Talk:Chrysomya putoria: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 00:56, 6 November 2019

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 August 2019 and 4 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mmhua (article contribs).

Insects Unassessed Low‑importance

	Insects portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Insects, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of insects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InsectsWikipedia:WikiProject InsectsTemplate:WikiProject InsectsInsects
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Diptera Unassessed

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Diptera, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of flies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DipteraWikipedia:WikiProject DipteraTemplate:WikiProject DipteraDiptera
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 09:36, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

Member of genus Chrysomya on a leaf

... that Chrysomya putoria and other flies that feed on decomposing flesh are used as important tools in forensic entomology to establish the post-mortem interval? Source: Amorim and Ribeiro. (2001)
- ALT1:... that Chrysomya putoria larvae can potentially be used in maggot therapy by removing dead tissue in wounds to promote the growth of new tissue? Source: Ferraz et al. (2014)
- ALT2:... that the synanthropy of Chrysomya putoria may contribute to a major health impact on people in developing countries? Source: Baumgartner and Greenberg. (1984)

5x expanded by Mmhua (talk). Self-nominated at 17:02, 1 November 2019 (UTC).[reply]

GTG for main hook & ALT 1. A delightful read! Expanded & long enough. Neutral well-written & referenced. Main hook & ALT 1 check out (though the later refs support the main hook better than that given). I can only read the abstract for ALT2, which doesn't support the hook, with no mention of "major health impact", but the other two are better hooks imo anyway. Earwig finds nothing. Pic ok to use - though a cropped version might be better. Johnbod (talk) 16:19, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your thorough review! I have taken your suggestion into account and uploaded a cropped version of the image. Please let me know if there is anything else I need to do. Thanks again! --Mmhua (talk) 17:23, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Behavioral Ecology Peer Review

Margaret, this is a really good article! There is tons of information, everything is well cited, and well written. There were a couple things I think were still confusing, especially for a general audience. When describing larva, you talk about spiracles and spiracular openings. That description is confusing. I added a Wiki link to a page on spiracles, so that should be helpful to a general audience, but I think the language needs clarification. It also would be great if you described what a frons is-I struggled to find it on the Wiki page linked, but there isn't one specific to frons. Also there's no Wiki page for synanthropy, which seems an important adjective for this fly, so definitely explaining that term would be helpful to a general audience. You mention that these flies have parasitic relationships with bacteria, so I think it would be cool if you could expand that and include a section on their microbiome or if they have an mutalistic relationships. Also I know most blow flies have oviposition, so including a section on parental care and seeing if they also oviposit would be good!Montana.sievert (talk) 00:56, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 {{Did you know nominations/chrysomya putoria}}
+== Behavioral Ecology Peer Review ==
+Margaret, this is a really good article! There is tons of information, everything is well cited, and well written. There were a couple things I think were still confusing, especially for a general audience. When describing larva, you talk about spiracles and spiracular openings. That description is confusing. I added a Wiki link to a page on spiracles, so that should be helpful to a general audience, but I think the language needs clarification. It also would be great if you described what a frons is-I struggled to find it on the Wiki page linked, but there isn't one specific to frons. Also there's no Wiki page for synanthropy, which seems an important adjective for this fly, so definitely explaining that term would be helpful to a general audience. You mention that these flies have parasitic relationships with bacteria, so I think it would be cool if you could expand that and include a section on their microbiome or if they have an mutalistic relationships. Also I know most blow flies have oviposition, so including a section on parental care and seeing if they also oviposit would be good![[User:Montana.sievert|Montana.sievert]] ([[User talk:Montana.sievert|talk]]) 00:56, 6 November 2019 (UTC)