Computer-on-module: Difference between revisions
m Disambiguated: ESM → Embedded System Module, eTX → ETX (form factor), MXM → Mobile PCI Express Module |
ADLINK is the publisher of this JPEG image |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
The terms "Computer-on-Module" and "COM" were coined by market researcher Venture Development Corp (VDC) and first appeared in VDC's report on the Global Market for Merchant Computer Boards in Real-time and Embedded Applications<ref name=vdc_report>[http://linuxdevices.org/ldfiles/misc/vdc-switch-fabric-architectures-report-excerpt-nov2001.jpg Global Market for Merchant Computer Boards in Real-time and Embedded Applications report]</ref>, published in November 2001. The terms became more prominent upon industry standardization of the [[COM Express]] format in 2005. |
The terms "Computer-on-Module" and "COM" were coined by market researcher Venture Development Corp (VDC) and first appeared in VDC's report on the Global Market for Merchant Computer Boards in Real-time and Embedded Applications<ref name=vdc_report>[http://linuxdevices.org/ldfiles/misc/vdc-switch-fabric-architectures-report-excerpt-nov2001.jpg Global Market for Merchant Computer Boards in Real-time and Embedded Applications report]</ref>, published in November 2001. The terms became more prominent upon industry standardization of the [[COM Express]] format in 2005. |
||
There is no clear "first Computer-on-Module" product, since numerous small component-like single board computers were already on the market<ref name=tiny_sbcs>[http://linuxdevices.org/ldfiles/misc/small-linux-capable-boards-prior-to-2005-v2.jpg COM-like Linux capable boards, announced prior to 2005]</ref><ref name=adlink_coms_history> |
There is no clear "first Computer-on-Module" product, since numerous small component-like single board computers were already on the market<ref name=tiny_sbcs>[http://linuxdevices.org/ldfiles/misc/small-linux-capable-boards-prior-to-2005-v2.jpg COM-like Linux capable boards, announced prior to 2005]</ref><ref name=adlink_coms_history>{{cite web |
||
|url = http://linuxdevices.org/ldfiles/misc/adlink-history-of-coms-june2013.jpg |
|||
|title = History of COMs |
|||
|publisher = [[ADLINK]]}}</ref> when VDC initially introduced the term. |
|||
COM Express is just one of many standardized Computer-on-module formats. Other open-spec COM standards include [[SMARC]], [[Qseven]], [[Embedded System Module|ESM]], [[XTX]], and [[ETX (form factor)|eTX]]. Additionally, many manufacturers offer COMs with proprietary formats. |
COM Express is just one of many standardized Computer-on-module formats. Other open-spec COM standards include [[SMARC]], [[Qseven]], [[Embedded System Module|ESM]], [[XTX]], and [[ETX (form factor)|eTX]]. Additionally, many manufacturers offer COMs with proprietary formats. |
||
Revision as of 11:53, 13 November 2019
A computer-on-module (COM) is a type of single-board computer (SBC), a subtype of an embedded computer system. An extension of the concept of system on chip (SoC) and system in package (SiP), COM lies between a full-up computer and a microcontroller in nature. It is very similar to a system on module (SOM).
Design
COMs are complete embedded computers built on a single circuit board.[1] The design is centered on a microprocessor with RAM, input/output controllers and all other features needed to be a functional computer on the one board. However, unlike a single-board computer, the COM usually lacks the standard connectors for any input/output peripherals to be attached directly to the board.
The module usually needs to be mounted on a carrier board (or "baseboard") which breaks the bus out to standard peripheral connectors. Some COMs also include peripheral connectors. Some can be used without a carrier.
A COM solution offers a dense package computer system for use in small or specialized applications requiring low power consumption or small physical size as is needed in embedded systems. As a COM is very compact and highly integrated, even complex CPUs, including multi-core technology, can be realized on a COM.
Some devices also incorporate field-programmable gate array (FPGA) components. FPGA-based functions can be added as IP cores to the COM itself or to the carrier card. Using FPGA IP cores adds to the modularity of a COM concept, because I/O functions can be adapted to special needs without extensive rewiring on the printed circuit board.[2]
History
The terms "Computer-on-Module" and "COM" were coined by market researcher Venture Development Corp (VDC) and first appeared in VDC's report on the Global Market for Merchant Computer Boards in Real-time and Embedded Applications[3], published in November 2001. The terms became more prominent upon industry standardization of the COM Express format in 2005.
There is no clear "first Computer-on-Module" product, since numerous small component-like single board computers were already on the market[4][5] when VDC initially introduced the term.
COM Express is just one of many standardized Computer-on-module formats. Other open-spec COM standards include SMARC, Qseven, ESM, XTX, and eTX. Additionally, many manufacturers offer COMs with proprietary formats.
Some proprietary COM formats have modified SODIMM and MXM edge-connector style designs, while others have arbitrary rectangular dimensions along with various types of high density board-to-board connectors [6][7]. Notably, the Raspberry Pi Compute Module is designed in a 200-pin SODIMM format.
Benefits
Using a carrier board is a benefit in many cases, as it can implement special I/O interfaces, memory devices, connectors or form factors. Separating the design of the carrier board and COM makes design concepts more modular, if needed. A carrier tailored to a special application may involve high design overhead by itself. If the actual processor and main I/O controllers are located on a COM, it is much easier, for example, to upgrade a CPU component to the next generation, without having to redesign a very specialized carrier as well. This can save costs and shorten development times. On the other hand, this only works if the board-to-board connection between the COM and its carrier remains compatible between upgrades.
Other benefits of using COM products instead of ground-up development include reducing time to market (TTM), risk reduction, cost savings, choice of a variety of CPUs, reduced requirements and time for customer design, and the ability to conduct both hardware and software development simultaneously [8].
See also
References
- ^ Typical COM product line
- ^ Technologic Systems FPGA based COM modules
- ^ Global Market for Merchant Computer Boards in Real-time and Embedded Applications report
- ^ COM-like Linux capable boards, announced prior to 2005
- ^ "History of COMs". ADLINK.
- ^ Gumstix launch PR
- ^ Inforce Micro SoMs
- ^ Computer on Modules - Technical Reference Manuals
