Jump to content

Talk:Witness (Katy Perry album): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
comment
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 115: Line 115:


:I would take that with a grain of salt because record companies are known to often inflate their artists' numbers for promotional purposes. Can you find anything not affiliated with Katy or her label that reports such figures? [[User:SNUGGUMS|<b style="color:#009900">SNUGGUMS</b>]] ([[User talk:SNUGGUMS|<b style="color:#009900">talk</b>]] / [[Special:Contributions/SNUGGUMS|<b style="color:#009900">edits</b>]]) 16:33, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
:I would take that with a grain of salt because record companies are known to often inflate their artists' numbers for promotional purposes. Can you find anything not affiliated with Katy or her label that reports such figures? [[User:SNUGGUMS|<b style="color:#009900">SNUGGUMS</b>]] ([[User talk:SNUGGUMS|<b style="color:#009900">talk</b>]] / [[Special:Contributions/SNUGGUMS|<b style="color:#009900">edits</b>]]) 16:33, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

== Witness Is 3x Platinum In India ==

Witness Sold Over 600,000 Copies In Inida And Should Be Added [[User:LaVozSA|LaVozSA]] ([[User talk:LaVozSA|talk]]) 19:01, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:01, 14 November 2019

Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 28, 2017.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that ticket purchases for Witness: The Tour will include copies of Katy Perry's album Witness?

Hey Hey Hey is a single

Someone please add this to Katy Perry's page and make a page for it — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.109.118.90 (talk) 16:48, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done there is no officially confirmed release date for the track. Only a music video has been released so far, which IS NOT the same thing as a single release. Also, single release (or lack thereof) isn't an automatic indicator of whether something should have an article; what matters is that a song have enough independent coverage from credible secondary sources outside of album reviews that aren't publications closely affiliated with the artist. See WP:Notability (music)#Songs for more. Snuggums (talk / edits) 16:54, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Witness (Katy Perry album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:20, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Witness (Katy Perry album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:29, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please add this on the section of critical reception: Idolator listed witness at number 8 on their list of the best pop albums and EP's of 2017

Please add this on the section of critical reception: Idolator listed witness at number 8 on their list of the best pop albums of 2017 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.14.219.173 (talk) 16:17, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Witness is platinum in Brazil

WITNESS HAS BEEN ALREADY CERTIFIED PLATINUM IN BRAZIL AND ALSO HAS SOLD MORE THAN 930K COPIES WORLDWIDE WITH 296K COPIES IN USA ALONE, EDID THE PAGE. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.14.173.20 (talk) 20:01, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello? Witness is platinum in Brazil already, why it is not reflected???? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.82.129.72 (talk) 17:34, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Composition

I cannot edit the article to do it myself since, while I have been on Wikipedia for more than 30 days, I don't have 500 edits yet, but I think the section Composition needs some expansion. Album articles tend to describe all songs or at least most of them, but this one stops at track 6 ("Power") for some reason, even though Witness contains 15 songs (or even 17 on some editions). Bizarre BizarreTalk modern to me 16:11, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that it's incomplete and needs more elaboration, and will probably expand it once I have enough resources and time unless someone else beats me to it. Snuggums (talk / edits) 16:32, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Best album"?

Why is the album called her best album here?! Wikipedia is supposed to be objective, so that is absolutely inacceptable. NayruLink (talk) 14:35, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nowhere it is mentioned that Witness is her best album, where did you even read such statement? —IB [ Poke ] 15:40, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If I type in a word in the search bar, it shows me articles that fit to these words. If I search Witness, it says there "Witness (Katy Perry album)" and under it "Katy Perry's best album.". I don't know how else to explain it, just type in Witness and there you have it. NayruLink (talk) 11:51, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
No it does not show that anywhere, stop daydreaming. —IB [ Poke ] 13:04, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@IndianBio: It does indeed show that if you search at the www.wikipedia.org portal or on the mobile site. I'll fix it. Jc86035 (talk) 14:44, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oh its on the Portal? That's why I can't find it searching in this article. —IB [ Poke ] 14:50, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@IndianBio: It was the description on the Wikidata item. NayruLink, see WP:Short descriptions. Jc86035 (talk) 14:59, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Daydreaming, excuse me?! I was serious and you're bitching around here, thank you very much, you were a great help! Not. Gladly it was changed now, I had no idea how to change it. NayruLink (talk) 16:10, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It was not in this article as I explained before and the same has been corroborated by Jc86035. Hell it was not even in the en.wiki url, it was the front end portal. I can understand you have no clue regarding where you have seen it, but your opening post said you are seeing it in this article. —IB [ Poke ] 17:07, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I did not write "In this article", I wrote "here" not knowing how to call the description. NayruLink (talk) 16:43, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Commercial Performance

I'm sure this is a contentious topic, but I think it should be mentioned that the album has been less commercially successful than either Perry or her label anticipated. The album has had poor longevity on WW charts, is her first album to not produce a #1 let alone a Top 3 in the US, and hasn't reached 1M sales WW yet.

She talks about it here: http://popcrush.com/katy-perry-depression-details-quotes/

The head of her record label, Capitol, also talked about it here: https://variety.com/2018/music/news/steve-barnett-capitol-interview-katy-perry-niall-horan-1202660297/

I get that with Stan culture this could be a contentious addition, but I think it's worth evaluating. User:Heartgears (talk) 15:38, 17 July 2018 (EST)

First of all, PopCrush isn't exactly a good source to use per WP:ALBUMAVOID (at least for original reporting), so only the link it leads to (Vogue Australia) would be appropriate to cite if anything. Secondly, it doesn't really matter what an artist or label expects from material commercially, only the actual results of commercial performance are worth mentioning. Third, this would technically be her second album (after Katy Hudson which was far less commercially successful than this) to not have any US top 3 songs, so it's not like this is completely new experience for her. Snuggums (talk / edits) 20:57, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It under-performing according to expectations, and a third party reporting on it, would make it worthy of inclusion as long as you've got a reliable source to say it (not pop crush). That being said, probably just a vague comment about it (ie it underperformed according Perry/label/whoever - not all the trivia about it being the first album to not have have a #1 single or do this or that.) Sergecross73 msg me 19:39, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Even with proper sourcing, I fail to see how one's expectations are worth noting when they're purely speculative and aren't concrete details to work with unlike the official results. It's best to just focus on what actually happened. Snuggums (talk / edits) 20:27, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
That doesn’t make any sense. “Speculation” and “expectation” are not the same thing. Measuring expectation versus actual performance is one of the major ways of figuring whether a commercial product is considered a success or failure. Expectation is what gives sales and revenue info context. To one artist, 100,000 sold could be a breakthrough success, while to a famous veteran, it could be a devastating failure. I’m all for ignoring the random expectations of a random blogger or journalist, but Perry or her label’s expectations would be some of the most notable sales commentary in existence for her own releases. Sergecross73 msg me 03:42, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for interrupting the conversation; I think that a breif sentence on Perry's depression as related to the album would be beneficial either here or on her primary Wikipedia page as it is covered by several news outlets. Aoba47 (talk) 01:45, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I believe that’s worth mentioning too. Sergecross73 msg me 18:39, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 18 July 2018

79.53.88.66 (talk) 18:34, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Danski454 (talk) 18:41, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Brief article description vandalism

The description that shows up when searching for the album's name has once again been manipulated. It now says "album by Katia Pérez". This is the second time now that it was changed to something wrong, which is completely unacceptable. I don't have enough skills to edit it, so could please someone correct it? Also how can this be prevented? NayruLink (talk) 17:50, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see that when I go into edit mode. If this does turn up when searching for it, then that's probably something elsewhere gone wrong. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 20:53, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Changes Needed

Witness has since sold 700, 000 copies in the US and should be changed to platinum with the updated sales also China should be added as she was certified 5x platinum there with her album selling 500,000 copied LaVozSA (talk) 10:36, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@LaVozSA: I just checked RIAA and there is no evidence of US certification. I am not aware of a certifying organization in China, but if you have a reliable source for sales in China, they can be added. --Muhandes (talk) 08:31, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

CHANGES NEEDED

Her record label Capitol has confirmed witness sold over 3 million copies world wide (now 800,000) this needs to be changed also it sold over a million copies in the us KatSwiPerr (talk) 14:42, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not 800,000 KatSwiPerr (talk) 14:43, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I would take that with a grain of salt because record companies are known to often inflate their artists' numbers for promotional purposes. Can you find anything not affiliated with Katy or her label that reports such figures? SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 16:33, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Witness Is 3x Platinum In India

Witness Sold Over 600,000 Copies In Inida And Should Be Added LaVozSA (talk) 19:01, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Witness_(Katy_Perry_album)&oldid=926183496"