LGBTQ rights in Zambia: Difference between revisions
changed infobox on maximum sentence - see Penal Code Section 155 on "carnal knowledge against the order of nature" (source page 90) - https://www.ilo.org/dyn/natlex/docs/ELECTRONIC/66208/62114/F-489934566/ZMB66208.pdf |
→Restrictions on advocating for LGBT rights: ~~~~ minor edit: removed an extra "government" so phrase that read "government the government" now just reads "the government" |
||
Line 119: | Line 119: | ||
The activist challenged the charges in court by questioning three definitions to which he was charged: (1) "soliciting", (2) "public space" and 3 "immoral purposes".<ref name=":3" /><ref name=":2" /> In the first level of court, the Magistrate Court, the judge ruled in favour of the activist and stated the activist's statements reflected an act of [[Freedom of speech|freedom of expression]].<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":2" /> The government challenged the decision. |
The activist challenged the charges in court by questioning three definitions to which he was charged: (1) "soliciting", (2) "public space" and 3 "immoral purposes".<ref name=":3" /><ref name=":2" /> In the first level of court, the Magistrate Court, the judge ruled in favour of the activist and stated the activist's statements reflected an act of [[Freedom of speech|freedom of expression]].<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":2" /> The government challenged the decision. |
||
In the High Court, the judiciary ruled that |
In the High Court, the judiciary ruled that the government could not prove that the activist's participation in the debate could not be considered "soliciting" as the activists calls were not persistent and did not contain an element of pressure<ref name=":3" />. The court agreed that the television program could be considered a "public place"<ref name=":3" />. The court did not agree with the government that the activist's statements were for "immoral purposes" as the activist was not encouraging people to engage in same sex activities but to protect people from harm.<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":3" /><ref name=":2" /> Additionally, the High Court further ruled that activist was reasonably exercising his [[Freedom of speech|right to freedom of expression]].<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":3" /><ref name=":2" /> |
||
===HIV/AIDS=== |
===HIV/AIDS=== |
||
{{See also|HIV/AIDS in Zambia}} |
{{See also|HIV/AIDS in Zambia}} |
Revision as of 21:29, 25 December 2019
LGBTQ rights in Zambia | |
---|---|
Status | Illegal since 1911 (as Rhodesia)[1][2] |
Penalty | Up to 14 years[3] or up to life imprisonment[4] |
Gender identity | No |
Military | No |
Discrimination protections | None |
Family rights | |
Recognition of relationships | No recognition of same-sex unions |
Adoption | No |
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender persons in Zambia face legal challenges not faced by non-LGBT citizens. Same-sex sexual activity is illegal for both males and females in Zambia.[1]
Formerly a colony of the British Empire, Zambia inherited the laws and legal system of its colonial occupiers upon independence in 1964. Laws concerning homosexuality have largely remained unchanged since then, and homosexuality is covered by sodomy laws that also proscribe bestiality.[1]
Social attitudes toward LGBT people are mostly negative and coloured by perceptions that homosexuality is immoral and a form of insanity.[1] In 1999, the non-governmental organisation Zambia Against People with Abnormal Sexual Acts (ZAPASA) formed to combat homosexuality and homosexuals in Zambia.[1][5]
Arguably the largest recipient of Fundamentalist Evangelical missionaries during British colonial times,[6][7][8][9] Zambia's societal attitudes towards homosexuality heavily mirror these influences. A 2010 survey revealed that only 2% of Zambians find homosexuality to be morally acceptable; nine points below the figure recorded in Uganda (11% acceptance).[10]
In 2013, Christine Kaseba, the wife of former President Michael Sata, said that "silence around issues of men who have sex with men should be stopped and no one should be discriminated against on the basis of their sexual orientation."[11]
Recent reports suggest authorities in Zambia are using anal examinations on homosexuals which are abusive.[12]
Law regarding same-sex sexual activity
Same-sex sexual activity is proscribed by Cap. 87, Sections 155 through 157 of Zambia's penal code.[5]
Section 155 ("Unnatural Offences") classifies homosexual sex (in the vague description "carnal knowledge of any person against the order of nature") as a felony punishable by imprisonment for 14 years.[5]
Any person who- (a) has carnal knowledge of any person against the order of nature; or ... (c) permits a male person to have carnal knowledge of him or her against the order of nature; is guilty of a felony and is liable to imprisonment for fourteen years.
Section 156 imposes imprisonment for seven years for any "attempt to commit unnatural offences". Finally, Section 157 applies to "any act of gross indecency" committed between males, "whether in public or in private", and classifies such acts as felonies punishable by imprisonment for five years. The provision also extends to "attempts to procure the commission of any such act [of gross indecency]".[5]
Any male person who, whether in public or private, commits any act of gross indecency with another male person, or procures another male person to commit any act of gross indecency with him, or attempts to procure the commission of any such act by any male person with himself or with another male person, whether in public or private, is guilty of a felony and is liable to imprisonment for five years.
Although Zambia's penal code contains no explicit reference to consensual sex between females, Cap. 87, Section 155 legally covers lesbianism.[1]
However, like all former British East and Southern African colonies, Zambia enacted its constitution in the 1990s, overriding much of the pre-1964 criminal code, and there are very broad protections against discrimination, with much of the language lifted from the UN Charter on Human Rights. [13] It can be argued that homosexuality is constitutionally protected under Article 23 of the 1996 Constitution:
23. [Protection from discrimination on the ground of race,etc.]
(1) Subject to clauses (4), (5) and (7), no law shall make any provision that is discriminatory either of itself or in its effect.
(2) Subject to clauses (6), (7) and (8), no person shall be treated in a discriminatory manner by any person acting by virtue of any written law or in the performance of the functions of any public office or any public authority.
(3) In this Article the expression "discriminatory" mean, affording different treatment to different persons attributable, wholly or mainly to their respective descriptions by race, tribe, sex, place of origin, marital status, political opinions colour or creed whereby persons of one such description are subjected to disabilities or restrictions to which persons of another such description are not made subject or are accorded privileges or advantages which are not accorded to persons of another such description.
Considering that any constitution overrides all other laws, it is relevant that few, if any, prosecutions for homosexuality have taken place, as this would allow the relevant Criminal Code sections to be tested, and deleted if they are found to contravene the Constitution.
Recognition of same-sex relationships
Zambia provides no recognition of same-sex couples. In 2006, Home Affairs Minister Ronnie Shikapwasha stated that Zambia would never legalise same-sex marriage, claiming that it is a sin that goes against the country's Christian status (see Religion in Zambia).[14] In February 2010, the National Constitutional Conference (NCC) unanimously agreed to adopt a clause that expressly forbids marriage between people of the same sex.[15]
Constitutional protections against discrimination
There is implicit but no explicit legal protection against discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity in the Zambian Constitution. The Constitution of 1991, as amended by Act no. 17 of 1996, contains an anti-discrimination clause, present in Article 23 of the document. According to Article 23(1), "no law shall make any provision that is discriminatory either of itself or in its effect". Article 23(2) further prohibits discrimination "by any person acting by virtue of any written law or in the performance of the functions of any public office or any public authority", and Article 23(3) defines discrimination as extending to differential treatment of persons on the basis of "race, tribe, sex, place of origin, marital status, political opinions, color or creed".[5]
Living conditions
According to a report submitted to the United Nations Human Rights Committee by Global Rights and the International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission, the criminalization of consensual homosexual sex in Zambia "has a devastating impact on same-sex practicing people in Zambia". The report asserts that LGBT people are subject to arbitrary arrest and detention, "discrimination in education, employment, housing, and access to services", and extortion–often with the knowledge or participation of law enforcement authorities.[5]
According to a report by Behind the Mask, a non-profit organisation dedicated to LGBT affairs in Africa,[16] most LGBT people in Zambia are closeted due to fear of targeting and victimisation. Lesbians are especially vulnerable, according to the report, due to the patriarchal structure of Zambian society.[1]
The U.S. Department of State's 2010 Human Rights Report found that "the government enforced the law that criminalizes homosexual conduct and did not respond to societal discrimination" and that "societal violence against homosexual persons occurred, as did societal discrimination in employment, housing, and access to education or health care."[17]
Restrictions on advocating for LGBT rights
The Zambian government does not permit advocacy of LGBT rights[5], however freedom of expression has been affirmed by the courts.[18]
In 1998, in a statement to the National Assembly of Zambia, Vice President Christon Tembo called for the arrest of individuals who promote gay rights, citing a need to "protect public morality".[5] President Frederick Chiluba described homosexuality as "unbiblical" and "against human nature".[19] Later, Home Affairs Minister Peter Machungwa ordered the arrest of any individual or group attempting to formally register a gay rights advocacy group. Herbert Nyendwa, the Registrar of Societies, stated that he would refuse to register any LGBT organisation or civic group.[5]
The People v. Paul Kasonkomona
The restrictions on advocating for LGBT rights were challenged in Zambia's courts in 2013, after a human rights activist appeared on TV talk show program. During the program, the activist called for the decriminalization of homosexuality in Zambia[20], the recognition of rights for sexual minorities [18], and HIV's spread to be combated among sexual minority groups[21]. After the program, the activist was stopped by police, held in jail overnight, and accused of inciting the public to take part in indecent activities.[20][21][22] The activist was later charged with "idle and disorderly conduct under Section 178(g) of the Penal Code, Cap. 87 of the Laws of Zambia". [21][23]
The activist challenged the charges in court by questioning three definitions to which he was charged: (1) "soliciting", (2) "public space" and 3 "immoral purposes".[21][23] In the first level of court, the Magistrate Court, the judge ruled in favour of the activist and stated the activist's statements reflected an act of freedom of expression.[18][23] The government challenged the decision.
In the High Court, the judiciary ruled that the government could not prove that the activist's participation in the debate could not be considered "soliciting" as the activists calls were not persistent and did not contain an element of pressure[21]. The court agreed that the television program could be considered a "public place"[21]. The court did not agree with the government that the activist's statements were for "immoral purposes" as the activist was not encouraging people to engage in same sex activities but to protect people from harm.[18][21][23] Additionally, the High Court further ruled that activist was reasonably exercising his right to freedom of expression.[18][21][23]
HIV/AIDS
As of July 2007, no public or private programmes provide HIV-related counselling to homosexual men in Zambia, where the HIV seroprevalence rate among adults is approximately 17%.[24] Although men involved in same-sex sexual relationships have a higher risk of HIV transmission, the government-operated National AIDS Control Program does not address same-sex relationships.[5]
In June 2007, the Zambian Ministry of Health agreed to conduct, together with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Society for Family Health under Population Services International, an assessment to evaluate HIV and AIDS prevalence and transmission among gay men.[25]
Summary table
Same-sex sexual activity legal | (Penalty: between men, from 15 years to life imprisonment; between women, up to 14 years imprisonment[4]) |
Equal age of consent | |
Anti-discrimination laws in employment only | |
Anti-discrimination laws in the provision of goods and services | |
Anti-discrimination laws in all other areas (incl. indirect discrimination, hate speech) | |
Recognition of same-sex couples | |
Step-child adoption by same-sex couples | |
Joint adoption by same-sex couples | |
Gays allowed to serve in the military | |
Right to change legal gender | |
Access to IVF for lesbians | |
Commercial surrogacy for gay male couples | |
MSMs allowed to donate blood |
See also
References
- ^ a b c d e f g Numwa, Regina. "Zambia". Behind The Mask. Retrieved 1 June 2008.
- ^ Where is it illegal to be gay?
- ^ Ottosson, Daniel (May 2008). "State-sponsored Homophobia: A world survey of laws prohibiting same sex activity between consenting adults" (PDF). International Lesbian and Gay Association (ILGA). p. Page 43. Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 March 2009. Retrieved 5 May 2009.
- ^ a b "Country Profile: Zambia". Human Dignity Trust.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j Fabeni; Stefano; Cary Alan Johnson; Joel Nana (July 2007). "The Violations of the Rights of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Persons in Zambia" (PDF). Global Rights and International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission. Archived from the original (PDF) on 1 October 2008. Retrieved 1 June 2008.
- ^ "Articles: Jerusalem Lost: The Evangelical Empire Christianity's contribution to Victorian Colonial Expansion". British Empire. Retrieved 11 April 2014.
- ^ [1] Archived 19 August 2011 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ "History of Protestant Missions in Zimbabwe". Wmausa.org. Archived from the original on 7 March 2012. Retrieved 11 April 2014.
- ^ "Christianity". Jd-elliott.net. Retrieved 11 April 2014.
- ^ "Biggest Ever Studies on Attitudes to Religion and Morality in Africa Released". Newstime Africa. Archived from the original on 7 April 2014. Retrieved 11 April 2014.
- ^ Jean Ann Esselink (8 November 2013). "Zambia's First Lady Stuns Africa By Calling For An End To Homophobia". The New Civil Rights Movement. Archived from the original on 11 November 2013. Retrieved 11 April 2014.
- ^ Avenue, Human Rights Watch | 350 Fifth; York, 34th Floor | New; t 1.212.290.4700, NY 10118-3299 USA | (12 July 2016). "Dignity Debased | Forced Anal Examinations in Homosexuality Prosecutions". Human Rights Watch. Retrieved 1 July 2019.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) - ^ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 11 June 2007. Retrieved 25 October 2011.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) Human Rights in UNDP, Practice Note, April 2005 - ^ "Zambia will never legalise gay marriages-gov't". African Veil. 10 December 2006. Archived from the original on 17 September 2010. Retrieved 1 June 2008.
- ^ NCC to adopt clause that forbids same sex marriage Archived 8 September 2012 at the Wayback Machine
- ^ "Who we are". Behind The Mask. Retrieved 1 June 2008.
- ^ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 14 May 2011. Retrieved 17 May 2011.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link) - ^ a b c d e Reid & Meerkotter, G. & A. (4 August 2015). "Africa Ruling Move LGBT Rights Forward". Jurist. Retrieved 20 December 2019.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ "Special Issues and Campaigns: Lesbian And Gay Rights". World Report 1999. Human Rights Watch. 1999. Archived from the original on 23 July 2008. Retrieved 6 August 2008.
- ^ a b Smith, D. (9 April 2013). "Zambian gay rights activist arrested". The Guardian. Retrieved 19 December 2019.
{{cite news}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ a b c d e f g h "The people v. Kasonkomona". Columbia Global Freedom of Expression. n.d. Retrieved 19 December 2019.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ "Amnesty calls for release of Zambia's first arrested gay couple". Mail and Guardian. 12 September 2013. Retrieved 19 December 2019.
{{cite news}}
: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ a b c d e Legal Grounds III: Reproductive and Sexual Rights in Sub-saharan African courts (PDF). Pretoria: Pretoria University Law Press. 2017. pp. 155–157. ISBN 978-1-920538-63-7.
- ^ "Zambia". The World Factbook 2008. Central Intelligence Agency. 15 May 2008. Retrieved 1 June 2008.
- ^ Mhlambiso, Nthateng (26 July 2007). "Hope for Zambian MSM". Behind The Mask. Archived from the original on 29 October 2009. Retrieved 1 June 2008.