Jump to content

Spending Review: Difference between revisions

Edit links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
m i helped
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''''luke is a big no
'''''luke is a big no
follow EXTRACTZ on yt
follow EXTRACTZ on yt
hello richard
hello richard'''''
richard u big gay'''''


Spending Reviews typically focus upon one or several aspects of public spending while Comprehensive Spending Reviews focus upon each government department's spending requirements from a zero base (i.e. without reference to past plans or, initially, current expenditure). The latter are named after the year in which they are announced – thus ''CSR07'' (completed in October 2007) applies to financial years 2008–2011.


Other developed countries have similar review processes, e.g. [[Canada]], [[New Zealand]], [[Netherlands|The Netherlands]],<ref>{{Cite web|url = http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=GOV/PGC/SBO(2013)6&doclanguage=en|title = OECD journal, SPENDING REVIEWS|website = }}</ref> [[Italy]], [[Ireland]],<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.per.gov.ie/comprehensive-review-of-expenditure/comprehensive-expenditure-report-2012-2014/|title=– Comprehensive Expenditure Report 2012 – 2014|website=www.per.gov.ie}}</ref> and [[France]]. France conducted [[French General Review of Public Policies|its first comprehensive spending review]] (called in French "''la Revue Générale des Politiques Publiques''") in 2008. [[Netherlands|The Netherlands]] have been carrying out spending reviews since 1981.

==2007 Comprehensive Spending Review==
The UK's 2007 Comprehensive Spending Review included three significant changes. The first was that it represented the first test of the capacity of the Spending Review process to plan and deliver a discretionary fiscal consolidation in the UK. The previous four Spending Reviews took place during a period of steady public growth in the economy from 37% in 1999–00 to 42% by 2007–08. As both the UK's then fiscal rules (the Golden rule and the sustainable investment rule) began to bite{{vague|date=October 2010}}{{Citation needed|date=October 2010}}, the UK government desired to halve the real rate of growth in public spending from 4% per annum over the last decade to 2% per annum over the next three years – a 0.5% below than the trend rate of growth of the economy. A second noteworthy development in the 2007 CSR was a marked extension in the certainty that the UK system now provides to public sector managers about their future budgets. Finally, CSR07 saw the UK's public service 110 largely departmental-based Public Service Agreements consolidated into 30 inter-departmental agreements.

{{anchor|2010 Spending Review}}

==2010 Spending Review==
A spending review for the years 2011/12 through to 2014/15 was announced by the [[Cameron–Clegg coalition|coalition government]]. This review was driven by a desire to reduce government spending in order to cut the [[Deficit spending|budget deficit]].<ref>[http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20071204130420/http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/Spending_Review/spend_index.cfm An introduction to Spending Review] HM Treasury website in the UK Government Web Archive. Retrieved 26 August 2014</ref>

[[Chancellor of the Exchequer]] [[George Osborne]] announced the details of the spending review on 20 October 2010.<ref>{{cite news| url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-11585312 | work=BBC News | title=Spending Review: Reaction to Osborne statement | date=20 October 2010|accessdate=9 March 2013}}</ref> The cuts have been described as the biggest since World War II.<ref name="BBC">{{cite news|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-11579979|title=Spending Review 2010|publisher=BBC News|accessdate=21 October 2010|date=20 October 2010}}</ref> The review would lead to an £81 billion cut in public spending in the remaining 4 years of the parliament, with average departmental cuts of 19%. In addition major changes in welfare were announced including £7 billion of extra welfare cuts, changes to incapacity benefit, housing benefit and tax credits and a rise in the state pension age to 66 from 2020.<ref name="BBC"/> Public sector employees will face a £3.5 billion increase in public pension contributions.

The [[Home Office]] faced cuts of 25%,<ref name="Guardianreview"/> local councils would face a yearly 7% cut in funding from central government each year until 2014.<ref name="Guardianreview"/> The [[Ministry of Defence (United Kingdom)|Ministry of Defence]] faced cuts of around 8%. In addition many other public sector bodies had cuts to their funding.<ref name="Guardianreview"/> Although not part of government the [[BBC]] had its licence fee frozen for 6 years and will take on the funding of the [[BBC World Service]], [[BBC Monitoring]] and [[S4C]].<ref name="Guardianreview"/>
The [[Office for Budget Responsibility]] predicts that the spending review will lead to a loss of about 490,000 public sector jobs by 2015.<ref name="Guardianreview">{{cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2010/oct/20/spending-review-2010-key-points|title=Spending review 2010:key points at a glance|work=Guardian|accessdate=21 October 2010|date=20 October 2010|location=London}}</ref>
The [[National Health Service|NHS]] will see a 0.4% increase in spending in real terms over the following 4 years.<ref name="Guardianreview"/>

A£200 million payment was announced to compensate savers in the collapsed savings society [[Presbyterian Mutual]].<ref>[http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/bb7e9f28-dc45-11df-a9a4-00144feabdc0.html £200m pledged for collapsed N Irish mutual]. Retrieved 9 March 2013</ref>

A report published in late 2013 by Trust for London and the London School of Economics and Political Science estimated that local government budgets in London had taken a 33% real terms cut in central government funding for local government between 2009/10 and 2013/14.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.trustforlondon.org.uk/research/publication/new-report-impact-of-local-government-spending-cuts-in-london/|title=Hard Times, New Directions, The Impact of the Local Government Spending Cuts in London|work=trustforlondon.org.uk}}</ref>

==See also==
*[[Multiannual Financial Framework]]
==References==
{{reflist|30em}}

==External links==
*Justin Tyson [http://blog-pfm.imf.org/pfmblog/2007/11/implementing-a-.html Implementing a 'Spending Review' -- Italy Seeks to Improve the Quality of Public Expenditure] International Monetary Fund, 12 November 2007
*Richard Hughes [http://blog-pfm.imf.org/pfmblog/2008/05/united-kingdom.html#more United Kingdom Concludes Its Fifth Multi-Annual Spending Round] International Monetary Fund, 5 May 2008
*[http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/spend_index.htm HM Treasury - Spending Review 2010]
*[https://www.theguardian.com/politics/spending-review Guardian Special Report - Spending Review 2010]
*[http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20070705125253/hm-treasury.gov.uk/spending_review/spend_sr04/spend_sr04_index.cfm 2004 Spending Review]
*[https://www.gov.uk/government/topical-events/autumn-statement-and-spending-review-2015 Spending Review and Autumn Statement 2015 (Archived)]
{{United Kingdom budget}}


[[Category:Government spending]]
[[Category:Government spending]]

Revision as of 09:21, 23 October 2019

luke is a big no follow EXTRACTZ on yt hello richard

Spending Reviews typically focus upon one or several aspects of public spending while Comprehensive Spending Reviews focus upon each government department's spending requirements from a zero base (i.e. without reference to past plans or, initially, current expenditure). The latter are named after the year in which they are announced – thus CSR07 (completed in October 2007) applies to financial years 2008–2011.

Other developed countries have similar review processes, e.g. Canada, New Zealand, The Netherlands,[1] Italy, Ireland,[2] and France. France conducted its first comprehensive spending review (called in French "la Revue Générale des Politiques Publiques") in 2008. The Netherlands have been carrying out spending reviews since 1981.

2007 Comprehensive Spending Review

The UK's 2007 Comprehensive Spending Review included three significant changes. The first was that it represented the first test of the capacity of the Spending Review process to plan and deliver a discretionary fiscal consolidation in the UK. The previous four Spending Reviews took place during a period of steady public growth in the economy from 37% in 1999–00 to 42% by 2007–08. As both the UK's then fiscal rules (the Golden rule and the sustainable investment rule) began to bite[vague][citation needed], the UK government desired to halve the real rate of growth in public spending from 4% per annum over the last decade to 2% per annum over the next three years – a 0.5% below than the trend rate of growth of the economy. A second noteworthy development in the 2007 CSR was a marked extension in the certainty that the UK system now provides to public sector managers about their future budgets. Finally, CSR07 saw the UK's public service 110 largely departmental-based Public Service Agreements consolidated into 30 inter-departmental agreements.

2010 Spending Review

A spending review for the years 2011/12 through to 2014/15 was announced by the coalition government. This review was driven by a desire to reduce government spending in order to cut the budget deficit.[3]

Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne announced the details of the spending review on 20 October 2010.[4] The cuts have been described as the biggest since World War II.[5] The review would lead to an £81 billion cut in public spending in the remaining 4 years of the parliament, with average departmental cuts of 19%. In addition major changes in welfare were announced including £7 billion of extra welfare cuts, changes to incapacity benefit, housing benefit and tax credits and a rise in the state pension age to 66 from 2020.[5] Public sector employees will face a £3.5 billion increase in public pension contributions.

The Home Office faced cuts of 25%,[6] local councils would face a yearly 7% cut in funding from central government each year until 2014.[6] The Ministry of Defence faced cuts of around 8%. In addition many other public sector bodies had cuts to their funding.[6] Although not part of government the BBC had its licence fee frozen for 6 years and will take on the funding of the BBC World Service, BBC Monitoring and S4C.[6] The Office for Budget Responsibility predicts that the spending review will lead to a loss of about 490,000 public sector jobs by 2015.[6] The NHS will see a 0.4% increase in spending in real terms over the following 4 years.[6]

A£200 million payment was announced to compensate savers in the collapsed savings society Presbyterian Mutual.[7]

A report published in late 2013 by Trust for London and the London School of Economics and Political Science estimated that local government budgets in London had taken a 33% real terms cut in central government funding for local government between 2009/10 and 2013/14.[8]

See also

References

  1. ^ "OECD journal, SPENDING REVIEWS".
  2. ^ "– Comprehensive Expenditure Report 2012 – 2014". www.per.gov.ie.
  3. ^ An introduction to Spending Review HM Treasury website in the UK Government Web Archive. Retrieved 26 August 2014
  4. ^ "Spending Review: Reaction to Osborne statement". BBC News. 20 October 2010. Retrieved 9 March 2013.
  5. ^ a b "Spending Review 2010". BBC News. 20 October 2010. Retrieved 21 October 2010.
  6. ^ a b c d e f "Spending review 2010:key points at a glance". Guardian. London. 20 October 2010. Retrieved 21 October 2010.
  7. ^ £200m pledged for collapsed N Irish mutual. Retrieved 9 March 2013
  8. ^ "Hard Times, New Directions, The Impact of the Local Government Spending Cuts in London". trustforlondon.org.uk.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Spending_Review&oldid=922627418"