Talk:College health

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jenezra, Gurshawnstuteja, Wangela323, Kcouch1 (article contribs). This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: ARiggins. This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Nschliphack (article contribs). This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 September 2019 and 13 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Xushar, Kimchow, ChristyCrCK, Ananajafi (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Melaniegzarate, Dakoffeditor, HannaYakubi.

Fair use rationale for Image:Drink.jpg

Image:Drink.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 14:12, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Candy.jpg

Image:Candy.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 16:28, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Page move request

Most Wikipedia pages use sentence casing instead of title casing. Can someone move this page to College health instead of College Health? I thought originally that College Health was going to turn out to be a magazine or a business instead of a general topic. WhatamIdoing (talk) 21:00, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on College health. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090429030415/http://www.collegehealthinfo.com/ to http://www.collegehealthinfo.com/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061123190849/http://www.heldref.org/jach.php to http://www.heldref.org/jach.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:00, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Review

Being a college student myself this article was very informative. I liked how the different aspects of the topic provided any — Preceding unsigned comment added by ARiggins (talk • contribs) 20:54, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Revamping Article

Hey folks!

We're a group of four undergraduate students from McMaster University in Canada. We plan to overhaul this article as a part of a Wikipedia class project focusing on health information. We believe that this article requires significant changes to be made due to the following weaknesses:

The article as a whole is ‘unencylopedic’: it lacks a comprehensive structure, deviates off topic and does not adequately cover the realm of college health in its entirety.

• In particular, there is an excess focus on eating disorders and a complete disregard for other mental health issues such as depression and anxiety, among others.

The article does not provide adequate citations. Citations that are provided are often improperly formatted or outdated.

• For instance, the article cites a study from 1988 when giving a statistic about the ratio of college health staff per 10,000 students. We intend to find a study that is more up-to-date.

The article cites a news article rather than a primary research article to indicate the prevalence of marijuana use among college students. The article is written with poor grammar and utilizes problematic terminology.

• For instance, the article blatantly claims that, “Eating junk food lacks nutrition and proteins. Eventually those calories in the products will build up into fats.” These simplistic claims lack scientific validity and appropriate citations.

The article makes generalized, often subjective statements that do not adequately represent the vast experiences of the student population.

• With regards to weight gain, the article makes an unfounded claim that, “Beginning freshmen enter a new phase that affects the way they eat. They are unaware of their nutrition and they only want something from what they see.”

The article does not adopt a strengths-based approach, as it does not explicitly mention any mental health and wellness services available for college students. Rather, the tone adopted is more derogatory and pejorative.

The article deals primarily with the United States, and does not represent a worldwide view of the subject.

We would specifically like to expand the structure of the article by improving on existing information and adding new subheadings relevant to college health. Our goals with this article include:

Refine the Article’s Focus: provide a more informative break-down of the topic and create a cohesive article that prioritizes the most important issues for those seeking out the information.

Address Article Impartiality: adopt a more objective writing style and reduce the personal biases and stereotypical undertones in the paper; eliminate the possibility of influencing the reader with unreliable information.

Find Credible Sources of Information: incorporate more credible research findings and quantitative data pertaining to mental health and substance use.

Make the Article More Current: incorporate present-day concepts pertaining to adolescents and young adults; include information on the lack of employment opportunities, the use of dating sites/applications, the use of vaping, and the negative stereotypes surrounding youth.

Make the Article More Universal: reconstruct the article so that it offers a worldwide representation of college health, including studies that were conducted in a broader range of geographical locations.

These changes will be occurring over the next five weeks in the hopes of completely overhauling the article. We look forward to hearing any feedback from the Wikipedia community.

Manlymanstan (talk) 00:26, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Mental Health

Hi everyone!

We are a group of four pharmacy school students from UCSF in California. For our Health Policy course, we have chosen to edit this article, focusing on the mental health section. We hope to add and expand on the topics of depression, anxiety, ADHD, sleep disorders, and suicide. For each topic, we will discuss the definition, potential prevalence on college campuses, non-pharmacological, and pharmacological treatments. In addition, we want to re-organize the “Adderall” section to fall under the broader “Mental Health” section in order to educate the general public on potential treatments and abused medications on college campuses. Furthermore we will discuss student accommodations (what kind of accommodations people receive, what they need to do to get them, etc.). Xushar (talk) 07:12, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

Changing Title of Article

Hello!

We are a group of undergraduate students from McMaster University. We were planning on changing the title of this Wiki article to "Post-Secondary Health" to clarify the article's focus on all forms of tertiary education. Any feedback is welcome and we look forward to hearing users' suggestions on this matter. Mckinlas (talk) 01:29, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

CP133 2019 Group 4 Peer Reviews (of Group 5 Edits)

HANNA The edits made by Group 5 have done an excellent job at improving this article. In particular, the group increased the amount of disorders classified under the “Mental Health” section and included statistics justifying why these disorders are pertinent to college healthcare. The addition of a much more in-depth ADHD section, again with statistics, helps to further better describe the array of health issues faced by college students. There are citations for all major claims, and the citations are from reputable sources. Overall, the group meets their stated goal: to expand on the Mental Health section by adding cited information regarding prevalence and treatment

The submitted edits are clearly a neutral point of view. A majority of the changes are statistics presented in a scientific and understandable manner, without subjective/personal qualifiers. Other changes that explain presentation of disease are given in a factual manner, again without subjective qualifiers. 128.218.43.229 (talk) 00:29, 7 November 2019 (UTC)Hanna

CHRISTINE H. Group 5 made substantial improvements and contributions thus far to the “College Health Article”. Numerous sources were added and updated, and more context on several college health topics were added. For example, more information was added to the ADHD section highlighting the issue of stimulant misuse and its prevalence in colleges. There were also substantial sections added highlighting the prevalance of Major Depressive Disorder and Anxiety Disorders in college populations, and subsequent consequences on overall college student health. Important statistics and sources were also added about students suffering from such disorders due to prevalance of sexual assault on campus. Group 5 stated that they hoped to include and expand on topics such as depression, anxiety, ADHD, sleep disorders, and suicide in college health as well as discussing definitions, potential campus prevalance, and non-pharmacological/pharmacological treatments, which I believe they have effectively achieved. ChuynhCP133 (talk) 00:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC) Christine Huynh ChuynhCP133 (talk) 00:34, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

The points that Group 5 added are indeed verifiable with cited secondary sources. These sources are also freely available for readers to check information. For example, in the ADHD section there was a citation added from the American College Health Association which is a secondary resource that includes freely available information. ChuynhCP133 (talk) 00:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC) Christine Huynh ChuynhCP133 (talk) 00:34, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

DANIELLE Yes, Group 5 formatted their edits in consonance with Wikipedia’s manual of style. Every statement made cited a reliable source to journal articles or accredited institutions like NAMI. I will say that even though this group used reputable sources they did rely heavily on one or two sources, which may lead to an unbalanced or biased article. The language used in Group 5’s edits remains neutral and for the most part, the structure is easy to follow along with. Dakoffeditor (talk) 00:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)Danielle

MELANIE I believe the group’s edits regarding ADHD, anxiety, depression, and sleep orders in relation to college health does improve the article under the “Guiding Framework.” Previously, the topic of mental health in college students was barely touched upon despite being so prevalent on college campuses. Since mental health can encompass many different disease states, I think the addition of the most prevalent mental health disease states in college students are important. All group members did a good job in explaining each mental illness and how they relate to college students with clear citations for piece of each information.

I think the group successfully achieved its goals for improvement because they expanded on the topic of mental health and specified the most prevalent disease states affecting college students in particular. Each group member successfully provided an overview of each mental health disorder and supported their edits with clear citations from primary literature.

There is no clear evidence of plagiarism or copyright violations in the groups’ edits thus far. When I crosschecked the sources of sentence, I could see that each group member successfully reworded the main topics in their own words. In addition, they hyperlinked other Wikipedia articles on specific words in the case that other views would like to have more context on related topics.Melaniegzarate (talk) 00:39, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Yes, the group’s edits substantially improved the article as described in the Wikipedia peer review “Guiding framework.” They added in highly relevant sections on mental health and depression among college students with citations to support their statements. They did a nice job of integrating a variety of sources into their article and steered away from relying heavily on one source. They kept content neutral and achieved their goal of expanding upon the mental health section of the article. If I could make one recommendation, it would be to stay mindful of plagiarism. Dakoffeditor (talk) 00:53, 7 November 2019 (UTC)Danielle

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.218.43.229 (talk) 00:16, 7 November 2019 (UTC)