Jump to content

Talk:Quintus Pompeius: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Assessment: Dacia (Low); Military history (Start); Politics (Start/Low) (Rater)
MilHistBot (talk | contribs)
Automatic MILHIST checklist assessment
Line 4: Line 4:
{{WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome|class=Start|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome|class=Start|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Biography|living=n|class=Start|listas=Pompeius, Quintus|military-work-group=y|military-priority=Low|politician-work-group=y|politician-priority=Low|royalty-work-group=y|royalty-priority=Low|needs-infobox=y|needs-photo=y}}
{{WikiProject Biography|living=n|class=Start|listas=Pompeius, Quintus|military-work-group=y|military-priority=Low|politician-work-group=y|politician-priority=Low|royalty-work-group=y|royalty-priority=Low|needs-infobox=y|needs-photo=y}}
{{WikiProject Military history |class=Start |Biography=y |Roman=y |Classical=y}}
{{WikiProject Military history |class=Start|b1=no|b2=yes|b3=yes|b4=yes|b5=no|Biography=y |Roman=y |Classical=y}}
{{WikiProject Politics |class=Start |importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Politics |class=Start |importance=Low}}
}}
}}

Revision as of 23:39, 19 November 2019

???

I was reading Plutarch's Life of Tiberius and Gaius Gracchus, and a note to chapter 14 says that the opponent of Tiberius Gracchus was consul 141 and censor 131. The article on the consul 141 doesn't say he was censor 131, which throws the whole thing into question (though if the opponent of Tiberius was in fact the son of the consul, it is highly unlikely - certainly not the case, I would say - that the son would have been censor without being consul). My reference was the first one cited for this page, so based off of that I would assume the note to a published book (included in Oxford World's Classics series, at that) is more likely to be correct. I don't have any more information than the endnote though JW (talk) 07:54, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Quintus Pompeius. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:41, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]