Unordered pair: Difference between revisions
HaydenWong (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Bluelinking 1 books for verifiability.) #IABot (v2.1alpha3 |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
While the two elements of an ordered pair (''a'', ''b'') need not be distinct, modern authors only call {''a'', ''b''} an unordered pair if ''a'' ≠ ''b''.<ref> |
While the two elements of an ordered pair (''a'', ''b'') need not be distinct, modern authors only call {''a'', ''b''} an unordered pair if ''a'' ≠ ''b''.<ref> |
||
{{Citation | last1=Düntsch | first1=Ivo | last2=Gediga | first2=Günther | title=Sets, Relations, Functions | publisher=Methodos | series=Primers Series | isbn=978-1-903280-00-3 | year=2000}}.</ref><ref>{{Citation | last1=Fraenkel | first1=Adolf | title=Einleitung in die Mengenlehre | publisher=[[Springer-Verlag]] | location=Berlin, New York | year=1928}}</ref><ref>{{Citation | last1=Roitman | first1=Judith | title=Introduction to modern set theory | publisher=[[John Wiley & Sons]] | location=New York | isbn=978-0-471-63519-2 | year=1990}}.</ref><ref>{{Citation | last1=Schimmerling | first1=Ernest | title=Undergraduate set theory | year=2008 }} |
{{Citation | last1=Düntsch | first1=Ivo | last2=Gediga | first2=Günther | title=Sets, Relations, Functions | publisher=Methodos | series=Primers Series | isbn=978-1-903280-00-3 | year=2000}}.</ref><ref>{{Citation | last1=Fraenkel | first1=Adolf | title=Einleitung in die Mengenlehre | publisher=[[Springer-Verlag]] | location=Berlin, New York | year=1928}}</ref><ref>{{Citation | last1=Roitman | first1=Judith | title=Introduction to modern set theory | publisher=[[John Wiley & Sons]] | location=New York | isbn=978-0-471-63519-2 | year=1990 | url-access=registration | url=https://archive.org/details/introductiontomo0000roit }}.</ref><ref>{{Citation | last1=Schimmerling | first1=Ernest | title=Undergraduate set theory | year=2008 }} |
||
</ref> |
</ref> |
||
But for a few authors a [[Singleton (mathematics)|singleton]] is also considered an unordered pair, although today, most would say that {''a'', ''a''} is a [[multiset]]. It is typical to use the term unordered pair even in the situation where the elements a and b could be equal, as long as this equality has not yet been established. |
But for a few authors a [[Singleton (mathematics)|singleton]] is also considered an unordered pair, although today, most would say that {''a'', ''a''} is a [[multiset]]. It is typical to use the term unordered pair even in the situation where the elements a and b could be equal, as long as this equality has not yet been established. |
Revision as of 16:23, 18 December 2019
In mathematics, an unordered pair or pair set is a set of the form {a, b}, i.e. a set having two elements a and b with no particular relation between them. In contrast, an ordered pair (a, b) has a as its first element and b as its second element.
While the two elements of an ordered pair (a, b) need not be distinct, modern authors only call {a, b} an unordered pair if a ≠ b.[1][2][3][4] But for a few authors a singleton is also considered an unordered pair, although today, most would say that {a, a} is a multiset. It is typical to use the term unordered pair even in the situation where the elements a and b could be equal, as long as this equality has not yet been established.
A set with precisely two elements is also called a 2-set or (rarely) a binary set.
An unordered pair is a finite set; its cardinality (number of elements) is 2 or (if the two elements are not distinct) 1.
In axiomatic set theory, the existence of unordered pairs is required by an axiom, the axiom of pairing.
More generally, an unordered n-tuple is a set of the form {a1, a2,... an}.[5][6][7]
Notes
- ^ Düntsch, Ivo; Gediga, Günther (2000), Sets, Relations, Functions, Primers Series, Methodos, ISBN 978-1-903280-00-3.
- ^ Fraenkel, Adolf (1928), Einleitung in die Mengenlehre, Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag
- ^ Roitman, Judith (1990), Introduction to modern set theory, New York: John Wiley & Sons, ISBN 978-0-471-63519-2.
- ^ Schimmerling, Ernest (2008), Undergraduate set theory
- ^ Hrbacek, Karel; Jech, Thomas (1999), Introduction to set theory (3rd ed.), New York: Dekker, ISBN 978-0-8247-7915-3.
- ^ Rubin, Jean E. (1967), Set theory for the mathematician, Holden-Day
- ^ Takeuti, Gaisi; Zaring, Wilson M. (1971), Introduction to axiomatic set theory, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Berlin, New York: Springer-Verlag
References
- Enderton, Herbert (1977), Elements of set theory, Boston, MA: Academic Press, ISBN 978-0-12-238440-0.