Jump to content

Rollovers as business start-ups: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Lowercase
m MOS:HEADINGS and other cleanup
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Rollovers as business start-ups''' ('''ROBS''') are arrangements in which current or prospective business owners use their [[401(k)]], IRA or other retirement funds to pay for new business start-up costs, for business acquisition costs or to refinance an existing business. ROBS is an acronym from the [[United States]] [[Internal Revenue Service]] for the IRS ROBS Rollovers as Business Start-Ups Compliance Project.<ref name=":0">{{cite web|title=2008 IRS ROBS Memorandum|url=https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-tege/robs_guidelines.pdf|publisher=irs.gov|accessdate=15 November 2013}}</ref>
'''Rollovers as business start-ups''' ('''ROBS''') are arrangements in which current or prospective business owners use their [[401(k)]], IRA or other retirement funds to pay for new business start-up costs, for business acquisition costs or to refinance an existing business. ROBS is an acronym from the [[United States]] [[Internal Revenue Service]] for the IRS ROBS Rollovers as Business Start-Ups Compliance Project (ROBS Project).<ref name=":0">{{cite web|title=2008 IRS ROBS Memorandum|url=https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-tege/robs_guidelines.pdf|publisher=irs.gov|accessdate=15 November 2013}}</ref>


==Background==
==Background==
Line 9: Line 9:
In many cases, the broker will apply to IRS for a favorable determination letter (DL) as a way to assure their clients that IRS approves the ROBS arrangement. The IRS issues a DL based on the plan’s terms meeting Internal Revenue Code requirements. DLs do not give plan sponsors protection from incorrectly applying the plan’s terms or from operating the plan in a discriminatory manner. When a plan sponsor administers a plan in a way that results in prohibited discrimination or engages in prohibited transactions, it can result in plan disqualification and adverse tax consequences to the plan’s sponsor and its participants. Accordingly, promoters who emphasize or "promote" based on a favorable determination letter are, at a minimum, engaging in deceptive trade practices.<ref name=":0" />
In many cases, the broker will apply to IRS for a favorable determination letter (DL) as a way to assure their clients that IRS approves the ROBS arrangement. The IRS issues a DL based on the plan’s terms meeting Internal Revenue Code requirements. DLs do not give plan sponsors protection from incorrectly applying the plan’s terms or from operating the plan in a discriminatory manner. When a plan sponsor administers a plan in a way that results in prohibited discrimination or engages in prohibited transactions, it can result in plan disqualification and adverse tax consequences to the plan’s sponsor and its participants. Accordingly, promoters who emphasize or "promote" based on a favorable determination letter are, at a minimum, engaging in deceptive trade practices.<ref name=":0" />


== ROBS Project Findings ==
==ROBS Project findings==
===New business failures===
'''New Business Failures'''


Preliminary results from the ROBS Project indicate that, although there were a few success stories, most ROBS businesses either failed or were on the road to failure with high rates of bankruptcy (business and personal), liens (business and personal), and corporate dissolutions by individual Secretaries of State. Some of the individuals who started ROBS plans lost not only the retirement assets they accumulated over many years, but also their dream of owning a business. As a result, much of the retirement savings invested in their unsuccessful ROBS plan was depleted or ‘lost,’ in many cases even before they had begun to offer their product or service to the public.<ref name=":0" />
Preliminary results from the ROBS Project indicate that, although there were a few success stories, most ROBS businesses either failed or were on the road to failure with high rates of bankruptcy (business and personal), liens (business and personal), and corporate dissolutions by individual Secretaries of State. Some of the individuals who started ROBS plans lost not only the retirement assets they accumulated over many years, but also their dream of owning a business. As a result, much of the retirement savings invested in their unsuccessful ROBS plan was depleted or ‘lost,’ in many cases even before they had begun to offer their product or service to the public.<ref name=":0" />


'''Specific Problems with ROBS'''
===Specific problems with ROBS===


Some other areas the ROBS plan could run into trouble:<ref name=":0" />
Some other areas the ROBS plan could run into trouble:<ref name=":0" />

Revision as of 22:09, 27 October 2019

Rollovers as business start-ups (ROBS) are arrangements in which current or prospective business owners use their 401(k), IRA or other retirement funds to pay for new business start-up costs, for business acquisition costs or to refinance an existing business. ROBS is an acronym from the United States Internal Revenue Service for the IRS ROBS Rollovers as Business Start-Ups Compliance Project (ROBS Project).[1]

Background

ROBS plans, while not considered an abusive tax avoidance transaction, are, according to the IRS, "questionable"[2] because they may solely benefit one individual – the individual who rolls over his or her existing retirement 401k withdrawal funds to the ROBS plan in a tax-free transaction. In most cases, since the IRS pronouncement concerning this potentially discriminatory approach, ROBS plans have been inclusive of all participants and provide broad-based participation for all employees. The ROBS plan then uses the rollover assets to purchase the stock of the new business. A C corporation must be set up in order to roll the 401(k) withdrawal.[1]

Promoters, such as a Roth IRA broker of a self-directed IRA LLC, or small business financing, aggressively market IRS ROBS arrangements to prospective entrepreneurs and business owners for funding for a business as small business financing. In the case of most ROBS facilitators, there is a very close relationship between the promoter/facilitator and the franchise industry, seeking to sell and promote business "opportunities" and seeking funding sources for these sales and promotions. Most ROBS "promoters" and facilitators pay substantial referral fees to the franchise brokers who refer business to the promoters. Rarely are these fees disclosed to the entrepreneur. Fees charged by most "promoters," consequently, are in excess of the fees that would be charged by attorneys and accountants for the same services who are prohibited from paying referral fees. Some companies offering ROBS plans do not pay referral fees to brokers, and charge lower fees as a result. There remains a substantial question whether such referral fees are illegal under ERISA and the U.S. Criminal Code: Offer, Acceptance, or Solicitation to Influence Operations of Employee Benefit Plan (18 U.S.C. Section 1954).[1]

In many cases, the broker will apply to IRS for a favorable determination letter (DL) as a way to assure their clients that IRS approves the ROBS arrangement. The IRS issues a DL based on the plan’s terms meeting Internal Revenue Code requirements. DLs do not give plan sponsors protection from incorrectly applying the plan’s terms or from operating the plan in a discriminatory manner. When a plan sponsor administers a plan in a way that results in prohibited discrimination or engages in prohibited transactions, it can result in plan disqualification and adverse tax consequences to the plan’s sponsor and its participants. Accordingly, promoters who emphasize or "promote" based on a favorable determination letter are, at a minimum, engaging in deceptive trade practices.[1]

ROBS Project findings

New business failures

Preliminary results from the ROBS Project indicate that, although there were a few success stories, most ROBS businesses either failed or were on the road to failure with high rates of bankruptcy (business and personal), liens (business and personal), and corporate dissolutions by individual Secretaries of State. Some of the individuals who started ROBS plans lost not only the retirement assets they accumulated over many years, but also their dream of owning a business. As a result, much of the retirement savings invested in their unsuccessful ROBS plan was depleted or ‘lost,’ in many cases even before they had begun to offer their product or service to the public.[1]

Specific problems with ROBS

Some other areas the ROBS plan could run into trouble:[1]

  • After the ROBS plan sponsor purchases the new company’s employer stock with the rollover funds, the sponsor amends the plan to prevent other participants from purchasing stock. Since the 2008 announcement from the IRS such amendments are rare.
  • If the sponsor amends the plan to prevent other employees from participating after the DL is issued, this may violate the Code qualification requirements. These types of amendments tend to result in problems with coverage, discrimination and potentially result in violations of benefits, rights and features requirements.
  • Promoter fees
  • Valuation of assets
  • Failure to issue a Form 1099-R, Distributions From Pensions, Annuities, Retirement or Profit-Sharing Plans, IRAs, Insurance Contracts, etc., when the assets are rolled over into the ROBS plan

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c d e f "2008 IRS ROBS Memorandum" (PDF). irs.gov. Retrieved 15 November 2013.
  2. ^ https://www.irs.gov/Retirement-Plans/Employee-Plans-Compliance-Unit-%28EPCU%29---Completed-Projects---Project-with-Summary-Reports-%E2%80%93-Rollovers-as-Business-Start-Ups-%28ROBS%29