User talk:Cohesion

Hi! If you are leaving a comment about an image please be sure and link to it or include the file name so I will know which one you are talking about. Thanks! I will generally respond here to comments that are posted here, rather than replying via your talk page (or the article's talk page, if you are writing to me here about an article), so you may want to watch this page, until you are responded to or specifically, let me know where you'd prefer the reply.

Picture of the day

A lime is a citrus fruit, which is typically round, lime green in colour, 3–6 centimetres (1.2–2.4 in) in diameter, and contains acidic juice vesicles. There are several species of citrus trees whose fruits are called limes, including the Key lime, Persian lime, kaffir lime, finger lime, blood lime, and desert lime. Limes are a rich source of vitamin C, are sour, and are often used to accent the flavours of foods and beverages. They are grown year-round, originally in tropical South and Southeast Asia but now in much of the world. Plants with fruit called "limes" have diverse genetic origins; limes do not form a monophyletic group. This photograph shows two limes grown in Brazil, one whole and one halved, and was focus-stacked from 23 images.Photograph credit: Ivar Leidus

This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 14 days are automatically archived to User talk:Cohesion/Archive. Sections without timestamps are not archived.

• Current archive, 1, 2, 3, 4

Smile

Hpetwe has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk pages. Happy editing!

17:08, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Happy Thanksgiving!

File:Turkey Roast.jpg

Happy Turkeyday from Tennis Dynamite!

Enjoy the meal! Tennis DyNamiTe ^{(sign in)} 17:37, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Neither-nor

Thanks for the clarification about using the {{coatofarms}} template. To clear things up for you, "nor" goes with "neither" and "or" goes with "either". So, it's "neither...nor..." and "either...or...". ---Remember the dot 20:58, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Haha, yeah I know how that works for some reason I got a weird random question mark. :O I'm not a robot I promise! hehe. - cohesion 02:39, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Ambareesh.jpg

Hello Cohesion, thanks for your message. But it would beeter if you go through history before tagging no source for old uploaded images, like Image:Ambareesh.jpg. Because some anon-vandals could have removed the source and tag. Regards, Shyam ^(T/C) 08:21, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Yes that batch was much older than I had realized, sorry about that :) - cohesion 16:59, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Anisakids.jpg

Hi there. Looks like the copyright status info for this image was deleted in some vandalism [1]. I've rolled it back to the version which I uploaded, which included a {PD} tag, as it was an image I'd created. Thanks for spotting this. Anilocra 12:43, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Yes, that batch was way old, I found it an odd way, and didn't really realize how stale they were, sorry about that :) - cohesion 17:03, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Hey thanks for cleaning up my James Kim article... I'm still new at this stuff you know :) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by BrianEd (talk • contribs).

No problem, if you ever have a question let me know, or ask on any help page :) Hope you decide to stick around! - cohesion 22:11, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Images on Flickr

I have a few images on Flickr/Creative Commons that I'd like to upload, but I'm not fully sure if they are legal. The licenses vary. What is the difference between Creative Commons 2.0 and 2.5 licensing?

Here are a few examples, can they be uploaded and used in an article?

• Attribution-NoDerivs 2.0 - [2]
• Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 - [3]
• Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 - [4]

Perhaps we should add a quick reference list of all legal licenses and how they are worded/described on some of the CC resources? Thank you for your help Postoak 00:24, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

The general view is that all creative commons licenses are ok except for non-commercial ones, and no-deriv ones. So, only the middle on is ok. Any combination of ShareAlike, and Attribution is ok. We have wikipedia tags for them also {{cc-by-2.5}}, {{cc-by-sa-2.0}} etc. All the different versions are ok, so you don't really have to worry about that at all. If you go to the flickr advanced search [5] and click only cc license, and then both the checks under that for commercial, and derivative works being ok you will only get results that are ok to use on wikipedia. I love flickr, haha - cohesion 01:07, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

"Image:Hsr350x.JPG listed for deletion" Response

I personally did not understand how to post these image files. It was interesting. I sort of tried putting up some photoes that must be deleted, It was experimental. However, these images I posted are very famous and thousands of copies of these photos exists, since it was publically pictured from Korean Railway Research Institude. Nevertheless, the recent image I post it up, is HSR 350x.JPG, and this image is my own work and I own this image. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jamesshin92 (talk • contribs) 08:29, 3 December 2006 (UTC).

Hi, there seems to be a lot going on with this image, so I'll give you a rundown :) It looks like the original source is here. It was then uploaded to the commons, and deleted for not having a source. It was then uploaded to enwiki (Image:Hsr350x.JPG), and autotagged by the dropdown as a speedy delete candidate because you had specified it was only to be used on wikipedia. (This is not accurate, since as far as I know you don't have permission, but even if you did that is not compatible with GFDL). I noticed this in speedy delete, and left a note on your talk page, but didn't delete it right away. You then changed the license to {{PD-self}}[6], which implies that you created the image and are the copyright holder. You then delinked that image, reuploaded it under another name (Image:HSR 350X.JPG), and removed any evidence that you found it on a korean website, claiming, again, that you were the copyright holder. Please read Wikipedia:Image use policy, our copyright restrictions are sometimes surprising for people, who may have never had to deal with intellectual property before. Basically the images you upload, except in rare circumstances need to be actually created by you. As in you got a camera and took the picture. Also, since you had mentioned some of these were test images, if you ever need to delete your own test image just add {{db-author}} to it and someone will delete it shortly. I will assume good faith with this, but just to let you know, falsifying license information, is kinda bad. I don't want to seem like I'm being mean, and this is kinda long, but if you have any other questions feel free to ask. :) - cohesion 18:25, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for helping out, Cohesion - images are still Greek to me. Sandy (Talk) 18:27, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Yes, I've been trying to help out a bit, since I saw the article at FA, but I've asked Korean-speaking people to take over. Thanks again, Sandy (Talk) 18:31, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Please vote!

Hello Cohesion! Wikipedia needs YOU to cast your vote on this FAC. Thanks, Booksworm Hello? Anyone home? Vote! Vote! 17:39, 3 December 2006 (UTC) (P.S. Follow my advice and support it! That's just my advice, you can vote as you please!)

"Speeedy deletion and Copyrights and Images" Response

I am very suprised for your response. And, I'm very disappointed about the strictness of the copyright, but I'm still happy. I am waiting patiently right now for you to answer two massive questions for me immediately in my talk page:D. Sorry if I distracted you.--Jamesshin92 18:31, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

No problem :) We can continue the discussion on your talk page, you don't need to update this one if you have followup questions :) - cohesion 19:06, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Regarding my images

I got your message regarding valid images and description. Im working on getting all the images to be valid on your site. Please give me time I just created my account also few days ago. As you see a few other ones I worked on and found the valid info. Thanks. Ararat arev 10:04, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

No problem, the images are done by a large group of people, so some of them may be deleted, once you find the correct info though you can always reupload them :D - cohesion 05:46, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Annang picture response

Thanks for the tag on the picture I placed at Annang. I went back and cited it, then I contacted the possible copyright holder and got permission. I like the notion of copyright but feel that scanning in a section of a diagram or picture when proper credit is given is a permissible use.

Having received permission, I was sending the Wikipedia copyright page to the holder since it was the first time they had received such a request. Then I noticed Crown copyrights expires after 50 years from the first year of publication. It is 100 years in the US. So I assume that if the map comes from my personal copy of a book that was published in London in 1950 and again in 1967, Wikipedia really does not need one? Would that be your understanding?

Appreciate your experience. --Rcollman 19:33, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Excellent! If it was published before 1956 you should use {{PD-BritishGov}}, and it is public domain :D Thanks for looking in to that. You don't actually need permission for the image, but if you want to mention that you got it that is ok too :) - cohesion 05:51, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Houston article

Peer review is in progess for Houston, Texas at Wikipedia:Peer review/Houston, Texas. Please participate with the article improvement suggestions that will soon follow. Thanks, Postoak 00:09, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the update, maybe eventually I can get to some more of the project pages and check for images :D - cohesion 05:52, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

I am 21 years old, my cock is 6" came across this site to increase size. I had 2 gf who never complained about my cock and always had orgasm, they really enjoyed it. The problem is I never felt like a man there, It just didnt look as I was strong and big like I wanted to. I just found this site last month and allready have some improvement in girth and length size. my cock is really stretchable, so I think it helps me to gain extras faster (not sure). I ordered SizePro packet 3 weeks ago and already see some gains. Hope after 3 months my cock will be like 8-9" I'll feel more secure in bed and finally enjoy having sex. I believe bigger cock will change my life!