are seen in algebraic topology where if A is a strong deformation retract of X, the inclusion map yields an isomorphism between all homotopy groups (that is, it is a homotopy equivalence).
Inclusion maps in geometry come in different kinds: for example embeddings of submanifolds. Contravariant objects (which is to say, objects that have pullbacks; these are called covariant in an older and unrelated terminology) such as differential forms restrict to submanifolds, giving a mapping in the other direction. Another example, more sophisticated, is that of affine schemes, for which the inclusions
and
may be different morphisms, where R is a commutative ring and I is an ideal of R.
See also
References
- ^ MacLane, S.; Birkhoff, G. (1967). Algebra. Providence, RI: AMS Chelsea Publishing. p. 5. ISBN 0-8218-1646-2.
Note that "insertion" is a function S → U and "inclusion" a relation S ⊂ U; every inclusion relation gives rise to an insertion function.
- ^ "Arrows – Unicode" (PDF). Unicode Consortium. Retrieved 2017-02-07.
- ^ Chevalley, C. (1956). Fundamental Concepts of Algebra. New York, NY: Academic Press. p. 1. ISBN 0-12-172050-0.
External links
Media related to Inclusion map at Wikimedia Commons