Jump to content

User:Futuresay22: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 27: Line 27:
I actually have two well-defined ways to create articles: the first is to wait for the release of the recording and take stock on its "context", i.e if multiple reliable sources cover it, or if it ranked in a significant number of charts in different countries, all this in order to respect [[WP:MUSIC]].
I actually have two well-defined ways to create articles: the first is to wait for the release of the recording and take stock on its "context", i.e if multiple reliable sources cover it, or if it ranked in a significant number of charts in different countries, all this in order to respect [[WP:MUSIC]].


My second way is to create the article as soon as the artist in question announced the release date on his social media. But I have to be sure, depending on the artists listed, the fans expectations, the musical context etc. that the song/album will be covered later by multiple reliable sources or multiple charts in different countries (sometimes difficult to predict, I know). In this case, I create a [[WP:Stub|stub]] that I expand as the reliable publications write on the subject, for example a few days before or after the release. (I do not like to leave the articles in the stub-class too much; when possible, I try to approach the start-class by expanding with reliable sources.) And finally, if this is not the case (in short, if I was mistaken, in fact), I don't hesitate to redirect it because it means it fails WP:MUSIC.
My second way is to create the article as soon as the artist in question announced the release date on his social media. But I have to be sure, depending on the artists listed, the fans expectations, the musical context etc. that the song/album will be covered later by multiple reliable sources or multiple charts in different countries (sometimes difficult to predict, I know). In this case, I create a [[WP:Stub|stub]] that I expand as the reliable publications write on the subject, for example a few days before or after the release. (I don't like to leave the articles in the stub-class too much; when possible, I try to approach the start-class by expanding with reliable sources.) And finally, if this is not the case (in short, if I was mistaken, in fact), I don't hesitate to redirect it because it means it fails WP:MUSIC.


Regarding the sources that I use in my articles, I have now learned (which was not the case for my first edits) not to use blogs that attempt to portray themselves as quality websites, by their presentation or their arguments. These "blogs" are often written by simple music lovers who only give their point of view instead of providing a professional and objective work on the song or the album.
Regarding the sources that I use in my articles, I have now learned (which was not the case for my first edits) not to use blogs that attempt to portray themselves as quality websites, by their presentation or their arguments. These "blogs" are often written by simple music lovers who only give their point of view instead of providing a professional and objective work on the song or the album.

Revision as of 13:43, 6 November 2019

This contributor to Wikipedia is male.
17This user is 17 years old.
This user lives in France.
This user edited under a previous user name of Futuresay but he forgot the password of this account.
This user enjoys electronic music.
This user tries to do the right thing. If they make a mistake, please let them know.

I'm Futuresay22 and I'm here since 12 March 2019 (since August 2018 under the account Futuresay but I've forgotten its password). However, I'm truly active since 26 August 2019.

What I do

I focus mainly on creating articles about electronic songs and albums from artists that I enjoy listening, whether recent or not.

I actually have two well-defined ways to create articles: the first is to wait for the release of the recording and take stock on its "context", i.e if multiple reliable sources cover it, or if it ranked in a significant number of charts in different countries, all this in order to respect WP:MUSIC.

My second way is to create the article as soon as the artist in question announced the release date on his social media. But I have to be sure, depending on the artists listed, the fans expectations, the musical context etc. that the song/album will be covered later by multiple reliable sources or multiple charts in different countries (sometimes difficult to predict, I know). In this case, I create a stub that I expand as the reliable publications write on the subject, for example a few days before or after the release. (I don't like to leave the articles in the stub-class too much; when possible, I try to approach the start-class by expanding with reliable sources.) And finally, if this is not the case (in short, if I was mistaken, in fact), I don't hesitate to redirect it because it means it fails WP:MUSIC.

Regarding the sources that I use in my articles, I have now learned (which was not the case for my first edits) not to use blogs that attempt to portray themselves as quality websites, by their presentation or their arguments. These "blogs" are often written by simple music lovers who only give their point of view instead of providing a professional and objective work on the song or the album.

Below are exhaustive lists of articles I created and reconstructed, in chronological order according to the date of creation or restructuring.


What I did
Articles I
created
Articles I
reconstructed
Wild Wild Son (Armin van Buuren song)

Notes
1. Forever (Martin Garrix and Matisse & Sadko song): Created under the name of Futuresay.
2. Rather Be Alone (Robin Schulz, Nick Martin and Sam Martin song): I marked this article as unnotable because it didn't "receive a significant coverage of multiple reliable sources" per WP:NSONGS.
3. Same thing for Jump (David Guetta and Glowinthedark song): I tagged it as unnotable, which led me to stop creating articles for little covered topics.