User talk:Ainz Ooal Gown

Veteran Editor

If you leave a new message on this page, I will reply on this page unless you ask me to reply elsewhere.

Today is 7 January 2025

It is approximately 9:20 PM in this user's locale. ( to update.)

Archives (Index)

2020/February 2020/January 2019/November 2019/October 2020/June 2020/July 2020/April 2019/March 2019/May 2019/September 2020/March 2020/May 2019/April 2019/June 2019/July 2019/January 2019/February 2019/December 2019/August 2018/December

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Unexplained revert in "Lokma"

Hi, I saw that you just made this revert in the Lokma article: [1], but you didn't give any explanation in the edit summary. The edits you reverted don't seem to be vandalism, and appear to have corrected the Greek and Hebrew translations. I'm going to restore the edits, but please let me know if there's some reason you think that's wrong, thanks. --IamNotU (talk) 14:09, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

That happened by mistake, I guess. I should have examined it further. "loukoumas" word is Greek but I couldn't seem to check it's meaning using Google translate. Thanks for reverting though. Masum Reza^📞 14:21, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

IamNotU, the edit was not explained either and the words didn't sound English. Why in hell are you blaming amasurezarock?. You should assume good faith.--SharabSalam (talk) 15:38, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

SharabSalam, I wasn't "blaming" anyone. It seemed like the revert was a mistake, but I wasn't sure and wanted to double-check with Masumrezarock100 in case it was me who was mistaken. Swearing and telling me to assume good faith seems somewhat ironic... --IamNotU (talk) 01:40, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Rules for Fools

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Rules for Fools. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

You removed my post

Dear Masumrezarock100, I have just added an edit to the Parliamentary Office of Science & Technology (POST) page, which I have agreed with POST's Communications Manager. But you have removed it. It did take a while to write it, so I will start again, but please can you advise how I show you it is approved and stop you removing it? Thanks for your help, Hazel — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.77.0.196 (talk) 10:44, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

It seems you have a conflict of interest. Editors with COI or paid editors are suggested to propose changes on the talk page. Please read our policies (WP:PAID and WP:COI) first. Also you need to add reliable sources per our verifiability policy, see referencing for beginners to learn how we add citations. Thanks. Masum Reza^📞 11:04, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Dear Masumrezarock100, sorry I don't understand why there might be any conflict of interest. Last week I spoke to the Communications Manager at the Parliamentary Office of Science & Technology (POST) and he agreed I could edit the page with my details, to commemorate into POST's history that I was the first ever employee back in 1988. In my first attempt, I included my LinkedIn profile in order to explain that my name is now Hazel Parrock, whereas in 1988, I was known by my maiden name, Hazel Starmer. After you removed my first edit, I tried again and this time I excluded this reference. All I want to add is the following:

"In 1988, Hazel Starmer was hired as the first Research & Operations Manager to establish the office, set up processes and procedures and demonstrate Proof of Concept for this new ‘intelligence service’. She produced the first briefing papers, including "AIDS is the most important infectious public problem this century", "The Animals (Scientific Procedures) Bill", "The Brain Drain - how seriously should MPs take it?" and "Human Embryological Research in the UK - should it be banned or permitted?"

Please can you explain why this might show any conflict of interest. Thank you for your help, Hazel Hazel Parrock (talk) 23:14, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

@Hazel Parrock: Your employer/manager should know that Wikipedia is not a social media and no one here owns articles. In other words, we do not care if your manager granted you the permission to edit the article about their organization/company or not. All contents in this encyclopedia must be verifiable and supported by reliable sources. As described in WP:BURDEN, the burden of adding sources relies on the editor who added that unsourced content. If you want to include something to the article, please add a reliable source that supports the content. And about that link to LinkedIn, you should not add links to the main body of an article, per our manual of style and guidelines about external links. In fact, a link to a LinkedIn profile should not be added to the article! Next, if you have an external relationships with the subject, you have an conflict of interest in that topic. You are editing the page about your company or where you work, which mean you have an conflict of interest. Please read WP:COI to learn more about this policy. And now, if you are being compensated for your contributions to Wikipedia your must disclose your employer on your userpage as described in WP:PAID and our terms of use. All of the above rules/guidelines/polices help us to keep this encyclopedia nuetral and verifiable. Continuous violation of our policies may result in a temporary or indefinite block. I hope above sentences make sense. If you are unhappy about this or do not wish to comply with our rules, please find some alternative outlets. Please also read our Welcome page. You'll find more information about Wikipedia there. I have already left a note about this on your talk page, so I would appreciate if read the message. Thanks. Masum Reza^📞 08:23, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

Hi Masum Reza, please accept my apologies, I don't know how to find my talk page and I had no intention of causing any problem, I thought I was just doing what I had been asked to do. I am not employed by POST now, so they are not my employer, I do not work there. However, in 1988 I was the first ever employee of POST and I have been invited to update the history record. I am not sure how to do this now, as I don't know how to provide a verifiable source because the people I worked with at that time in the Houses of Parliament (Sir Gerard Vaughan, Sir Trevor Skeet, Sir Ian Lloyd and others) have all passed away, so I am the only reliable source left alive. ....An idea - would the person at POST now responsible for leading the organisation be permitted to update the page? If so, I will leave it with him and not get involved. As I said, please accept my apologies, I had no wish to infringe any guidelines. Many thanks for your help, Hazel 79.77.0.196 (talk) 10:27, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

No, they should not. They should comply with our COI policy and propose changes on the talk page first. Masum Reza^📞 12:16, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

This week's article for improvement (week 46, 2019)

The Coleco Gemini video game console, a console clone of the Atari 2600 produced by Coleco in 1983 Hello, Masumrezarock100. The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Coleco Gemini Please be bold and help to improve this article! Previous selections: Concert • Audience Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 11 November 2019 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI •

Please comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Personal web page

Dear sir,

I think I may give my Personal web page link.

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zahanzeb (talk • contribs) 05:20, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

No, you may not. Please read our guidelines and policies about external links and WP:SPAM. I already have left two messages on your talk page about this. Masum Reza^📞 05:28, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

upsetting content

I am not alright this information about me being available in one spot as it is of a personal nature. I was very young and angry and constantly drunk when all this media attention came upon me and I used it to be vengeful and self-pitying. Whenever a future employee or potential love interest looks me up -- they will see this. Whenever I think of it I feel upset with myself and although I have really begun to let that go-- I really do not like so much of the negativity I released into the world to be able to be looked up in one spot. 

It was very upsetting to see all this and I would like it gone. I really appreciate you hearing me out and taking out the early life and anything negative about anyone out of this wiki article. It means so much to me. I am trying to create more healing now that I have done enough of my own after letting go of blame and anger. This page is not only an embarrassment to me but also contributes to much of the poison in our society. It is not at all that many would ever look me up or have but I don't want my name so blatantly linked to me. Please just let me take out what is hurtful to me, my family and anyone reading and leave what is positive. And whoever keeps changing it back or changing it to something else (did someone else hop in and edit again or was that my pissed off imagination?)

I apologize if this feels like a personal attack. I am upset so it might but I know it's not your fault. Being real, I am mostly mad at myself for telling my story so publically. There are better ways for this to be done in a way that helps people rather than getting them to focus on anger and who is to blame.

ooohhhhh yeah.... if that was you I contacted on fb... sorry! I didnt realize I could reach you on here. Was not trying to be a creep. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.103.158.113 (talk) 07:08, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

You should not remove content from an article without adequately explaining why even if the article is about yourself. No one here owns articles. You should first discuss it on the talk page with your reason. I have no idea who you contacted on Facebook but that was definitely not me. I had a FB account but never revealed it on Wikipedia. It was possibly another person impersonating me. Masum Reza^📞 12:12, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Untitled

hello Mr.Joker devil (talk) 12:10, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

@Mr.Joker devil: Hi, do you need me for something? Masum Reza^📞 12:18, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

Taking down the links

Thank you for letting me know about the links. I did not know that I could not link to external websites. Thank you for your help, I will review it.Minou0901 (talk) 14:46, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

the edit concern to Assassins Pride

I was talking to the ip about that. And I was going to add something there too. Because Sentai Filmworks did got world wide rights/ license. But not to Asia as they usually do. Tainted-wingsz (talk) 04:44, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

@Tainted-wingsz: Yeah, it seems so. I self reverted my edits. Cheers, Masum Reza^📞 05:05, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Ah, o.k. what I was going to add something similar to Why the Hell are You Here, Teacher!?. Where it mentions it in the parentheses. Or use the arrows; <!-- --> and add that short message in. Tainted-wingsz (talk) 05:12, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Rollback granted

Hi Masumrezarock100. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Beeblebrox (talk) 20:51, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 04:33, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

Mind your language.....

Hey, who are you?? And why are you spying on me?? The_MKR 12:02, 15 November 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moin Khan Razvi (talk • contribs)

I am me. I never spied you, and I never will. You appear to be talking about this edit.

• He is the author of more than 1000 books. - Please provide a reliable source if you want to re-add this.
• He has the most powerful mind in india - It's a clear violation of our WP:NPOV. You should always maintain a nuetral point of view when editing articles.
• He is the great aashique of prophet muhammad salallaho alay hai. - I've no idea what this means. So if you could translate this to English, I would appreciate that.

I think I've answered all of your questions. You have more queries, please don't hesitate to ask me. Thanks. Masum Reza^📞 12:11, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

@Moin Khan Razvi: Feel to continue the conversation here, but please leave my talk page archives alone. Masum Reza^📞 12:23, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

How to add sources

Dear how to add a source as am new in here please guide — Preceding unsigned comment added by SunilElite (talk • contribs) 08:27, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

Hi SunilElite, referencing for beginners page shows the most common way to add inline citations on Wikipedia. Cheers, Masum Reza^📞 10:49, 16 November 2019 (UTC)

Reverts to "List of Nova episodes"

One of my edits to "List of Nova episodes" was reverted by you, indicating that links to archive.org episodes of a public television science documentary were "inappropriate for an encyclopedia." Please note that there were already dozens of these links in place already and I have only been filling in the missing ones as I find them.

Unless I made a link error and did indeed link to something that was not a public television science documentary, I clearly think that this was an erroneous reversion. If you have any specific on the link(s) that were "inappropriate" I would appreciate details of that one or two, as roughly a dozen were removed.

Thank you.

Kevin Dorner (talk) 11:21, 16 November 2019 (UTC)