Jump to content

Talk:USS Sarita: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Daiyounger (talk | contribs)
sarcasm
MilHistBot (talk | contribs)
Automatic MILHIST checklist assessment
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WPSHIPS|class=Start|importance=Mid}}
{{WPSHIPS|class=Start|b1=no|b2=no|b3=yes|b4=yes|b5=yes}}
{{WPMILHIST|class=Start|Maritime-task-force=yes|US-task-force=yes}}
{{WPMILHIST|class=Start|Maritime-task-force=yes|US-task-force=yes}}



Revision as of 05:51, 21 November 2019

WikiProject iconShips Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.WikiProject icon
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconMilitary history: Maritime / North America / United States Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.
B checklist
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Maritime warfare task force
Taskforce icon
North American military history task force
Taskforce icon
United States military history task force

isn't the photo of this ship the same photo claiming to be another ship of the same class on the page for the class, only with the number changed? i only ask Daiyounger (talk) 20:29, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think so. I'm reasonably well-informed about AKA's, and the source of this photo is a pretty reliable depository of ship pictures. Lou Sander (talk) 00:23, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

then the identical background, same number of poeple on the rail etc is a coincidence. i see how i made the mistake. Daiyounger (talk) 11:46, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]