User talk:Gdo01

This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 7 days are automatically archived to User talk:Gdo01/Archive/Archive 01. Sections without timestamps are not archived.

I make mistakes on RC patrol. (Report one)

False Accusation

You said I added nonsense to the page on Cholera. The first time I visited that page was AFTER you sent me that message. Either someone's been hacking my computer, or you got the wrong IP address. What gives???

Vandalism

Thank you for experimenting with the page Nonoffensive on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. -Nonoffensive 18:45, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Put in by a vandal. Gdo01 19:08, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

What Nonoffensive 19:08, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

VANDALISM ACCUSATION

you sent me a message that i was commiting vandalism....please varify your accusation...i dont recall making ANY recent changes to articles....please tell me what i have vandalized.....please contact........thanx —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.199.142.78 (talk • contribs) .

Noriega

Wikipedia in Spanish has sources documenting Noriega was found innocent of drug trafficking, and imprisoned as war prisoner (of the imperial army of the USA).—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 200.91.136.129 (talk • contribs) .

Reba

Can I ask why you have reverted my edit on page Reba? There was no reason for that edit to be removed as that word describes Reba —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.31.100.211 (talk • contribs) .

Thank you Gdo01 -—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.31.100.211 (talk • contribs) .

Sorry about the Colbert thing

My apologies. I just love Colbert. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rytagg (talk • contribs) .

Big Brother Pete Bennett

Please justify your reversion of my edit which was both verifiable and noteworthy leaky_caldron 20:09, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

Alfredo

Sorry

Hi Geraldo Im Alfredo and I wrote Kevin Smith is a fat ass on the magnolia article. Thanks for deleting it and Im sorry for writing. And by the way you found it 2 minutes after I wrote it.You are good.

Challange

Hi Geraldo I think what you do is great and I challange you to delete the things Im about to do to some articles. Every article that I vandalise would have your name Geraldo. It's just for fun. So let's start NOW. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Alfredosolis (talk • contribs) .

Geraldo forget the contest thing I was blocked.Im sorry. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Alfredosolis (talk • contribs) 07:29, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Block Alfredo!

Interesting that Alfredo would show up on your user page. Of the very few articles I watch, he keeps vandalizing four of them--he repeatedly adds and re-adds images with no copyright information. On the Chas Tenenbaum and Royal Tenenbaum pages, for instance, he has now re-added the same images three times after they've been removed by OrphanBot. --Miss Dark 03:51, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Sceptile and leaky_caldron

HOW DARE YOU! Deleting what I added about that losser PS. please replie to sceptile -posted at 17:14 EST on July 30, 2006 by SceptileSceptile

I made the edit. Whoever left the above did not and is probably trying to cause mischief leaky_caldron 21:18, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

I was about to delete the Halo 2 vandalism on Games Considered the Worst Ever Page, but I saw you already did that. Thank you for trying to help maintain the integrity of the article. guitarhero777777 02:54, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

anonymous editer

hello Gdo01, i was only warning that anoymous editer to stop reverting that article. i think that halo 2 is a GREAT game and i do not find it verry funny at all. thats all. many thanks Touth 02:59, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

your welcome! many thanks my friend. happy editing Touth 03:06, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

vandalism

hey the person from this ip 24.60.89.199, tried to add some non sens to the cosmo and wanda article. I noticed you told them before thought i'd run it by you. ChicanoJ 04:35, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Gdo01! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Computerjoe's talk 15:24, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Gdo01! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Computerjoe's talk 15:24, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Hi I didn't do it. when i clicked toefl save changes it said the article conflicted with something else and half the content disappered. So I didn't do it. i just added a external link to the toefl section—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 59.92.179.13 (talk • contribs) .

the saint:

no shit or joking thats is the true story about why the saint choose a volvo p1800 read more here: http://www.btinternet.com/~therogermooreyears/Volvop1800.htm so be open minded you might even learn something from us swedes ( but i doubt it..)... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.231.8.33 (talk • contribs) .

Mistaken vandalism

I am not the original owner of this IP address, my ISP just assigns them randomly. I have checked the vandalism warning from False Prophet, which applies to the former owner of this IP address. According to Wikipedia's definition of vandalism: "Vandalism is any addition, deletion, or change to content, made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of the encyclopedia.", the modifications by the former owner of the IP address were actually not vandalism since they did not compromise the integrity of the encyclopedia. I do not believe the changes to be much of importance, but I do believe it was not vandalism. I do not know if it is possible to do so, but since I'm the new owner of the IP, I therefore request the removal of that warning. Why not asking False Prophet? The reason is simple: he is in vacation and you have posted on my user talk.

24.37.160.221 05:35, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Bad link in your User talk page

The "Report one" link at the top of your talk page seems not to be a valid link. 24.37.160.221 05:58, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

-edit: The link must be changed from http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/wiki.phtml?title=User_talk:Gdo01&action=edit§ion=new to http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gdo01&action=edit&section=new 24.37.160.221 06:02, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Fixed. Thank you.--Gdo01 06:03, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Looks like you were faster than me on typing that one. =P Have a nice day!--24.37.160.221 06:04, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

FLCL

As a userbox fan of FLCL, would you be willing to vote for its nomination at Wikipedia's Article Improvement Drive? If elected, it will be the subject of a week-long overhaul, in an attempt to pass in to Featured Article status! Thanks, Litefantastic 17:21, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Edit was not vandalism.

It was my belief that articles were supposed to be politically neutral. Claiming that Bush was "against civil liberties" is certainly not neutral. Nor is it a fact or piece of truthful information in any way. The worst part of all is the claim is not made in the context of someone’s beliefs, it is stated as fact. If even it were to read "some people believed..." or something along those lines. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 12.146.190.92 (talk • contribs) .

Bush article

I would say that voting against one bill simply because it is named the "Civil Rights" bill does not mean that you are "against civil rights". That statement is a broad generalization which I'm sure Bush himself would disagree with. I fail to see why the prayer in schools would have to go, it is indeed fact that he supported prayer in schools, he has said so himself so that is very clear.

To summarize I believe the article should AT THE LEAST be changed to mention that he voted against the civil rights bill rather than a generalization that makes it appear as if he was against ALL civil rights. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 12.146.190.92 (talk • contribs) .

Bleach Arc names

Do what you like. I'm currently going through the article history to figure out exactly who it was that invented those arc names in the first place. --tjstrf 22:25, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

OK, as it turns out, it was Ynhockey. [1] I agree with the Soul Society arc name, but think the early story would best be called that: Early story or beginning, or something similar. --tjstrf 22:32, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism on Taepodong-1

To my knowledge, I have not added anything to the Taepodong-1 page, let alone even viewed it. What happened?--64.12.122.195 21:02, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Wikiflaws:

I would like to interview you for an article. Would you accept? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.65.75.224 (talk • contribs) .

IP address 72.181.73.209 has recently made vandalism to the Brownsville, Texas website (again, I removed it), and to the University of Texas at Brownsville website by calling the president "Tia Caca" (removed by me, as well).

I am not sure who I should report this to, bit i figure if I do it to you, it might be just as efficient. --Mcamargo 15:25, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Gabriel

Hello:)

I had recently edited parts of Wikepedia on Gabriel, and you said it was vandalism. One of the edits I had made was on the Occult understanding of Gabriel. I put the Color "Purple" as Gabriel's color in addition to blue,and his rulership over the Kabbalistic Sephira of Yesod. All these attributions that I added are accurate. So your reversions are WRONG. Your email message to me accusing me of being a Vandal was very RUDE to say the least. I am a Kabbalist/Occultist and I have worked with Gabriel before. To check my attributions, read Dion Fortune's "The Mystical Qabala". In the future, do your research before accusing others of Vandalism. Also remember that anyone can edit Wikepedia, if it is a valid edit. So stop being a member of the Thought-Police. And please try NOT to be rude in the future, as you will receive the same treatment.

Blessings, --A Very pissed-off Kabbalist —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 207.126.223.29 (talk • contribs) .

Polygariffic!

Do you have a problem with Polygamy? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.135.161.74 (talk • contribs) .

Amir Peretz

For your info, 67.190.106.134 put the same nonsense into the above article three times after you reverted it, and Tawkerbot2 reverted it each time. Those last three times were after you posted the warning on his/her talk page. I am sure there is a place to report this activity, but I do not know where. 6SJ7 17:51, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Peter Kay article

How did that happen, I reverted the article as it had been vandalised and your are the person listed in History as editing it?

Strange, unless we both did the rv at the same time perhaps? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Pjb007 (talk • contribs) .

Thanks

Thanks for reverting vandalism to my talk page, regards, --Ali K 06:04, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

World Wide fund thing

Hey man, I see you sent me an PM, I know I'm vandilising, but, If you got the the Urban Dictionary site, some ppl are bashing there about WWF. Just Type WWF in the box, and you'll see what I mean --from User:Dekabreak

Edit: Sorry, my apologies, I just like wrestling, don't want to be mean or so. I just hate it when WWE changed. So sorry won't happen. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dekabreak (talk • contribs) .

Revert of edits to The Colbert Report recurring elements

The revert you made to The Colbert Report recurring elements was clearly not a reversion of vandalism. While the anon contributions may not be worthy of including in the article, they certainly do not meet the criteria for Vandalism.–RHolton≡– 10:55, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

V for Vendetta (film)

Thanks for correcting the pt-interwiki link. I'm running a Interwiki BOT and always have problems with these wrong links. --Meisam.fa 19:40, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Stephen Colbert

• Colbert first introduced the Called Out board on 8/14/2006, by placing John Steward on it to force an appology to Geraldo.

This is verifiable factual information. Look it up on Comedy Central or watch his show and you might know. This is a trivia fact not vandalism. Also by placing the underline on the H in John that is notating that it is mispelled.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 132.178.204.178 (talk • contribs) .

Barrington Nova Scotia Possible Vandalism

Possible Vandalism on Barrington, Nova Scotia that you reversed was revandalize by user:89.213.1.100 on August 3,2006 .I reverted the edit .--Bill 23:11, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

WP:AWB

Hi Gdo01, just reminding you of an AWB rule:

• Avoid making insignificant minor edits such as only adding or removing some white space, moving a stub tag, converting some HTML to Unicode, removing underscores from links (unless they are bad links), or something equally trivial. This is because it wastes resources and clogs up watch lists.

See you around! —Mets501 (talk) 15:01, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Colbert Bridge Incident

Hi Gd001, beside appreciating your heroic efforts making Wikipedia a better place, please consider that FACTS are not to be mixed with vandalism. Fact is that Colbert named a national hero of a foreign nation as "asshole" in his show (youtube it if you doubt) and affected members of a nation could hardly tolerate this. Maybe it is fun for Americans but not for Hungarians. The bridge name voting story shall contain this FACT too, not only the poll results. If a comedian makes fun of something, (s(he shall take all the responsibility as well. Best would be OMIT the whole name voting issue from the personal part because it is insignificant for Colbert's life but deeply offensing for national emotions of a EU country.

Also note that there are repeated tips and urges for voting, cheating or hacking the official vote page. Does it match Wikipedia rules? Don't think so.

Dear Gdo, still presuming your measures are for the overall benefit of the Wiki community and not merely on behalf of Colbert himself, let me point out that your message remarks are somewhat odd. Hope you do not mind.

First of all, Colbert's lack of knowledge is his very own problem and being stupid is seldom an excuse -- this is not a case. FACT it is that according to Hungarian regulation, things can be named after only dead people. If one knew it, never would start a name voting campaign for himself. Colbert started anyway, thus proofing he knows very little about Hungary. Period. He need not to -- but wise persons (even who plays stupid characters) gather information first, especially when encouraging over-the-internet service abusal. All the big voting campaign was in vain -- since Colbert is a living showman, all votes on him will be officially discarded. Lack of information can backfire.

You also defended Colbert('s character) as being stupid enough to make fun of Asian language. Another point of cultural differences: as far as I personally (being a European and a Hungarian adult) know, these jokes are regarded rather un-PC and offensive. Making dumb jokes about Asians (and not being criticized for it) is hardly an excuse. One who thinks this way (and makes/enjoys jokes such this) should take some lessons on history and tolerance. Maybe this should help to change the stereotypically senseless American approach of the outside world and to decrease cultural and other conflicts. EU countries are not 3rd world, "Asia" is not the same reference as Europe but even they/it were/was, never would be worth such behavior.

You also claimed that "Colbert (...) plays a character (...) bigoted and stupid, comments like the ones he made about Zrínyi Miklós are expected and purely satirical and not the views of the real Stephen Colbert." No problem, this is okay -- if one knows Colbert and his show. But he is well unknown over here, and again, think-first method could prevent him being identified with his character. Now chances are that Stephen Colbert's name get known in Hungary as "the person who named Zrinyi an asshole". Well paved way for a future local introduction for the man and his show, huh?

You also think you can decide whether the remarks such "Hungarian viewers typically found Stephen's remark about Zrinyi...senseless and repelling" are correctly based. You are wrong: calling any national historical hero an "asshole" IS offensive and repelling BY ITSELF, even if it was said by another angry undead historical opponent :) or an angry history expert which are again not the case. It was a primitive offense, nothing more, and as such it can be criticized without any further support. If you like, you may start any polling etc to prove that it was NOT offensive and repelling -- that is your free choice. To become civil is a good aim but being PC and practicing tolerance cannot be avoided if you want to reach it. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 195.56.225.23 (talk • contribs) .

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Yorzan.JPG)

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Yorzan.JPG. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Fritz Saalfeld (Talk) 16:29, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

IP address discussion page

I was just wondering y a discussion page for my IP address was created. i have a login already, i just never use it cuz i'm too lazy to log in. i don't care, i just think it's a waste of resources for me to have two discussion pages. the preceding unsigned comment was left by 147.26.232.92

8th mistake.

The edit I made to the Hungarian Bridge page was not vandalism, nor uneeded. It is factual information, which most likely was the cause for the entire revision of the vote. --Real tymer 21:32, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Okay, but I thought I made it pretty clear the Colbert himself disaproved of the ballot stuffing. --Real tymer 21:50, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

In regards to the Bleach media change

I am actually 67.49.159.223 but I'm under my username which I forgot to sign in. Anyway, thanks for inserting the link to Beat Crusaders on the Bleach media page, when the bot reverted it back. I knew it was correct but I didn't know why the bot did that. Anyway, thanks a bunch and thanks for doing it so fast.

--DigitalKaede a.k.a 67.49.159.223

Borderline Personality Disorder

It does look like vandalism, but if you look at the talk page for BPD (the section about Famous Borderline Personalities), you'll see why the user removed the section--which was only added yesterday and was immediately debated. The section's really weak. --Miss Dark 04:06, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Northern M0 Danube bridge

Not used to having my images reverted before I even finish uploading them. The Colbert Report is certainly responsible for the vast majority of the buzz about the M0 bridge, so a screenshot seems reasonable. Could I at least ask that you use an edit summary in the future, instead of anti-vandalism programs? savidan^{(talk) (e@)} 05:15, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Never mind, its all good now. savidan^{(talk) (e@)} 05:16, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

R&B Singer Mya was born in 1979 and her 5th album Control Freak will be out in 2007

the only website that says that she was born in 1978 is imdb, which was a type-o and they take months to make changes (i've sent in a request). her official website ( http://www.myamya.com/ ; temporarily down) says it's 1979.

Control Freak will come out in 2007 (oficial mya website).

Please quit changing it... yesterday Control Freak wasn't listed and her birth year was 1981.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 200.71.97.206 (talk • contribs) .

Anon user being a vandal again

I found and reverted edits by [[2]] at this page: [3]. Just thought I should point this out, since I noticed the user has been a vandal on many occasions. RobJ1981 04:18, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

George Bush

It was sarcasm. I used the same words he did to make a point that just because he says something, it doesn't make it a fact. Didn't you catch that? 2nd Piston Honda 06:16, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

hmm that a put down.

very sad. shall have to block this muck. gb —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 212.248.232.60 (talk • contribs) .

Imdb

Im not vandAlising anything im adding trivia that is truthful and accurate I appologise for going a BIT over the top though. I feel that I have the right to add something that is truthful I dont understand why there is a problem here when there is no problem over at imdb with that trivia .the same info is over at imdb with NO PROBLEMS.i would like to also ask why some unknown person in a small time band has their own wikipedia page??? that is definalty unfair and not right.I feel it should be taken down. just becuase of assocaition she is up there.

Can I add this trivia? which is not disrespctful its polite and states the truth.

Despite playing a large drum in the "Gogol Bordello" stage shows, Racine does not do the primary drum work.

She credits Hutz with giving her her first (and only) dancing job, working for his band Gogol Bordello.

Was at the Cannes Film Festival 2006, despite not having a film there —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.126.124.55 (talk • contribs) .

Terrence Malick page

Hi Gdo01-

I've been in a revert war with a group of individuals (many editing behind IP adresses) at the Terrence Malick page. I was wondering if you could refer me to an administrator/moderator who can sort this out, if you yourself aren't one already?

-Thanks, --Kitrus 20:17, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Nonsense

I didn't add any non-sense to wikipedia. 75.2.247.21 22:21, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Barack Obama

It is a fact that Bobby Rush accused white politicians of being racist for supporting Barack Obama. 75.2.247.21 22:22, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Special thanks to you for your efforts in fighting the recent outbreak of vandalism on the Barack Obama article. There is a newly posted proposal at the bottom of the article's talk page to put the article under semi-protect status. Given that the article appears to be closely watched, I hope that this will not be necessary, as at least some "drive-by" edits are helping to improve the article. But as you have been doing most of the heavy lifting, I think your opinion carries important weight and I encourage you to express it on the talk page. Thanks again. --HailFire 09:16, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

User:64.12.116.195

Good luck in getting this user blocked. It's a shared AOL IP and the blocks usually only last a few hours or so. --Bobblehead 04:12, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Your threats

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. --RCT 20:42, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Down the Road to Censorship

Do you work for NHTSA or MADD, or the police? Only reason I could think of for your redacting everything from the seat belt article that doesn't spout the party line on seat belts. My only plea is, Please don't let Wikipedia become yet another mouthpiece for big government. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.183.44.6 (talk • contribs) .

Colbert Report

Colbert does tell the straight up truth about whats going on in the world. Why edit that line out? — Preceding unsigned comment added by SolidSnake961 (talk • contribs)

The Boondocks

"# (cur) (last) 02:28, 3 September 2006 Gdo01 (Talk | contribs | block) m (rv this is for recurring and main characters not one time characters)

1. (cur) (last) 02:27, 3 September 2006 WhisperToMe (Talk | contribs | block) (→Characters)"

Then I'm making a place for one time characters. The one time characters HAVE to be listed somewhere. WhisperToMe 15:46, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Human rights and Social justice

Pro-choice being considered human rights or social justice is a matter of opinion, it does not belong on wikipedia. Please remove those categories from the article. 75.3.50.41 02:40, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Why should I answer that? I do not think genocide should be put in, I think Social justice and Human rights should removed, because that is opinion and it is bias to include them but not include the views of others. Wikipedia articles are not the place for you to express your personal beliefs. 75.3.50.41 02:46, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

I would suggest that human rights be kept, social justice removed. That the pro-choice movement aims to grant people additional freedom, hence additional rights, can be asserted regardless of one's personal POV. The social justice category, however, makes a value judgment about the subject. --tjstrf 03:03, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Please revert you POV change to my section in the Path to 9/11

Jeff Trattner 05:22, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Thank you Jeff Trattner 05:25, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

John Edwards article

You made an edit to my work on the John Edwards page, that is factually incorrect. I have reverted your mistake there is no need to thank me. You can review your obvious mistake here: [4]. Unfortunately, you might be confused about President Bush's position on stem cell research because most newspaper and TV reporters either do not know what they are talking about OR they are biased and they know the truth, but refuse to report it properly. We all know that Bush opposes embryonic stem cell research. But what most people don't know is that Bush supports adult stem cell research and cord blood stem cell research. Bush is the first President of the U.S. that signed a bill funding embryonic stem cell research. As a matter of fact, President Clinton is the President that signed the law to ban the federal funding of embryonic stem cell research. Yes, I know that if you read the popular press you would get a different point of view. But it just is not so. Please review the Stem Cell page for more information. Have a good day.--Getaway 02:27, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

reversion of super star destroyer article

(cur) (last) 02:21, 15 September 2006 Gdo01 (Talk | contribs) (Revert to the revision prior to revision 75810590 dated 2006-09-15 02:04:21 by 70.226.92.185 using popups

not an instance of vandalism... updated according the book of the star wars universeLocriani 06:03, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

looked at edit logs... partially correct. your reversion included some numbers that i did not edit, go figure? Locriani 06:04, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

actually, you were right about the numbers. no idea how that got changed... the only changes i made were to the designations "night hammer" and "knight hammer" perhaps a previous user? unfortunately, i don't have immediate access to the correct numbers... only the designations.Locriani 06:08, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

haha... unfortunate coincidence. at least it was easily resolved.Locriani 06:13, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

Remove nonsense

I thought this edit summary was amusing, given the nature of the article. Perhaps I don't take life seriously enough. Stephen B Streater 09:43, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

FYROM and EU

U are right. it was not making any sense. i re-worded it. do not revert pls. the EU uses only this name and this is the only name under which this country degotiates with EU. thanks for the notice. Hectorian 23:58, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

piss beer

dear Mr Gdo01 i recently recieved a message referring to the 'vandalism' i did on the piss beer page. All id like to say to you sir, is that piss beer tastes like wee —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.128.150.140 (talk • contribs) .

Anti-Americanism

Don't you think that we need to balance this article back to a NPOV. It's full of crap that no one really thinks / does. I just wanna make sure that if people look at this, they won't think that our nation is crap. You know what I mean? (LonghornJohnny 18:26, 23 September 2006 (UTC))

What I meant to say is that the article suggests that Anti-Americanism is right. I wanted to make sure that people will see that yes it's there, but it is not right. So I added a few good things about America in there but it's gone now. (LonghornJohnny 18:39, 23 September 2006 (UTC))

Thanks for the advice. I just came across this article though and did not have a lot of research done. I agree that a Criticism part should be included however. But it will be tough to keep it, since mostly real anti-american people write this article. :) Thanks again, will try to have it nicely sourced. (LonghornJohnny 18:53, 23 September 2006 (UTC))

olbermann

It showcases just how sharp his criticism of those he opposes is--Bairdso66 22:20, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

ANSWER

You deleted my accurate description of ANSWER as anti Israeli and anti american orginization STOP Censoring!

— Preceding unsigned comment added by MagicKirin (talk • contribs)

Please do not delete my signature

Please do not delete my signature when I add it to a post I forgot to sign. such action may be considered vandalism. Thanks. Lolakitty 02:54, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

ANSWER

The desciption I make of ANSWER is central to what they are and what they represent. I notice all of the users who object to this edit are on the liberal end of the political spectrum

I hope it it is not political correctness which is spuring on your revisions and warnings —The preceding unsigned comment was added by MagicKirin (talk • contribs) .

White and Nerdy Lyrics

Oh...sorry about that. I didn't know. Baseracer 02:23, 28 September 2006 (UTC) MagicKirin

ANSWER

You keep removing my edit which is backed up.

Please stop

MagicKirin 20:29, 29 September 2006 (UTC)MagicKirinMagicKirin 20:29, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for October 2nd.

The Wikipedia Signpost

Volume 2, Issue 40	2 October 2006	About the Signpost

New speedy deletion criteria added	News and notes
Wikipedia in the news	Features and admins
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:28, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Atlantic Records

DOn't worry man, I usually don't vandalize, heck, I got Vandalproof and two barnstars! I just am a big "Weird Al" Yankovic fan, I just bought Straight Outta Lynwood, and I saw the music video, and I just had to, come on, it is very tempting! :) Karrmann 01:53, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Butters

You’re right. It's not important at all. In fact, it's trivial! Hey, what section of the article did I put that trivial piece of information in again?

Don’t worry. I won’t put it back in the article, but I still think it was a relevant contribution. Xargon666x6 20:09, 03 October 2006

Sigma Pi Phi Article

Individuals by the SN of Robotam, and MrDarcy have made large wholescale changes and vandalisms on the page. The original article dated sept 25 has had no changes until october 3rd [5]. The change was reverted and they were told to bring it to the talk section. The response was to revert back . numerous times. Please provide assistance. 64.12.117.9 02:26, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Please take a look at this.

http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Sigma_Pi_Phi&diff=79383124&oldid=79380789

apolitical??

Olbermann's "worst person" honorees are apolitical??? I think not, it is a forum to bash conservatives--Bairdso66 00:23, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

Unfortunatley, I do watch the left-wing zealot on occasion and he does NOT crticize liberal politicians or commentators and if you watch him as you claim you would know Edward R. Olbemann's left-leaning ways on his "worst person" segment and otherwise--Bairdso66 00:42, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

I do watch him( I don't hear from other people, ao I resent the accusation), but I will leave it alone, I am just dissapointed that people are sugarcoating his bias, that's all...thanks for taking the time to respond--Bairdso66 00:50, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

Sun

Yeah, I left that on for like 5 seconds as a joke because I was showing my friend who was saying "I HOPE SUN DOESNT DIE." I was going to remove it. You might wanna take a break, you were all over that the second I posted it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bishusui (talk • contribs) 21:00, October 6, 2006 (EST).

Image Cats

Can you have a category such as [[Category:Fruits]] on images? I don't think so, but I wanted to make sure...Aquafish talk 01:45, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

User talk:206.225.97.94

Hi, I changed your addition of {{test}} on User talk:206.225.97.94 to {{verror}}, let me know if that's a problem. Cheers, Vectro 20:54, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Youtube

Oh. Sorry my bad, I saw that you removed a true fact (after some research) and so reverted it. Typer525 ^Talk 04:08, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Asylum

No Sporky is not my "sockpuppet" and there is NO "allowed" Information at this time availiable on the Asylum at this time the guy who keeps posting it is a former member who got mad and is breaking rules he agreed to when he first joined ....the first rule and I believe the only real rule is dont talk about the Asylum

but im sick and tired of trying to corect the leak of "illegal information" so ive givin up the witch hunt

and i hope the Info gets taken off before Gamecrazy Contacts Wikipedia about the incursion

I have mde A Edit to the Info on the Page that makes it No longer one sided against the site known as The Asylum and i hope it remains that way if it gets reverted it will be a shame for a person who posted the original info knew very little and because of the way he acted will never know any more than he does now

I have been a Member of said site for almost 2 years and have the knowledge to correct the info Properly and i will leave the info up because i will never succeed in my original intent of removing it.

Signpost updated for October 9th.

The Wikipedia Signpost

Volume 2, Issue 41	9 October 2006	About the Signpost

Interview with Board member Erik Möller	Wall Street Journal associates Wikipedia with Grupthink
Account used to create paid corporate entries shut down	Report from the Portuguese Wikipedia
News and notes	Wikipedia in the news
Features and admins	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 16:47, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Kira Nerys

Is there a wiki article on the mirror Kira? —Disavian (^talk/_contribs) 00:06, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Perhaps you'd like to start one? Or maybe there needs to be a Mirror Kira section of the Kira article? —Disavian (^talk/_contribs) 00:22, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

It should be noted...

I see you've been removing some instances of one of my bugaboos -- "it should be noted". It should be noted that I appreciate the effort. It should also be noted that there are something like 16,000 of them in Wikipedia, maybe 10,000 of which are in the main namespace. Sometimes seems to me that we've got a lot of editors who don't know the difference between an essay and an encyclopedia entry... --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 00:46, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Make Love, Not Warcraft

You participated in defense of this article's original content. This is just to let you know that a small group of editors has gutted the article, and due to the ensuing edit war, the article has been protected and a RFC has been issued. You may wish to return to the article and leave your two cents. - 66.93.144.171 01:41, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Michelle moore

I've removed the name from AIV, as it is not Michael Moore. Figured I'd tell you. Alphachimp 00:23, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

No worries. Keep up the good work. Alphachimp 00:25, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Loose Change - Popular Mechanics Video Links

Thanks for changing the links I added to the same content with better titles. I didn't notice the titles so I'm glad you found better links -- it was the content I found compelling. Cheers, -Quasipalm 05:28, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

ikkaku

well they must have changed the translation since i dled it...my version says "idiot...i told u along time ago when i taught u how to fight didn't i. that i have no intention of telling anyone besides u and yumichika that i have bankai". just remember m7 takes some liberties with the translations on their hq releases. good example is when grimmjow goes to fight ichigo the second time, m7's release has grimmjow talking a lot of trash. even saying he could cut off both arms and still beat ichigo...no other translation i've see is even close to that, including m7 initial release of the same chapter.

i really don't think that ikkaku teaching renji bankai is acurate, but i can't read japanese to confirm otherwise...so whatever, go with either since i can't really prove anything.

Batman quote

See WP:REF, Section 5. Glad to hear somebody knew the source! Cribcage 02:07, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for October 16th.

The Wikipedia Signpost

Volume 2, Issue 42	16 October 2006	About the Signpost

Wikipedia partially unblocked in mainland China	$100 million copyright fund stems discussion
Floyd Landis adopts "the Wikipedia defense" as appeal strategy	News and notes: Logo votes begin, milestones
Wikipedia in the news	Features and admins
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 17:48, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

You deleted my comment

It is Chamillionaire in the passenger seat in the video of White and Nerdy. Look at two pictures side by side

User:HomeComputer

cool, thank you. —ptk✰fgs 07:17, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

The Colbert Report

Your recent edit [6] looks like vandalism and I'm just asking for an explanation. You seem to be a good user with no history of vandalism yet you added this uncited claim that looks very much like the vandalism that occured on the elephant page. Gdo01 19:47, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Just having some fun Gdo01. I was hoping to put some of the elephant nonsense on Colbert's page. Sorry to be a pain. Publicus 19:50, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

I was hoping to use the cover of my username to sneak one in there. Everyone knows to watch out for the IP edits. :) Publicus 19:56, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Vendetta

Thanks for the heads up. It's rather surprising to me that it is this particular IP is the one getting so worked up. After all, I only gave them a 3 hour block. —WAvegetarian•(talk) 23:29, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

edits to Mike Malloy

Hello Gdo01 - I see you have been try to address the edits of User:Capsource1 to the Mike Malloy page. I have as well, and have run up to my 3R limit. Are you an administrator? If not, I believe we have reached the point that it would be beneficial to involve one. Or if that's not the right procedure, please tell me what is, as I have never been in a revert conflict before. Debivort 00:39, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Bleach and Jump superlative Stars

I agree that the mentions should be consistent, but I think that having them is important. Not important to the characters themselves in an in-universe sense, but in an external, establishing notability sense, it may be. Inclusion in the Jump superlative Stars games is a sign of an important character not simply within an individual series, but within manga as a whole. --tjstrf Now on editor review! 18:39, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Rugby World Cup

Quick work -- you reverted my mistake before I could! Cheers, Vectro 01:36, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism for Paul Hindemith

You indicated that the article for Paul Hindemith is okay. I have closed down my browser, cleared all my memory, cache, cookies, etc.. IF you read the first two lines of the article for Paul Hindemith the vandalism is still there even though the BOT shows that it removed the sentence. [7]. Your refresh suggest didn't work. --CyclePat 03:48, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

moving pages, properly

Please be aware that copying text from one article title to another... then deleting the original... is never permissible. If half a dozen people collaborate on an article, and we fail to maintain a record of it (somewhere), it amounts to plagiarism. The speedy deletion tag should have been placed at the title with only one edit in the history, so that the all of the edits from original article can be moved to the new title. As you can see, I've merged the histories so all authors still get credit for their work.

• 04:05, October 24, 2006 Freakofnurture (Talk | contribs | block) deleted "Temptation (Cradle of Filth song)" (Deleted to make way for move.)
• 04:05, October 24, 2006 Freakofnurture (Talk | contribs | block) moved Temptation (song) to Temptation (Cradle of Filth song)
• 04:08, October 24, 2006 Freakofnurture (Talk | contribs | block) restored "Temptation (Cradle of Filth song)" (1 revisions restored: merging lone revision from duplicate)

In the future, if you see anybody trying to pull a fast one, you can report it at WP:SPLICE. —freak(talk) 04:16, Oct. 24, 2006 (UTC)

Well, I assume that if you knew then what I've just told you, you would have realized the other user's rationale was flawed, and removed the tag. —freak(talk) 04:24, Oct. 24, 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for October 23rd.

The Wikipedia Signpost

Volume 2, Issue 43	23 October 2006	About the Signpost

Report from the Finnish Wikipedia	News and notes: Donation currencies added, milestones
Wikipedia in the news	Features and admins
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:20, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

What?

This was a dummy edit intended to get the attention of an admin in RC. --172.193.49.5 00:41, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Poke. --172.193.49.5

Yes, I assumed you were running multiple things at once. I figured inasmuch that they would prevent you from recieving messages, as some programs don't purge pages that often and prevent users from getting messages for some time. --172.193.49.5 00:51, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Vastro Lorde

Actually, we have seen a depiction of a Vastro Lorde before. Chapter 197, page 16. [8] The helmet of the silhouette looks identical to Ulquiorra's. –Gunslinger47 04:21, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Olbermann

What did I do to commit vandalism? Did I tell the truth about Keith Olbermann, and that he's a "liberal American journalist"? If that's vandalism, then you have a hell of a lot of people doing that to conservatives. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.159.155.69 (talk • contribs) .

AFd

In response to Your afd entry is formatted wrong and is interfering with the afd above it. It makes it seem like you voted to delete the Colbert Report entry when you are voting to delete the other article.

Sorted it. I think it's OK now. Cheers. Arcturus 20:23, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Obama

wasn\'t vandalism - have no idea where the slashes, etc. came from on obama page .. ?? was only trying to add \" and is a Democrat \" and all of the other gibberish showed up .. sorry. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bibra (talk • contribs) .

Are you a bot?

You seem really fast... even faster than the normal bot around here -- 142.33.70.36 18:18, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Heh, you beat my test to make sure AVB was actually responding.... wow -- Tawker 18:36, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for October 30th.

The Wikipedia Signpost

Volume 2, Issue 44	30 October 2006	About the Signpost

Wales resigns chair position as reorganization underway	Hypothetical valuation of Wikipedia scrutinized
Work underway to purge plagiarized text from articles	Librarian creates video course about Wikipedia
Report from the Japanese Wikipedia	News and notes: Commemorative mosaic started, milestones
Features and admins	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:15, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

What! No barnstar yet?

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		High time you were awarded one for all the RC patrolling. Long may you keep it up! LittleOldMe 18:14, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

just an idea

I was looking through the history of one of the Lost pages and noticed one of your recent reversions - it wasn't to mine, but I wanted to make a suggestion. When I see something that needs a cite, I just put in , and it puts a marker saying "Citation needed" - this seems to me to be more constructive than just a blanket RV. I don't know what the official rule is, but putting a marker for a citation alerts the community that something needs to either be cited or removed, and then remove it in a couple weeks if nobody has come forth with a cite. I just think that if new users are making efforts that aren't quite right, it would be better to be polite and note what can be made better than just erasing it, so they don't get discouraged or offended. Riverbend 18:21, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs Mark Wahlberg Static (Bleach album) Jack Plotnick Edgar Stiles Dave Jeser Bleach bypass Ultimate Fantastic Four Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa Fumiko Orikasa Tite Kubo Matt Silverstein Rita Cosby Yuuka Nanri Katrina Holden Bronson Starvin' Marvin Economic and Monetary Community of Central Africa Masakazu Morita Playboy Gimli (Middle-earth)

Cleanup Criticism of Family Guy ASEAN Free Trade Area Minas Tirith Merge Urahara Shōten Wayne Enterprises Mondegreen Add Sources King of the Hill Sabre Dance The Da Vinci Code (film) Wikify Pundit (politics) Nationalization Colourisation Expand Demographic history of the United States Travis Mayweather Haber process

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 01:48, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for November 6th.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 2, Issue 45	6 November 2006	About the Signpost

Arbitration election campaigns begin	Blogger studies Wikipedia appearance in search results
Intelligence wiki receives media attention	Report from the German Wikipedia
News and notes: Foundation donation, milestones	Wikipedia in the News
Features and admins	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:12, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Star Trek depictions

Your artistic renditions of Kira and Sisko are appreciated but how do they help the article? According to WP:Images, an image should be "relevant to the article they appear in and be of sufficient notability (relative to the article's topic)." The images you placed were just fan art done by yourself. I know you are an admin but I still do not see any rationale for fan art done by the user themselves should be on an encyclopedic page. Gdo01 00:58, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

They weren't by me. The reason I included them is because they are free license images, as opposed to the fair use images already present. -- Zanimum 16:54, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

My bad

My bad. Mak (talk) 00:22, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Robert Gates

Dr. Gates is NOT yet the Secretary of Defense; he has been nominated by President Bush. He will not be Secretary until and unless confirmed by the Senate. --Mhking 18:15, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Fair deal; I was trying to figure out who went nuts with the infobox. No worries. --Mhking 18:18, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Revert rule

Hey, I'm not sure this is the place where to reach you.

I got a cuple of messages from you telling me to stop editing pages. What's the deal with that?

What happened is the following: I edited one page to make a link and then the link page. Then the page got deleted twice, and all I did is replace the stuff I wrote on it. Is that against the rules? What-s the logic behind that? Anyway, why are YOU telling me what to do?

Again, I'm not sure how this goes so please explain me what's going on. thanks. User:barbabarba

Please see WP:3RR. Basically you can only revert to your version of an article three times. The purpose of this is to restrict edit wars like the one that is occurring on your page and Borat. Gdo01 07:29, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Ok thanks, but I still don't understand the following: 1-what would you recomment then? I made a page with NEW info that others might find useful (which is the purpose of the whole site) and this guys keep deleting it and redirecting it to the page I stemmed it from, for no good reason (he just deletes the info I edited, he doesn't include them where he claims they should be instead).

Ok, thanks for the explaination, I appreciate the work and effort. I guess I won't be editing that info again since it seems it'a nich nich.

V for Vendetta as an anti-modernist film

I have put the following message on the V for Vendetta discussion section, concerning your question regarding the suppose anti-modernism in V for Vendetta:

Someone asked me why V for Vendetta is a anti-modernist film, since I put that term as a category. Here is my opinion.

I believe that even though the plot of this movie is set in a futuristic society, its argument is a clear protest on how society is developing. It is not only just a warning; it is also a critique on the ways things are being conducted in the present time. I mean, it is clear the connections concerning America and its suppose propaganda machine. Even if you don't accept that connection as clear, you have to understand, as it is part of the own plot, that there is a reference to the media as being use to fool people. Please discuss.Maziotis 11:00, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:V_for_Vendetta_%28film%29"

Raviraj

When listing deaths under current events: "Do not list the ordinary deaths of prominent persons here. That's what Recent deaths is for. Exceptions to this rule are made for persons of extreme prominence, such as Ronald Reagan, John Paul II, or the Queen Mother." Raviraj does not meet the criteria of extreme prominence. KazakhPol 05:59, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

User:WTF

hey thats my brother mind your own business you jerk —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lman1987 (talk • contribs) .

Hi Gerardo. I moved Xtremeblur's user page back, and then deleted it per their request. I think it is over, but if you see anything else happen, please let me know. Good work. ×Meegs 09:06, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for November 13th.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 2, Issue 46	13 November 2006	About the Signpost

Full accessibility, dramatic growth reported for Chinese Wikipedia	ArbCom elections: Information on Elections
Report identifies Wikipedia as a leader in non-US traffic	News and notes: Board passes four resolutions, milestones
Wikipedia in the News	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:08, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Nancy Pelosi Vandalism

I have recently reverted yet another act of vandalism directed at the Nancy Pelosi article. Based upon the article's edit history, I noticed that you have reverted vandalism in the article more than once in the last day. Considering the recent spike in vandalism, would a request for page protection be in order? I would make the request myself, but unfortunately, I am unfamiliar with the procedure for making a request. --TommyBoy 18:59, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for following up on my request so quickly. --TommyBoy 19:21, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Sorry

WP:AIV: I tried to revert myself, but you did first. The history kept staying the same no matter how many times I used popups, I tried refreshing my browser cache, but it still didn't change, so I decided to do it manually. It then turned out the popups did work, so I had already reverted it, but I did an extra revert, which took place slightly after you reported a user, thusly, I accidentally reverted you. That will most likely be the most confusing thing you will ever hear. —The Great Llama ^talk 20:17, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Stephanie (Lazy Town)

You marked an edit of mine as being irrelevant. I would like you to see WIKI article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mustard_Man

The Stephanie character has gained fame in the same manner as mustard man. It is a meme with an even stronger following than the previous mentioned article.

Id like you to revert my change or rewrite it in a manner you approve of. I didnt add links to examples since some of them may be inappropriate for her normal audience.

The last line of the article "She also holds the secret recipe to a really great cake, which is "a piece of cake to bake."" is in reference to the fad that made her into an internet Meme. I argue that my edit was far more useful than the last sentence. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ciper (talk • contribs) .

Your user page

Would you like your user page semi-protected? _JD^talk 17:34, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

I've semi-protected your user page. _JD^talk 17:54, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. I was handling a persistent IP vandal so I couldn't respond earlier. Gdo01 17:55, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Talkpage spamming

Thanks for reverting that. I already reported that guy- he has a history of talkpage spamming, personal attacks (he told me to go play in the road, but I'm too old for that!), and some blocks for incivility. I'm hoping this will be an indefinite ban. Nwwaew(My talk page) 13:31, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

This is odd! I put his username in, and it comes back with another username. Looks like he used some sort of characters not shown there. Nwwaew(My talk page) 13:34, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

My bad- I went to a Special page. Anyway, hes been blocked again for 24 hours, and there was an autoblock on his IP, also. Nwwaew(My talk page) 13:44, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Hello, Gdo01

After a mounth, I discovered what is my error editing the "Weird Al" Yankovic article. The added content was a mistake - I was editing and translating the portuguese article, and the translation goes to the wrong place... That was not a proprosital vandalism. Sorry! --Gabriel de Oliveira Padoan 15:11, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Bount Clarification

"there is no english word ritz or friede or baura or nieder or geselle" is what you said, but I never said there was an English word Ritz, Friede, Baura, Nieder of Geselle. I stated that the English translation of those German words, or the translations of the closest word to those German names, would be ______.

For example, I changed "The German translation of Ritz is crack, cut or scratch..." to "The English translation of Ritz is crack, cut or scratch..." because, correct me if I'm wrong, but the German translation of a German word would still be the same word in German, but the English translation of a German word would be a word in English. If that's the case, then all the ones I've changed from "the German translation of" to "the English translation of" would be valid.

Nieder and Baura, however, might be justified in being reverted to their previous forms. I used three seperate translators and a German dictionary to get the definitions for Nieder and Bauraum (closest German word to Baura), but I couldn't see any way of linking Nieder the doll's abilities to Nieder the definition. As for Bauraum, that seemed to be more of a verb than a noun, and the only link between the doll Baura's abilities to the word Bauraum are that they are both spatial related. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by HayashiKun (talk • contribs) .

Hmm, was unaware of the unsigned thingy. Anyways, I agree with you that the terminology is indeed confusing. Keep up the anti-vandalism work! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by HayashiKun (talk • contribs) .

Hmm... well, the way I'm looking at it, using Ritz as an example, the word itself is already German, right? Therefore the German word Ritz, in the English language, would mean crack. That seems more correct to me. It's still quite confusing, but that's the way I'm looking at it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by HayashiKun (talk • contribs) .

Ritz is German for crack.. that sounds right, if if you mean it as in the German word Ritz means crack in English. Yep, that sounds right. Good job! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by HayashiKun (talk • contribs) .

W. S. Gilbert

Thanks for helping out against vandals during our time on the front page! Adam Cuerden ^talk 19:59, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Re Wikipedians by number of edits

Thanks for the note Gdo01. -- Szvest → ^{Wiki Me Up ®} 14:23, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Xtacles

Re: Frisky Dingo, the Xtacle's paycheck in episode 5 is written out to "Xtacle Leroy." An on-screen spelling is canonical, the website is not. Rob T Firefly 22:34, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for November 20th.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 2, Issue 47	20 November 2006	About the Signpost

One week later, Wikipedia reblocked in mainland China	Military history dominates writing contest
News and notes: Wikibooks donation, milestones	Wikipedia in the News
Features and admins	Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:30, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for November 27th.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 2, Issue 48	27 November 2006	About the Signpost

Arbitration Committee elections: Candidate profiles	Steward elections begin
Group apologizes for using Wikipedia name in online arts fundraiser	News and notes: 1.5 million articles, milestones
Wikipedia in the News	Features and admins
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 01:37, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Deleted my "preceded by" statement.

I thought that although this was an unrelated series, since it is still a Batman series, it can be linked to the previous films in that box just stating that it is not in the same continuity. And I did do that with the 66 and 89 film. What's wrong with that? Superstooge 23:50, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for December 4th.

The Wikipedia Signpost Weekly Delivery

Volume 2, Issue 49	4 December 2006	About the Signpost

Arbitration Committee elections open	The Seigenthaler incident: One year later
Wikimedia celebrates Commons milestone, plans fundraiser	Wikipedia wins award in one country, reported blocked in another
News and notes: Steward elections continue, milestones	Wikipedia in the News
Features and admins	The Report on Lengthy Litigation

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:36, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Invite

Hey there! I saw you reverting or removing linkspam. Thanks! If you're interested, come visit us in Wikipedia:WikiProject Spam so we can work together in our efforts to clean spam from Wikipedia. Hu12 06:47, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

What is wrong with the MAD reference?

What makes a reference to MAD Magazine any less significant that The Simpsons, Family Guy, The Muppets, or Superman? Why don't these references get removed as well? billdescoteaux 22:00, 05 December 2006 (PST)

Thank you

Thank you for your message, I'm appreciate it. ♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ ^{Walkie-talkie} 18:11, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, I thought it was Constipated as I downloaded it under that name. It is indeed "A complicated song"...

nobel Prize

You reverted my edit regarding Jimmy Carter's reason for winning the Nobel peace. As the commitee chair stated we did it to kick George Bush in the shins and the failure of the IAEA will you reconsider your edit? Decato 22:58, 6 December 2006 (UTC)